Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 209. page

so he strobed the fuck out of a foetuss developing eyelets leaving it blind for the rest of his life?

it was a different time, i guess.

F

>>3011404
theyre abortions

Boring.
Get closer and find a better subject.

File: DSC00093.jpg (1MB, 6000x3376px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 6000x3376px

>>3009087
Heres a different one a little closer

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	315 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:25 15:44:46
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Brightness	11.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	210.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3009087
>>3009092
I think you should resize

Real talk though, the A7 has the ergonomics of a soap bar.

what you laffin at

>>3003697
isnt the whole thing about m43's that its supposed to be """"""""compact"""""""" ?

>>2967439
All that sounds good. However the main thing is the sky at your location.

If you live in buckfuk nowhere it's cool. Anywhere near a city (lights) not so much.

Still cool, give it a go. Better than taking a photo of your cat.

>>2967439
>if I were to be able to get a Nikon d7000
A D7000 will work. and its a fine camera for non-astro purposes, too.
>with a rokinon 135 mm lens
Great lens for things large enough to make its field of view appropriate. Sharp with low coma and CAs, even wide open, and wide open is f/2.0, which is pretty blazing fast for this. But you probably will find yourself wanting a longer lens, depending on the objects you want to hunt.
>and a sky watcher star adventurer
looks okay as an entry level mount. but if you later decide you want to bolt a proper telescope to the thing, it's rather undersized. It'll handle a DSLR and any lens that's light enough that you'd be able to hand-hold, but it won't give you much room to grow. Serious astro people commonly spend more on the mount than on a telescope. Long-exposure photography is great at showing up small guiding problems that are too small to notice with naked-eye observing.

Other thoughts:
Consider adding DeepSkyStacker to your software setup. It's finicky and a pain to use, but stacking 50 exposures by hand in photoshop is a pain.
I feel obligated to mention Pentax and their Astrotracer gizmo. It simulates an equatorial mount by linking the sensor-shift stabilization to a GPS receiver. It works, but most decidedly not as well as a real equatorial mount.
Like >>2967460 mentioned your success at any of this is dependent on having a decently dark sky. If you aren't prepared to drive several hours to the middle of nowhere, you're liable to not be able to see much in the sky.

File: Catalina single frame.jpg (349KB, 1000x665px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 1000x665px

>>2968558
>I feel obligated to mention Pentax and their Astrotracer gizmo...

I feel obligated to chime in... I have one. It works, but don't expect miracles from it. It can be very limiting in exposure (you can pretty much half the calculated exposure time) and calibrating it before using can be a hassle with big lens.
A well aligned tracking mount can do much more but then again it costs a lot more not to mention the needed telescope and software. It is better than cheap (read sub $1000) Go-To mounts though if used correctly.
It is very sensitive on the tripod and head design on minimizing wobble. Pic related was made with a 400mm lens on a cheap tripod and plastic 3D head.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	600 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:29 13:29:26
Exposure Time	40 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	400.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>3012542
Changing those things won't make a difference for contrast.

>>3012556

What does it make them?

>>3012556

It will determine how much light gets into the sensor, and, avoiding overexposing the brightest pieces of the cloud, it kind of makes a difference for the contrast.

So, my question is, what's the best option to get the best of the lights and darks of a cloud without any blow out the highlights?

cant you just copy all the files into one folder and then just sort by date of file creation? how many subfolders are there?

also I bet that lightroom or something similar can import all photos off a device and arrange them in folders by the date in the EXIF automatically, but i'm not 100% sure how to do that since I don't take/backup phone pics like that.

>>3012319
The problem is that the "date of creation" becomes the date of copying for some reason, making all files "created" at the same time... And I just lost my lightroom license, getting a new as soon as my university seals the deal though

>>3012323
sounds to me like the solution is definitely some sort of import/library manager (like lightroom) that can read EXIF and use it to sort your photos. maybe there is some alternative to lightroom that you can use while you wait for a new license - or if you're a little tech savvy, you could probably even write some sort of lightweight bash script that would just rename each file according to its EXIF date/time info. looks like this dude was working on something similar: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26963377/bash-script-to-read-exif-rename-jpg-files-and-check-output-if-file-exit-crea

>>3012108
no

>>3012108
>50€
no, just google it you goober

havent found any results, i tried looking up for most common olympus cameras but it havent worked. Also if you have nothing to say to help me, why comment? not being mean just saying man were chill

File: 10001_24A (12).jpg (2MB, 2005x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2005x3024px

Shot on a Canon AV-1

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:24 16:14:59
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2005
Image Height	3024

File: IMG_4864.jpg (3MB, 3911x1630px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3911x1630px

Even though it's from my phone, I like this photo I took in Cambodia.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3911
Image Height	1630
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: DSC_0106.jpg (4MB, 3872x2592px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3872x2592px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D60
Camera Software	Ver.1.01
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.3
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	836
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	69 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2015:08:01 19:47:49
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/5.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Cloudy Weather
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	46.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3872
Image Height	2592
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown
ISO Speed Used	200
Color Mode	COLOR
Image Quality	FINE
White Balance	CLOUDY
Image Sharpening	AUTO
Focus Mode	AF-C
Flash Setting	NORMAL
Flash Compensation	0.0 EV
ISO Speed Requested	200
Tone Compensation	AUTO
Lens Type	Nikon D Series
Lens Range	18.0 - 55.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6
Auto Focus	Dynamic Area, Center Selected, Top Focused
Shooting/Bracketing Mode	Single Frame/Off
Color Mode	Landscape sRGB
Lighting Type	NATURAL
Noise Reduction	OFF
Camera Actuations	4821
Image Optimization	NORMAL
Saturation 2	AUTO

File: IMG_3507.jpg (39KB, 750x722px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 750x722px

>>3011951
Bump

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Image Width	750
Image Height	722

File: IMG_3508.jpg (62KB, 750x712px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 750x712px

Please help

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Image Width	750
Image Height	712

White backdrop and a bunch of lights.

File: 0G3A9171.jpg (930KB, 3092x3929px) Image search: [Google]

930KB, 3092x3929px

>>3011681
didnt mean to post the one with the writing on it

here's 2/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:01:28 22:14:44
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 0G3A9197.jpg (492KB, 4903x3594px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 4903x3594px

3/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:01:28 22:12:03
Exposure Time	30 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/10.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3011681
Poor composition. Hey, look a bridge. In the center of the frame. Boring.

>>3011682
Could be a good image but the foreground which takes up 1/3 of the frame and could arguably be the main subject of the image is an indiscernible stain on the sidewalk.

>>3011683
Level your horizon. Also poor composition.

6/10

Concept is interesting but bottom half is too dark. Should have waited for better lighting.

File: PicsArt_01-28-02.43.18.jpg (186KB, 1803x1202px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1803x1202px

>>3011659

How about this one?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	PicsArt Photo Studio
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	0
Image Height	0

>>3011662
i like the ideia but maybe u could have focused it on the log a litlle better nontheless its still a nice shot 7/10

$2000 for a 20MP quarter frame?
I'd rather spend $600 on ANY apsc but Canon and get a whole new level of performance.

And I even shoot MFT

>>3011063
>canon sensor

bad bait

Do you actually take photos or do you just masturbate over your camera

>>3011024
it would if it the person was interesting of if it had any presence, but it isnt and doesnt. its a dumb scrawny faggot kid.

for that composition to work, you need a fat person dressed in light clothes. as it is, the subject is absorbed by the thick lines and background.

>>3011024
>>3011025
Like this anon said, the skateboarder ruins it. Tbh with just the little girl there this would have been a great shot.

Composition doesn't matter.

File: cactusflower.jpg (190KB, 686x456px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 686x456px

That it is. Here is one in the wild.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.9
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	962
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2015:05:21 19:31:23
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	686
Image Height	456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: opwhatisthis.png (314KB, 400x700px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 400x700px

>>3010986

>>3010986
>cropped the top
>shitty fake plants in the back, why bother?
>no dof
>shitty flash
0/10

Lubitel 166

You can google the rest yourself

http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Lubitel_166_Universal

File: 14617534807600.jpg (43KB, 420x280px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 420x280px

2ch /p/
for all your Russian photography needs