Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 45. page

File: Pleurobrachia_bachei_wide.jpg (23KB, 700x248px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 700x248px

it's a jellyfish.

>>3123046
crop as closely as you can and post the full size image
it's some kind of light moving through the sky, the squiggles are trails over the course of the exposure (like with light painting)
looks like a pair of lights so I'd guess drone or other aircraft

File: Untitled2.jpg (431KB, 1035x795px) Image search: [Google]

431KB, 1035x795px

>>3123048
Somehow forgot to mention these are pictures of Stars.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Width	1035
Image Height	795

File: P1030324.jpg (4MB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2048x2048px

>>3120613

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	DMC-GX7
Camera Software	Pixlr
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Width	2048
Image Height	2048
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Flash	No Flash
White Balance	Manual
Exposure Time	3/2500 sec
ISO Speed Rating	400
F-Number	f/13.0

File: P1030369.jpg (2MB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x2048px

>>3120615

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	DMC-GX7
Camera Software	Pixlr
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Width	2048
Image Height	2048
Focal Length	25.00 mm
Flash	No Flash
White Balance	Manual
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
ISO Speed Rating	200
F-Number	f/11.0

File: P1030223.jpg (717KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

717KB, 1000x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	88 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:25 20:57:16
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	34.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3119593
Stacking is about noise control, not exposure. If you don't catch it in every frame it won't show up in the stacked image.
You have to do the proper exposure first for every frame and then stack them and then do the stretching in post.

File: Dumbbell02.jpg (773KB, 2109x1299px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 2109x1299px

>>3119593
Mine from this morning :) Dumbbell Nebula.
Frames: 20x60 Seconds Light Frames, 35 Bias Frames, 20 Dark Frames.
Stacked in Deep Sky Stacker, Processed in PixInsight 1.8 and Photoshop CS6

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2109
Image Height	1299
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	100 dpi
Vertical Resolution	100 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:24 04:58:42
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2109
Image Height	1299

>>3120241
I'm still learning but what about RegiStax?

I tried some milky way shots with DSS and 50 frames but they turned out like shit (untracked)

File: 2017-08-04 10.07.41 2.jpg (3MB, 2048x3088px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2048x3088px

>>3127256

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	VSCO Android Version
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:08:04 21:59:56
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170804_213854.jpg (4MB, 1549x2753px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1549x2753px

>>3127257
Blown highlights. Fuck it I'll just make it black and white lmao.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Lightroom Android 3.0.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:08:04 21:38:54
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

File: 2017-08-04 10.02.07 2.jpg (4MB, 2048x3088px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2048x3088px

>>3127259
I shot into the sun a lot this roll. Wtf is wrong with me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	VSCO Android Version
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:08:04 22:01:48
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated

>>3124734
>small sensorlet detected

Should have bought a Sony instead fambam

report back when you have photos from it.

>>3124734
A Holga with a sharp lens? Could be interesting if the vignette doesn't skyrocket.

>20mm
too wide
>24
perfect
>28
just buy a 35mm already

24mm if you're on crop
20mm if you're on FF

14.

Unless we're not talking about ultrawides too. Then 20 for w i d e and 35 for general use.

Buddy I don't need it to be film for my shots to be complete shit

>>3127093
Yeah I feel that, but it's worse when it's film because it costs money lmao.

File: 1494798013350.png (215KB, 365x300px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 365x300px

>Go to a remote location I'll probably never visit again
>90% of pics are mediocre at best

>>3126794
Where did it all go so wrong for ken? He used to be quite a fit intelligent guy.

There's nothing wrong with M43 users. I much prefer them to the constant Sonycucking going on in this board. I feel like a M43 is much more likely to actually go out and take pictures instead of staying in and wanking over specs.

>>3126804
t. Pen-F user

What kind of food?

Just use Google my dude.

>>3126579
If you want the true answer to that, go on Instagram look up the hashtags like #foodporn #vcbfood look at the top 9, those should give you an idea.

But in turn can you answer my question


is Lightroom better than Photoshop for editing pictures of food. I've been using ps for some time, it does the work. But people suggest Lightroom, how is it better.

What makes you think you need lights anon?

>wanna get into photography
>have to use a camera
>have to use lights, basement to dark

File: 1501762692992.png (84KB, 245x316px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 245x316px

>wanna get into painting
>means I have to fuck around with a shit load of colors

>Bonded by strength, loyalty, and tenacity, wolf packs are born leaders in the wild. We learn, travel, and live in unity, each of us bred with natural gifts to help our neighbor. We are stronger as one than we are apart.

>Our newest presets highlight the pack’s journey through untouched terrain, capturing the pure splendor found only in carving your own path.

>Our Wolf Pack Presets were designed for two tribes of visual artists. The first is landscape photographers who find themselves in awe of the striking natural beauty they capture behind the lens. The second is portrait and wedding photographers who are inspired and influenced by their surrounding environment.

>A portion of your Presets purchase will go toward preserving our environment, from the cerulean seas to the mighty trees. To learn more about why and how we give back, visit our We Care page.

>The Wolf Pack Set includes 8 Develop Presets & 10 WB Presets. For Adobe Lightroom 6 (CC), 5 & 4. and ACR Presets for Photoshop CC & CS6. (Both the Lr Presets and ACR Presets are included in purchase).

>>3126417
Its the same idiots that Buy the moodygrams bullshit and "hustle". Also half of the time the bare raw photo looks getter. Like talk about crushed blacks.

>>3126417
vsco

>>3126342
by the time that tech is matured enough to be used in consumer camera there would be 200MP medium format digital PnS with 2TB built-in memory already )))))))))

>>3126342
How exactly does high density tape storage affect film vs digital photography?

>>3126342
>Thats it, were going back to physical storage. Physical media confirmed superior.
Uh, what? This tape is digital storage for digital data, like HDD or NAND.

It doesn't help jack shit with film photography before it's digitized by a camera or scanner.

... digital wins again, if anything.

Also, this almost certainly won't make it into even digital cameras. The best we can hope for is that at some point someone lets us use standard 2.5" SSD or M.2 type of storage, but even that isn't going to happen easily.

Fix tooth
Fix hairline or remove hairline (shave head)
Photography wise, narrower lense

>>3125390
Bumfights?

Sorry to hear about that, Harrirrison. Hope everything got settled in court.

It's all about the focal length. Prime lenses are just better able to get shorter focal length than zoom lenses, hence why primefags hold up "muh superior quality" as though the marginal difference really matters much. Zooms are just more versatile and better

>>3125284
Zoom lenses are more complex and thus more difficult to do well. In the pre-CAD era, good zooms were hard to come by, nowadays they're much better on average.

For compact film cameras like Stylus you posted, zooms also have MUCH smaller apertures (like f/8-f/13 instead of f/3.5-f/4 typical for primes), so they essentially limit you to daylight or flash shooting.

>>3125284
Depends on the lens. But primes are almost always optically better for the same price.

Regardless, some $100 lens usually doesn't fare well against a $2000 one, even if the latter is a zoom lens. Companies tend to +- know how to price their stuff.

>taking advantage of poor black people for muh photography charm

Kys yourself stupid bleeding heart virtue signaling libshit retard