we should make a new lightroom preset room on volafile
Here's this
https://pastebin.com/2riEm5mf
>>3114770
Why would you want to use volafile again?
I suggest posting files on dropmefiles.com (or any other website that keeps the files for at least a week)
Otherwise the thread would only be filled with people asking to re-upload stuff.
any of my /motormadness/ bros still around?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 7D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:06:15 16:12:56 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 300.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1500 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3095578
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:06:15 16:21:44 Exposure Time 1/20 sec F-Number f/19.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/19.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 40.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1500 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3095582
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 40D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:06:15 16:36:59 Exposure Time 1/6000 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 1/2 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 300.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1500 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3095593
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 7D Mark II Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:06:15 19:44:02 Exposure Time 1/8 sec F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Exposure Bias 1/2 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 300.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1500 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
I am doing analog photography since about two years now, also didn't do any digital photography before that. I am dumping the best images (imo) i shot so far, please give me some feedback. what is good about them, what is not so good about them?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Created 2017:04:29 17:24:26
#2
#3
#4
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Elements 6.0 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 1200 dpi Vertical Resolution 1200 dpi Image Created 2016:08:19 13:22:06 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1640 Image Height 1120
Why aren't you using instax film on your TLR or other MF camera?
Here's the result.
>>3128912
A little bit sharper than the taken with the fuji instashit and the colors looks more real because there's no fill flash.
Sorry for the quality, my phone is a potato.
>>3128911
Terrible cost / value quotient.
Just scooped this baby up for $1000 canuck bucks. You losers jealous.
>>3128899
did you scoop it out of a heaping pile of shit?
Not jealous at all since last year I bought a Minilux for £125. You got cucked.
>>3128900
Dubs of truth.
>my $0.50 Pentax takes the same fucking photos as this consumer fetishist bauble
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Camera Software GIMP 2.8.14 Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.8 Serial Number 1132529712 Lens Name EF100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2016:07:12 16:49:58 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1230 Image Height 800 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Partial Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Unknown Focus Mode One-Shot Drive Mode Timed Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Fine Self-Timer Length 10 sec Macro Mode Normal White Balance Custom Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 160 Color Matrix 129
Went to Yellowstone last week, dumping a few snapshits I took there
what's the best alternative to X100 ?
gr ii
>>3128183
This, or X70.
ALRIGHT LET'S END THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL. What's better film or digital. Vote. http://www.strawpoll.me/13632881
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2007:02:24 14:47:28
It doesn't get any more legit than a slow board on a japanimation forum. Every photographer worldwide will have to bow to these results.
>>3127666
digital is more practical, film looks nicer
no matter how many times his board will argue about it, those two things will remain the same
>>3127681
This
Tfw you took your best picture over 3 years ago. With some shit cell phone at a disgusting mall. Kill me.
>that name
Tfw when you're still retarded and not only 3 years ago.
>>3125654
>>3125642
>tfw your best picture is of a mall in scarberia
lol
What went wrong /p/?
Are MFT dead because
Pros won't use them because their image quality is shit
Hobbyist/Enthusiasts won't use them because of their small sensor
Consumers won't use them because it is ugly unlike the cool looking entry level Fuji that is marketed towards women and has a bigger X-trans sensor
Portability with meme4/3 is none existent since you'll basically bring more batteries and their pro lenses are as big as crop sensor lenses.
Lenses also cost more than APS-C lenses. Is this the nail in the coffin for meme4/3? Even a 35mm film cameras takes better photos and has a bigger film sensor.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Photographer Picasa Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1200 Image Height 675
Went to my local camera store today, they had 2 fujifilm lenses on display, some Panasonic FZ1000 type cameras and a few Panasonic m/4/3 lenses and then a whole cabinet of Olympus gear from the EM1 M2 and the new 300mm prime.
The guy told me Olympus is basically the only mirrorless gear they sell and reliably stock.
I'd like to know how m4/3 sales do worldwide, I really like the LUMIX system but it seems like it could be killed off at any time.
>>3124753
Fuck no. They're the most innovative guys in the market.
>>3124769
They get a huge markup for selling meme4/3 gear. Manufacturers like Fujifilm and Sony practice good business relations with consumers by limiting the profit margin of retailers. That's why retailers push meme4/3 hard down to our throats. But good thing we know better.
A thread of photos to look at
Just bought one of these at a thrift store and want to make slides out of some used film from disposable cameras that I have laying around. After doing some brief research, I was probably gonna do E-6. Would that work to make slides? Also I've never processed film before. And would I be able to turn the processed film into prints after? Any advice?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Model LG-H872 Equipment Make LG Electronics Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2017:08:07 21:59:44 Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Orientation Right-Hand, Top Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Altitude 0.00 m Color Space Information sRGB F-Number f/1.8 Focal Length 4.03 mm Exposure Mode Auto Image Height 2080 Scene Capture Type Standard Digital Zoom Ratio 2.0 Exposure Program Not Defined White Balance Auto Image Width 4160 Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash Flash, Compulsory Exposure Bias 0 EV Brightness 0 EV ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Time 1/30 sec
Stop making these random bullshit threads
How is this a bullshit thread? I'm asking for advice on developing film, you aggro twat.
Besides most of whats on here is is masochistic masturbatory "critique me please" threads or dick measuring gear threads which help nobody since there is no overall best camera (objectively).
A little while ago, I bought a lumix gx85. I brought it on vacation and have been taking a lot of pictures with it but I just don't like any that I take. I used to use my parents' old dslr and I loved the pictures I could take. However, I upgraded for 4K but have somewhat regretted it. I think I might start to use it only as a video camera since I like some of the videos I take. The point is that regardless of subject, I'd enjoy to look at more pictures I took with the Nikon dslr than this m43 mirrorless. I was sort of wondering why this could be. I heard someone else on this board say that dslr and m43 have very different aesthetics, which from my experience with the two is something I'd agree with. I'm mostly wondering if anyone has any info on this topic or have experienced similar things.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 650 Image Height 240 Scene Capture Type Standard
I'm no expert, but maybe it's because Panasonic has shit lenses?
>>3129166
nice subtle troll post
There are only 3 things that could be happening (if you aren't a troll which you are.)
>1. Nikon cooks jpgs in camera different
If you are a faggot that shoots jpg you might get different renderings on the jpgs vs the jpgs on a different camera but this can be really easily fixed on the raw file
>2. doesn't understand crop factor
My guess would be someone not knowing crop factor and going "why does a 50mm on x look different than on y"
>3. muh bokah
Cheap DSLR lenses tend to get shallower DoF than cheap M43 lenses. It is easier to get muh shallow dof using a 50 mm f1.8 on a aspc sensor than a 45 mm f1.8 on a m43.
But you can get pretty good DoF with Voigtlander, Mitikon, PannyLeica, or higher grade olympus lenses like the 75mm
>>3129172
I'm using a Nikon lens with an adapter but I do definitely think that crop factor could have something to do with it. It's kind of hard to explain the differences that I'm spotting but if it makes any sense, lights look different on the two cameras
How the FUCK do I get good at photohraphy?
The technical side is easy, you can learn that in an afternoon. You can even study examples of fine art with composition notes to get a feel for the artistic side. But most of that is being in the right place at the right time, situationally aware, and leaving your basement.
>>3128122
Keep taking pictures it doesn't happen over night. The more you work at it the more it improves.
Your first 10,000 shots are your worst.
btfo /p/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 645
I use both film and vsco filters
I have no shame
>>3126143
Why not take a photo with film then apply the vsco filter of that film to the photo?