File: 3abf07631e800795ba5b0a8a5d29f3e1.jpg (31KB, 1014x396px) Image search:
[Google]
31KB, 1014x396px
Do any of you own a secondary, compact camera and carry it with you everywhere and use that instead of your smartphone camera? Is there any point in doing it when you don't or can't carry your main camera or are you just being autistic at that point?
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3125437
Smartphone cameras are really good now, so no I don't do that. Unless it's one of my little film cameras.
>>
>>3125437
I have a Canon Powershot I carry because I don't have a smart phone. The flip phone I have does have a camera in it, and it isn't even that bad, so I've started carrying the point and shoot less.
>>
I use a G1Xii. Phones are a communications device and pretty nifty for taking notes and checking the date and time. Wouldn't use them for much else though
File: IMG_6233.png (560KB, 900x561px) Image search:
[Google]
560KB, 900x561px
What’s the best way to retain the most value while selling modern camera lenses?
15 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3125329
DO NOT forget to wipe your jizz off
>>
>>3125335
Thanks for the advice anon. How do I scoop the jizz outside of the aspherical elements.
>>
>>3125338
Very carefully
File: 4773401264_e8b4fa0981_b.jpg (400KB, 1024x682px) Image search:
[Google]
400KB, 1024x682px
Any cheap compact film cameras that don't cost more than film slrs? I can't justifying paying more than 50 bucks on a point and shoot.
13 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
stop making all these retarded threads
i know you're just one faggot
>>
>>3125300
literally search anywhere on eBay? point and shits are dirt cheap and you can find one for under 50
sage this shit
>>
>>3125300
all the good ones have gone to meme prices. look for any early autofocus compact with a prime lens, they'll be chunky but decent.
Anonymous
Odd photo that makes me uncomfortable 2017-08-01 05:46:33 Post No.3125139
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Odd photo that makes me uncomfortable 2017-08-01 05:46:33 Post No.3125139
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: IMG_3075.jpg (63KB, 568x426px) Image search:
[Google]
63KB, 568x426px
Odd photo that makes me uncomfortable
Anonymous
2017-08-01 05:46:33
Post No. 3125139
[Report]
[View this topic]
Hey guys, so I found this photo and I'm not sure but something about it seems odd. I'm not quite sure but it makes me feel nostalgia and slightly nervous. It may be just be who thinks this but if not please let me know it's driving me crazy. It may be because the man is watering grass or there is a hard hat on in the middle of a field but that's not it
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 568 Image Height 426 Scene Capture Type Standard
11 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
Sounds like your photo is haunted. Burn your camera, burn your PC, move to Bulgaria. It's the only way.
>>
Is it because the dude is black and it looks like he's busting a nut?
>>
whats wrong with niggers watering grass?
Anonymous
Bride, groom who slammed Dallas wedding photographer online, in media must pay $1.08M 2017-08-01 02:52:06 Post No.3125048
[Report]
Bride, groom who slammed Dallas wedding photographer online, in media must pay $1.08M 2017-08-01 02:52:06 Post No.3125048
[Report]
File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx)
0B, 0x0pxpx
Bride, groom who slammed Dallas wedding photographer online, in media must pay $1.08M
Anonymous
2017-08-01 02:52:06
Post No. 3125048
[Report]
[View this topic]
>A Dallas wedding photographer was awarded $1.08 million Friday in a defamation suit against a local blogger and her husband who launched a social media campaign that destroyed her business.
>Neely Moldovan, who at the time maintained the blog "A Complete Waste of Makeup," and her husband hired Polito's company to photograph their October 2014 wedding and the events leading up to it. Weeks after the ceremony, Neely Moldovan began emailing to ask when the high-resolution photos would be available.
>Polito's company reminded the couple that, as stated in the contract they signed, the photos would be released once the album was completed. The couple was required to submit an order form and select a cover photo before the album could be completed, but had not done so, according to the suit.
>After several weeks of back and forth and the couple's objection to paying $125 for the cover, Polito said she planned to absorb the cost to satisfy her customers.
>Two days after she emailed the couple, Polito learned they had contacted several local television stations and told KXAS-TV (NBC5) that Polito was "holding their photos hostage," according to the suit.
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/courts/2017/07/31/bride-groom-slammed-dallas-wedding-photographer-online-media-must-pay-108m
You ever have a customer this shitty, /p/?
11 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
I've never had a customer before
>>
>>3125048
>/p/
>Working professionals
Kek
>>
>>3125048
In my line work all the time, although my job has nothing to do with photography. When you work in industrial b2b, everyone is an enemy including your own corp's other departments.
I once caught a client using two year old photos on their reclamation of damaged goods by looking at the exif, which earned me the reputation of a god damn supahaxor among the 60yo coworkers.
Going to dump a few of my gun related photos.
Other welcome, don't care if its airsoft or replicas.
1/17
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 42 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3023 Image Height 4534 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:08:01 11:25:42 Exposure Time 1.7 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness -7.9 EV Exposure Bias -1.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 934 Image Height 1400 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
27 Posts / 21 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3124870
2/17
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4896 Image Height 2760 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:08:01 11:26:56 Exposure Time 30 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness -12.6 EV Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1400 Image Height 789 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>3124871
3/17
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 53 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4896 Image Height 3264 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:08:01 11:27:24 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 6400 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness -5.8 EV Exposure Bias -1.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1400 Image Height 933 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>3124872
4/17
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-Pro1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 42 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4896 Image Height 3264 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:08:01 11:28:19 Exposure Time 30 sec F-Number f/1.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/1.0 Brightness -12.6 EV Exposure Bias -0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 28.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1400 Image Height 875 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Hard Subject Distance Range Unknown
File: P7ZbIas.jpg (46KB, 640x870px) Image search:
[Google]
46KB, 640x870px
Is there any point to upgrading from a decent entry level camera if I'm not shooting professionally?
I started out with a D3300 and eventually bought a D7200 when I got a little more serious about photography. My current kit cost me around 1000eur and does pretty much everything that I want. Therefore, I'm sort of wondering wh it is that people buy cameras like the 5D that costs way more than the D7200, when the image quality is largey the same. I don't see what cameras above the D7200 actually offer.
This isn't really me asking about whether or not I should upgrade personally, but moreso a request for an explanation as to why hobbyists would ever buy anything more expensive than something like the D7200.
pic unrelated
19 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3124868
I forgot to add that I know more expensive cameras can do things like having ridiculous ISOs and a few other weird features that show off new technology more than provide actual use. Again, I'm asking where the actual practical value would be in the more expensive cameras.
>>
I love how that one picture sums up Islam so perfectly. No slurs, no presumptions, just an observation.
>>
>>3124868
> an explanation as to why hobbyists would ever buy anything more expensive than something like the D7200.
The cameras+lenses involved are much more capable at producing nicer, higher resolution photos in various situations. With more reliability and speed on the AF and so on.
The same reasons why many professionals "need" to choose a good camera to be competitive, really.
It's absolutely not a special expense for a hobbiy anyhow. What is special is that it's one of the professions where the full set of the *most* adequate tools is relatively cheap.
File: _C005884.jpg (2MB, 3264x4928px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3264x4928px
first day with a digital camera. here are some terrible photos for you. its late as fuck i'll post the few i edited and the rest tomorrow.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:08:01 00:19:37 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness 4.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
11 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
File: _C005864.jpg (2MB, 3264x4928px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3264x4928px
>>3124712
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:07:31 23:57:20 Exposure Time 1/750 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness 6.6 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
>>
File: _C005861.jpg (2MB, 3264x4928px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3264x4928px
>>3124713
LMAO ERIKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:07:31 23:34:17 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Brightness 2.1 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
>>
File: _C005872.jpg (1MB, 4928x3264px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 4928x3264px
>>3124714
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD. Camera Model GR II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 28 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:08:01 00:07:31 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness 4.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.30 mm Color Space Information sRGB Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal
File: IMG_7475.png (995KB, 1136x640px) Image search:
[Google]
995KB, 1136x640px
When you unironically enjoy possibly the most normie photography yt channel with all its cheesy jokes and cringy glory.
I dunno, call me all thats wrong with the world, but I just keep whatching it mayne. The jokes are relatable, mayne.
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3124695
There are many times when they should have done less jokes and made an attempt to explore a subject with more depth because it deserved it.
One notable example was this one:
"Pro DSLR + Cheapo Lens vs "Cheapo" DSLR + Pro Lens"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk5IMmEDWH4
Kai doesn't take the idea seriously at all and pretty well rigs everything in favor of the cheap camera + expensive lens combo. But I wonder how things would have turned out if he had actually tried to take advantage of the things the expensive camera offers over the cheap one like shooting fast action or having a 1.3x compared to 1.5x crop factor. I think they should have chosen two cameras a little father apart in capabilities as well, to stress the differences.
>>
>>3124704
Yea I was also disappointed by that one.
I would always cry internally at all the gear destruction he used to do at drtv, being someone who would never have that money.
Now he makes his own videos at Kai W on yt. Has a more serious tone. The stuff's still good.
>>
>>3124711
cry internally at all the gear destruction
you should stop being this autistic. those are not living beings, nor do they have any other type of value. if they were classic cameras that aren't manufactured anymore, you would make a bit of sense. I'm also poor btw
Anonymous
Who takes better pictures of people in your opinion? 2017-08-01 04:55:56 Post No.3124685
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Who takes better pictures of people in your opinion? 2017-08-01 04:55:56 Post No.3124685
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 8157185.jpg (2MB, 3528x2000px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3528x2000px
Who takes better pictures of people in your opinion?
Anonymous
2017-08-01 04:55:56
Post No. 3124685
[Report]
[View this topic]
My friends in Discord can't decide between this website
https://david-veldman.squarespace.com/people/
and pic related.
We welcome your thoughts on who shoots people better. :)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X10 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4000 Image Height 2667 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpcm Vertical Resolution 300 dpcm Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2017:07:12 08:58:56 Exposure Time 1/150 sec F-Number f/5.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/5.0 Brightness 5.7 EV Exposure Bias 0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 7.60 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1600 Image Height 1100 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
6 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>top left
>the fuck you doin get the fuck outta here don't point that camera at ms
>>
Pic related is a much better photographer. No contest. Is this a troll thread?
David Veldman is too awful to actually be from /p/. This is clearly a troll.
>>
>>3124685
>my friends
Fucking lost right there.
File: 11138504_10153481774452758_5221955773233270349_n.jpg (54KB, 960x454px) Image search:
[Google]
54KB, 960x454px
Captured this few years ago, any suggestions? I was pretty proud of it at the time, especially for the amount of rain that i had get... Now i think i can do better but still love it...
6 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Stay away from fake and gay mug cinema/pano crops.
>>
>>3124641
you are right, i cropped it just because on the top side there is too much black clouds and on the bottom side too much black (fields without lights)
>>
>>3124634
black out some of the houses at lower right
File: sasha_grey_juliette_society.jpg (20KB, 640x1007px) Image search:
[Google]
20KB, 640x1007px
alright niggers i need help. got a digital camera after years of shooting film. the problem is, either the sky looks nice and blue and my subject is dark af or the subject looks fine and the sky is blown out. whats the secret here lads. i messed around with the metering and it didnt change that much. am i supposed to fix this in post. what do you guys do. please no bully im a digital noob and would like to learn.
9 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Don't shoot into the sun.
>>
>>3124622
yeah I actually knew that. was barely shooting into the suns direction. had 40 minutes until sunset time. any other tips. even the pictures i did take away from the sun the skys barely blue. whats going on here.
>>
shoot raw.
mask and correct in post.
expose properly from the start.
there's 1,000s of answers. shoot more. pixels are basically free.
File: Weston-pepper30.jpg (25KB, 216x272px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 216x272px
Thoughts on pepper #30? Took him a couple years to get this right and about a week with that pepper.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2010:06:26 21:45:32 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 216 Image Height 272
9 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
File: Cabbage-Leaf-1931-39V.jpg (464KB, 1000x814px) Image search:
[Google]
464KB, 1000x814px
This is a SFW board!
Here, cover it with some leaves.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Digital Photo Professional Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:01:14 11:05:50 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/5.6 ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 70.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>3124452
Not entirely sure what the fuck is going on here
>>
File: MTE1ODA0OTcxODIyNzEyMzMz.jpg (142KB, 1200x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
142KB, 1200x1200px
>>3124529
Group f/64 for 1000 Alex
>Which photographer was known for his Southwestern architecture, numerous vegetable still lifes and solarized nudes of his wife, Tina Moldotti?
Who is Edward Weston?
Also daily triples.
File: 39-m.kia021_150cm_862.jpg (258KB, 862x546px) Image search:
[Google]
258KB, 862x546px
How is something like this achieved? Is it a filter?
13 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
Hard to say. Seems like it was a bright cloudy day and the photog over-exposed the shot just a bit. Doesn't explain how sharp and dark the birds are tho. Any idea who took it?
>>
File: 2b919d26426640632009c0f2f9fcc063--rainy-night-rainy-days.jpg (47KB, 550x362px) Image search:
[Google]
47KB, 550x362px
>>3124443
Abbas Kiarostami - Iranian most famous for his film career, but also a fairly prolific photographer. Another of his.
I started taking pictures because of him.
>>
File: sebastiao salgado.jpg (186KB, 960x702px) Image search:
[Google]
186KB, 960x702px
>>3124435
Could be post processing, but honestly it just seems like a good exposure in the right place at the right time and shot on film.
File: IMG_5788-2.jpg (555KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
555KB, 1000x667px
Yo what up /p/ lets do a sports thread
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 70D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:07:31 15:32:21 Exposure Time 1/5000 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 200.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
6 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3124349
Honestly let's not. Sports are gay as fuck unless it's skateboarding or footfag.
>>
File: IMG_5841-2.jpg (573KB, 1000x667px) Image search:
[Google]
573KB, 1000x667px
>>3124352
Footbag?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 70D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:07:31 15:32:25 Exposure Time 1/6400 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 200.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard