Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 243. page

I wonder why white skin is so thin.

>>2983216
good one

>>2983223

Better than your post, Mr. Fragile.

File: Millionthtimethread_zps26d6c3e3.jpg (91KB, 556x312px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 556x312px

oh hey it's this thread again

Never. There's too many differences. Shit, the film door on an AE-1 is different from an F-1.

Especially now that mirrorless allow for any lens to be adapted...35mm SLR film backs would be pretty pointless.

>>2983191
>keeping the focal plane farther back than "compact" mirrorless
>pointless
Check yourself before you wreck yourself pal

>>2983005
There's a lot more to a photograph than camera settings and mediocre, over-saturated, post-processing.

>>2983005
I hate everything about this, if all you want to do is point and click, use a smart phone, why would anyone pay $99 dollars a month for exactly the same thing?

The fact that you can't even choose what you think are your best photo's really pisses me off too, who decides? An AI? What's the algorithm to decide what makes a good photo?

Also, the editing on those snaps are bad, same old cookie cutter hipster shit.

>>2983005
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

When they said AI, they meant a bunch of pajeets sliding the sliders and dodge and burning.

File: ---_0321.jpg (561KB, 2996x2000px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 2996x2000px

>>2982603

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	RB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:07 17:27:26
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2996
Image Height	2000

File: _0A_0229.jpg (564KB, 2996x2000px) Image search: [Google]

564KB, 2996x2000px

>>2982603

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	AgfaPhoto GmbH
Camera Model	d-lab.2/3
Camera Software	RB98k or later from AgfaPhoto GmbH d-lab.2/3
Photographer	Only the Best :-))
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	400 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:03 16:37:50
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2996
Image Height	2000

File: 78972729.jpg (761KB, 5184x3456px) Image search: [Google]

761KB, 5184x3456px

>>2982603
I will be posting some of my early digital shots as well.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5i
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Macintosh)
Photographer	192032017826
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:07 17:09:32
Exposure Time	1/2000 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Partial
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2982535
1012

File: Group 1.jpg (1MB, 1454x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1454x1000px

>>2982540
Alright, here we go.

Some are over 1MB for some odd reason, may be that I was lazy and forgot to adjust DPI after scanning.

first

File: TriX003009.jpg (684KB, 1350x900px) Image search: [Google]

684KB, 1350x900px

>>2982355
end your life

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 550D
Camera Software	Digital Photo Professional
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2014:04:21 10:05:52
Exposure Time	0.7 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	100.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1350
Image Height	900
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Screen Shot 2014-04-21 at 20.51.06.png (291KB, 828x553px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 828x553px

>>2982353
I've got an old Voigtländer 6*9 Bessa which has an option to shoot 4,5*6 but I don't have the insert to do so.
Apparently it's just kind of a stencil that one puts inside the camera. Has anyone got an idea on how I could make one myself?

Your best bet would be finding a company (preferably one aimed at your audience) and hitting them up to see if they want to run ads over your account, if you actually have 100k followers and set a reasonable price, I'm sure they'll crumble in your hands. P.S What's your account @?

>>2982330
Many companies should be interested in my audience, I think. It's anything fitness related. I don't know what's a reasonable price for 100k? I tried to look it up but there really isn't much info on it especially since I'm not a personal "blog"

Well, usually in business you start low with a new client to draw them in and keep them coming, instead of just one payment I'd recommend something like $15 a post. The company paying will choose when they want you to post. As you grow, make your prices go up gradually. Maybe suggest getting a discount code from the company to give to your fans more incentive to buy

noise/10

It's pretty bad. If you were going to center the moon, center the damn moon. Also, the noise is way the fuck out there, the horizon is not level, and assuming this is digital, raising the lower halves shadows would give some nice detail.

>>2982255
a blind man could take a better picture

I checked it. Your first three sections looks basically the same. lost interest in the sixth photo of the first section.

Also, the demonstration part has some junkies smoking weed, i already think you are a junkie.

You could put most of those three under urban life and it would make no difference. definitely too many photos.

Try recategorizing and trimming down the fat, you have some solid images here and there.

Olar,

did you used 'portfolio box' as your engine? You site looks clean and it's nice to see. Maybe for a portfolio site it has too much, maybe if you select only the essential would attract more attention.

funny thing, I'm also from SP and just did my 'portfolio' today, as I'm searching for a job again
http://www.chiereguini.portfoliobox.net/
I would appreciate if you give me some opinion and even feed back

thx

>>2982016

>I checked it. Your first three sections looks basically the same. lost interest in the sixth photo of the first section.

Hmm... "Demonstrations" and "Urban Life" are really similar indeed. Not sure about "University Joy" though.
I think you are right, anyway. I felt the need to do separated sections here because "Demonstrations" is the nearest section I have from photojounalism, whereas "Urban Life" is... well, more free, I think.

But the idea of cutting off something like 70% of "Demonstrations" (which is by far the largest section) and something from "Urban Life" is growing in my mind.

>Also, the demonstration part has some junkies smoking weed, i already think you are a junkie.

Hahah, I'm kind of the opposite, actually. Never smoked anything and, hell, I don't even drink. I'm not very fond of those images to be honest; I may keep them, but put them between the last ones in that gallery.


Thanks for the help!


>>2982024

It's actually SquareSpace ("Wells" template). Took me a while to make it the way I wanted -- very clean, as you said.

Will take a closer look at your site and report back.

File: X1009345.jpg (477KB, 1000x542px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 1000x542px

2/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:19:29
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: X1009293.jpg (701KB, 783x1000px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 783x1000px

3/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:19:25
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: X1009289.jpg (408KB, 1000x551px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1000x551px

4/10

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:11 22:19:23
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2981932
>ls using VSCO mobiIe fiIters now considered normaI?

WeII being a Iazy, tremendous faggot has become the norm, so yes it is normaI. lt's aIso, again, Iazy as fuck and it's ridicuIous since 99 % of these faggots get on their Iaptops Iater anyway.

EasiIy Iess than 1 % of the peopIe using this are "out in the fieId" in severe need of sending out fiIter pics A S A P.

lt's just faggots trying to be artsy when they aren't bIowing out oranges and highIights and crushing bIacks for sunset pics in between two buiIdings with some shitty quote under it.

VSCO is great if you want all of your photos to look like everyone else's and also to look painfully like they were made in 2014.

I think it's pretty useful for pictures when you're travelling

When I have access to a laptop, I just use Lightroom/PS, because I can get better results with that

File: meteringzones.jpg (333KB, 700x629px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 700x629px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2012:05:30 15:21:35
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	700
Image Height	629

>>2981554
Macro lens
Good lighting
Maybe a touch of HDR?

>>2981481
Literally who?

>>2981484
Grammar nerds everywhere have long lamented the widespread misuse of the word "literally."

As anyone who paid attention in grade school knows, "literally" means "in a literal or strict sense, as opposed to a non-literal or exaggerated sense," and is the opposite of "figuratively," which means "in a metaphorical sense." But recently, it's become in vogue to use "literally" for emphasis in precisely the non-literal sense, as in, "We were literally killing ourselves laughing."

"My impression is that many people don't have any idea of what 'literally' means," Boston University psycholinguist Jean Berko Gleason told the Boston Globe. "So they say things like 'He was literally insane with jealousy.' If in response, you asked them if this person had been institutionalized, they'd look at you as if you were the crazy one."

>>2981598
you seem not to have any sense of humour.

science

Lots of retries.

>>2981209
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GyVx28R9-s