[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 191. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Am I retarded or just retarded? I'm trying to get Lightroom with this method

http://free.appnee.com/adobe-cc-2014-2015-all-products-universal-keygen-crack-patch/

But I'm not seeing the same stuff on the instructions whenever I download Adobe CC (the Install, Sign in, Connect later parts, looks different for me). WTF am I doing wrong?
12 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
Yeah, here's a better method.

$9.99 a month and you get LR and PS all the most recent versions, don't be a cheapo pirate.
>>
>>3028381
what if I cannot afford that due to third world subhuman standards?¿
Different guy here btw
>>
>>3028381

OP here. I ended up doing that. I spend so much more than $9.99 in a week on bullshit, that little bit of money a month really isn't much

File: clarity.jpg (427KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]
clarity.jpg
427KB, 1024x683px
I recently was gifted three Nikon lenses. Can't delve further but know it's not theft. I'm looking into two options; 1. Get a film camera to utilize the lenses. 2. Get a dSLR <$1000 3. Get an adapter for my Canon dSLRs and not have autofocus or aperture control.

What should I do (selling them is NOT an option) and to #2. any recommendations given the budget?

Thank in advance

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:10:10 13:39:36
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/11.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/11.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1024
Image Height683
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
17 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
*looking into one of three options (derp)
>>
>>3028208
Sell all your Canon gear and upgrade to Nikon, duh.
>>
>>3028208
What nikon lenses?

File: IMG_20170203_074700_984.jpg (1MB, 2240x2799px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170203_074700_984.jpg
1MB, 2240x2799px
All Kodak ektar on rz67 unless otherwise stated
18 posts and 14 images submitted.
>>
File: IMG_20170213_151544_690.jpg (2MB, 2285x2857px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170213_151544_690.jpg
2MB, 2285x2857px
>>
File: IMG_20170210_075055_309.jpg (2MB, 2285x2857px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170210_075055_309.jpg
2MB, 2285x2857px
>>
File: IMG_20170207_074204_114.jpg (2MB, 2285x2285px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20170207_074204_114.jpg
2MB, 2285x2285px

File: IMG_2868.jpg (2MB, 3456x5184px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2868.jpg
2MB, 3456x5184px
Post your new photos for critique. b nice.

Old thread >>3025234

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS REBEL T5i
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:02:22 18:26:29
Exposure Time1/80 sec
F-Numberf/3.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/3.2
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
15 posts and 14 images submitted.
>>
File: DSC01902.jpg (841KB, 5456x3632px) Image search: [Google]
DSC01902.jpg
841KB, 5456x3632px
>>3027012

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-3000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/5.6
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)82 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:02:23 13:41:43
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/10.0
Brightness6.0 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length55.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: DSC01166.jpg (808KB, 3872x2048px) Image search: [Google]
DSC01166.jpg
808KB, 3872x2048px
>>3027238

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-3000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:02:23 13:41:21
Exposure Time1/1600 sec
F-Numberf/4.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.0
Brightness9.6 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length27.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
>>
File: DSC01930.jpg (5MB, 5456x3632px) Image search: [Google]
DSC01930.jpg
5MB, 5456x3632px
>>3027239

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeSONY
Camera ModelILCE-3000
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.5
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:02:23 12:43:04
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating400
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Brightness5.9 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal

File: 7598-005.jpg (441KB, 1818x1228px) Image search: [Google]
7598-005.jpg
441KB, 1818x1228px
I'm a novice trying to improve my film photography

I live in Australia and I'm being ruined by film development costs ($20 - $30 per roll including scans)

I can't decide whether to keep forking out to the lab or start developing at home

what kind of tank should I buy? do I need stainless steel or is a plastic tank okay?

what do I do with the negs once they're done? do I just take them to a lab? that'll still cost me $10-$15 for scans

my plan so far is:

>using stand development technique
>placing the tank in a cooler full of water @ 20deg celsius
>Compard R09 developer and Ilford Rapid Fixer

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSP-3000
Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:07:08 14:34:43
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1818
Image Height1228
11 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
Bumperino
>>
>>3026758
fuck you man don't bump my thread
>>
>using stand development technique
Don't do this, unless you really want to risk haloing.

>plastic vs metal
I like to use metal (Hewes) for 120 and plastic for 35mm. A pro with metal is that you can use it while it's still wet. A con with metal is that heat from you hands transfer more easily to the tank. Just be aware of that when you agitate.

>what do I do with the negs once they're done?
Put them in something like this:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/42995-REG/Print_File_PF357BXW100_Archival_Storage_Page_for.html

File: images.jpg (8KB, 292x150px) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
8KB, 292x150px
Old thread >>3022311

This is the Film General Thread: "Long Exposure" Edition.

This is a place to post about anything film related. Processing, scanning, developing, gear, etc is all fair game.

Have fun! Remember, there are no stupid questions, only stupid answers.
321 posts and 96 images submitted.
>>
File: Unknown-2.jpg (115KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
Unknown-2.jpg
115KB, 1280x720px
posting here because new thread

Got my first rangefinder, a Hi-Matic 7s for about 4$. it seems to be in an "average-good" shape, shutter works in all speeds (seems a bit rough about winding, if i don't wind all the way up shutter doesn't fire) and it seems to even have a working meter. lens seems to be a bit scratched but i guess i don't gonna know how good or bad it is until a try a roll of film.
Also, the aperture and shutter speed rings are a bit hard to manipulate, are they supposed to be smooth? and being my first rangefinder, it is supposed to be so quiet?
My other 35mm is a rebranded Cosina C1 and certainly is loud when firing, with this one i think it makes more noise pressing the shutter button than actually the shutter working.
any tips here?
>>
Anyone watched Azriel Knights latest videos? He's been doing experiments on agitation and I was quite surprised by the results. There was virtually no difference on the aggressiveness of the agitation (gentle, normal, vigorous), and then when he did the frequency test it turned out that doing no agitation makes for a pretty low contrast image, but the difference between normal agitation and continuous agitation was much, much smaller than you'd expect. This was with HC110 and TX400. Kind of throws into sharp relief how lenient you can be with black and white developing and still get a usable image.

The videos are a little long but the tests are pretty good, he shows the results at the end.
Agitation speed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Uu1-KNHAhE
Agitation frequency (this is the better of the two vids): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iDcggT3l0I
>>
File: Holga_120n.jpg (600KB, 2500x2500px) Image search: [Google]
Holga_120n.jpg
600KB, 2500x2500px
Could I get some thoughts on the Holga 120? Like why is it praised so much, even by people who don't fit the hipster mold?

File: 4523.jpg (5MB, 4000x2709px) Image search: [Google]
4523.jpg
5MB, 4000x2709px
>considering using film again after a long time, for some long exposure work
>research about different emulsions
>check flickr to see peoples results
>almost all photos are mundane, very boring, uninspired garbage, 90% is literal test shot tier

Here is one example, this is supposed to be a film for very "serious" photographers btw:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/1444945@N21/pool/


When I open a flickr pool of a random ancient or entry level DSLR I see much more decent shots. Why are filmfags, at least on flickr, so overwhelmingly bad? Also, why do non hipsters waste their money and time on analogue snapshits?
12 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
>>3026084
probably because they're much older and therefore more boring
there are still lots of photographers shooting interesting photos on film
>>
because we needed another digital vs. film dick measuring thread on the board.
>>
>>3026084
Worry about your own art

File: 725790670e7625914a164154e7c61904.jpg (561KB, 1620x866px) Image search: [Google]
725790670e7625914a164154e7c61904.jpg
561KB, 1620x866px
Can you guys stop making generals for every single thing

I know you really want to know what kind of camera is best to take pictures if your rectum but you don't need a general for that.

>drone general
>night club geneeral

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
20 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
shitposting general itt
>>
>Cries about general threads
>also cries about personal photo threads
can I lubricate my tears with yours?
>>
>>3023021
what's your favourite sandwich?
I've been getting into banana lately

File: image.jpg (244KB, 1707x960px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
244KB, 1707x960px
What is the best photography channel on youtube?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1707
Image Height960
Scene Capture TypeStandard
49 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>3021667

depends on what you're into. I personally think bigheadtaco has a good balance of gear reviews and actually taking photos.

negativefeedback, matt day and nick carver if you're into shooting film.

the camera store tv is the only gear review youotube I can stand for more than 5 minutes. with tony and chelsea and art of photography in a close second.

the art of photography has good content as well but can be a bit drawn out and sometimes he rambles.
>>
>>3021667
Thecamerastore and (old) digitalrev for reviews
Negativefeedback for comfy

Don't watch gear reviews, it just gets toxic and most gear videos are boring.
>>
Are there any more channels like Digital Rev that's more focused on stupid shit and entertainment that actually being informative?

File: img__film02.png (86KB, 272x323px) Image search: [Google]
img__film02.png
86KB, 272x323px
Hey, /p/ I'm thinking about getting an instant camera, should I get the mini 90 or wait for fuji to release the new square meme format this spring?

>pic related

Buying a real polaroid is also an option but the price of a pack keeps me away from it.
14 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>3019549
hate to break it to you but this is obviously just a regular photo with a shopped border. instant cameras generally have meh iq, unless you're shoointng pack film through a medium format or something.

wait for the sqaure, since hopefully they might get smart and release an actual camera this time around instead of the plastic fantastic, babby teir shit that instax has been so far.

>I type this as I cling on to my instax for dear life
>>
>>3019555
Pack film is not that good either.

>release an actual camera this time around instead of the plastic fantastic
The point is to trick people into buy a cheap camera and waste money on film, isn't it?
>>
>>3019549
I like the mini classic 90 alot and I would highly recommend getting one just to have fun with. I got mine as a Christmas gift and I have already filled up a few albums so far.
Now, I'm not a serious photographer so I am easy to please. It is far from perfect when it comes to film prices and the quality of shots but honestly I'm happy with it.

If money is not an issue I would get the mini 90 or if you would like to try out a cheaper option then you can get the mini 70. Costco has a good bundle for the 70 if you can find it.

Its just a whole lot of fun to take pictures and instantly share them with other people. Plus the photos have a charm to them that people seem to gravitate too. Maybe because we are so use to digital cameras and images now.

I'm going to pick up a Square when it comes out but I think there is room for both in any collection.

Is Leica any good for video?
24 posts and 6 images submitted.
>>
lmfao
>>
>>3028028
yes, the new M10 shoots in 4k
>>
File: D3S_0517-1200.jpg (251KB, 1200x858px) Image search: [Google]
D3S_0517-1200.jpg
251KB, 1200x858px
>>3028031
>>3028034
Some of them do shoot video you cunts, see M240.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:

File: 20161010-10102016_Dragon_Statues.jpg (649KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]
20161010-10102016_Dragon_Statues.jpg
649KB, 667x1000px
I finished editing this picture in Lightroom, and all is well except for a small problem at the bottom of the photo. You should notice it almost immediately. The bottom seems a bit distracting to me, but I'd like to know what other people think. Is it a real issue, and what are some ways that I could fix it? I'm very critical of my work, and I feel I may be overthinking it -

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D5200
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.4 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/4.6
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)45 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:02:23 18:16:20
Exposure Time1/3200 sec
F-Numberf/5.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating1600
Lens Aperturef/5.0
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length30.00 mm
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlHigh Gain Up
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
24 posts and 9 images submitted.
>>
I think you aren't being critical ENOUGH if you're devoting this much thought and energy into a snapshot like this.
>>
>>3027679
There's a bit of room for improvement, I take it?
>>
File: dragons.jpg (311KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]
dragons.jpg
311KB, 667x1000px
>>3027666
>overthinking it
yes

Desaturating the floor and cloning out the weed may help to keep the eye on the dragons though. Shitty attempt on my part but hey.

File: DSCF5221.jpg (269KB, 1200x950px) Image search: [Google]
DSCF5221.jpg
269KB, 1200x950px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-E1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3933
Image Height3113
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:02:23 19:10:35
Exposure Time1/600 sec
F-Numberf/22.0
Exposure ProgramAperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating1000
Lens Aperturef/22.0
Brightness8.7 EV
Exposure Bias-2 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height950
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
28 posts and 13 images submitted.
>>
File: nn.jpg (191KB, 1200x676px) Image search: [Google]
nn.jpg
191KB, 1200x676px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-E1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)38 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4896
Image Height2760
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2017:02:23 19:22:07
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/10.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating2500
Lens Aperturef/10.0
Brightness0.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length25.40 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1200
Image Height676
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: DSCF2404.jpg (563KB, 1200x822px) Image search: [Google]
DSCF2404.jpg
563KB, 1200x822px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-E1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4766
Image Height3264
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:02:23 19:18:32
Exposure Time1/100 sec
F-Numberf/11.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating3200
Lens Aperturef/11.0
Brightness-1.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height822
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: 1.jpg (589KB, 1200x696px) Image search: [Google]
1.jpg
589KB, 1200x696px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJIFILM
Camera ModelX-E1
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4786
Image Height2774
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2017:02:23 19:24:41
Exposure Time1/60 sec
F-Numberf/8.0
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating3200
Lens Aperturef/8.0
Brightness1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length18.80 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1200
Image Height696
RenderingCustom
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown

>hurr let's make a mirrorless camera
>hurr let's make the mount the same size of a DSLR
38 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
>>3027184
There are lens elements in there.
>>
What you take out of the body has to be added back in the lens.
>>
File: 1487520528916.png (112KB, 510x778px) Image search: [Google]
1487520528916.png
112KB, 510x778px
>>3027184
>>3027215

But it isn't?

Also there is a /gear/ thread, you should go shitpost there.

File: 1468744770404.jpg (1MB, 2302x1750px) Image search: [Google]
1468744770404.jpg
1MB, 2302x1750px
Hello /p/ I am doing all the research into buying my first DLSR camera, and narrowed it down to the Nikon d7100, or the d7200 - I also don't understand lenses that well if you guys can make it simple, i get the basics of dof relating to the f stop etc.
22 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>3026548

Disregard bodies, acquire glass.

If you don't know what youre doing dont waste your money on a 7 series Nikon, buy a D3300 and decent glass and learn.
>>
I am set on that body dude, any ideas for lenses: portraits and landscapes!
>>
>>3026575
then you're dumb.
It has a similar sensor, you're essentially just paying for bells and whistles that you're not good enough to fully utilize.

plus, spending more on a lens means you won't have to cheap out on the thing that actually affects image quality, not the same whatever cmos shit.

portrait lens: a 50mm will usually do it, could get an 80mm which is more dedicated to portrait.

landscapes you want a wide, maybe 28-35, or ultra like 18mm if you're into that. most zoom lenses go this low.

bear in mind because of the smaller sensor there will be a crop on all lenses not designed for that sensor, so if you buy a lens meant for a full frame camera, your image is cut off a bit.

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [181] [182] [183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] [191] [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.