Thoughts on this camera for a beginner? Lookin for a cheap 35mm point and shoot within the $50-200 range.
It's a good cam. The flash is annoying sometimes though
>>3067166
Oh what's the problem with the flash?
For that price, go for the Ricoh GR1v.
Why can't digital into color like this? Why is it often instantly obvious a photo was taken on film or digital? What is it that prevents digital from looking as pleasing as film? I don't think it's just a bias or nostalgia.
because the people who designed the emulsions are better than most people at editing raws
also because that image has godlike light in the perfect direction against nice appealing objects
>>3065092
Well shouldn't there be digital photographers able to find the right lighting and have good editing skills?
>>3065095
There are but this is all irrelevant to you since this is just a bait thread anyway
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2010:10:18 15:24:22 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1800 Image Height 1463
>>3062373
Manatees go in the wildlife thread
>>3062373
what filter to get this effect
Tips for taking portrait photography?
use a camera
>>3073396
Think of the picture you want, and take the steps necessary to get that picture.
>>3073396
Find the best portraits, then imitate them.
Is VSCO (speaking of the LR presets) seen as a tool for plebs around here?
Personally speaking, I dicked around with LR and PS for years trying to get my digitals looking like what I liked from my own and others' film photos. In comes VSCO and gets me exactly what I wanted. Of course Silver Efex Pro had been doing the same thing for years, for B&W, and I only figured that out when I tried it after it went free.
Of course, I learned a lot in the process of all that dicking around, and I don't regret it.
>>3073009
>Is VSCO (speaking of the LR presets) seen as a tool for plebs around here?
Everything short of large format film cameras is seen around pleb around here, so that's not a good question to ask. And obviously each person will say something different.
With that being said, I use VSCO kinda often. I do my own edits, but it's helped on a few shots where I just couldn't get the color right, so I'd just skim through some of them find one that was close to what I wanted and made changes to it. And it actually did teach me how to use some of the more complex tools in Lightroom. I'd say go for it, but don't use it as a crutch for your photos
>>3073009
Memepresets only for total losers.
Hence I always use them.
>>3073009
No worse than instagram filters senpai
Actually a bit better, now that I think about it.
However! VSCO is a lot less jarring if you shoot with specific filters in mind, so the more work you put in, the better your shot will be.
...a lot like everything else really.
I'm new(ish) to film, and I recently got an old Olympus AF1-Twin camera working again, so I shot a couple of rolls of poundland film (agfa vista 200) with it last week.
Unfortunately the scans I got from the developer were not very good at all, I'm currently experimenting with DSLR scanning so I'll see how that goes.
But for now, have these from the developer in all their low res crusty quality
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1840 Image Height 1232
Fug, forgot to resize!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:05:09 19:26:27 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 670
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:05:09 19:27:51 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 670
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:05:09 19:35:26 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 670
What are some of the more aesthetic cities/countries for photos?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD. Camera Model SP-2000 Camera Software FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER350/370-7.0-0E-868 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:04:28 13:21:07 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1840 Image Height 1232
All of them.
>>3072495
Ex-Yugoslavia
>>3072495
Are you planning a trip? You'll need to provide more info for a real suggestion.
did anyone here ever go to college for photography ? if not is it because you are too poor to afford a fashionable accessory degree , or too scared to put real prints in front of real people for real critique ??
Neither to poor, nor to scared. I just don't care.
>>3072093
>too scared to put real prints in front of real people for real critique ??
Page, I've sat in on photoschool crits. It's a bigger backpatting circle jerk than Flickr. Art school crits are all cotton candy and soft blankets.
Go to architecture school if you want ego-shattering critiques. I've heard seen working professionals tell students they should just drop out.
>>3072128
that's badass
Is Fujifilm really as bad as you guys make it out to be?
no its the best mirrorless system right now
Fuji film sure isn't
>>3071890
Great LF lenses, good MF lenses
Shit cameras since they abandoned the Super CCD
good colour film
shit B&W film
great but discontinued pull apart Polaroid film
how the fuck do I take night sky pics like these
I literally used exactly the same settings and camera on a remote location in the polar circle and it looked like horse shit
Specs like these are almost irrelevant since stuff like this has been worked over so thoroughly in post.
In other words, boost your shadows my man.
>>3071805
Why would you want to waste your time with the most played-out area of photography: astrophotography
>>3071858
this isn't astrophotography, it's landscape photography with some stars in it.
I'm trying to get into street photography
I'm gonna post some of my snapshits
Opinions are appreciated
Sank u~
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3621 Image Height 2414 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3071498
Some market back in Seoul
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2619 Image Height 3492 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3071499
Top of Maokong in Taipei
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4032 Image Height 3024 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3071502
Does portraiture ever have any merit?
This was my first roll of film, Tmax400 in some shitty point and shoot, and my favourite shot is actually some portrait of my grandpa
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3936 Image Height 2624 Scene Capture Type Standard
If you say that photography is and art, then you will have to admit that using an scanner is also an art.
People will point out that in order to take photos you need to frame correctly the image you want.
We could say the same with scanners, if you need to put the paper in the right direction or in the right frame to get the image you want.
I just EXPOSED how you all are artists wannabe!
I honestly want to do a gallery exhibition of just xeroxed asses.
>>3071058
Are you telling me that arranging things on a scanner in very interesting and compelling ways, then hitting the scan button is not art? Because it could very well be a great concept if done well
>>3071058
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanography
Has this guy ever taken a good photo?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1280 Image Height 720 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3070934
Maybe not, but at least he's not as annoying as jew knows photo.
His shots in the double exposure video were pretty interesting.
>>3070934
His videos make me raff at reast.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Ver.1.01 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Left-Hand, Bottom Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:04:26 20:18:31 Exposure Time 1/25 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 6000 Image Height 4000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>3070934
He actually do some pretty decent landscapes
It's just that his videos at drtv had to follow the format of him walking the streets of Hong Kong, so all he could shoot was le trolleys
is it autism /p/? he seems to be off the rails nowadays.
http://erickimphotography.com/blog/2017/05/05/fuck-lifestyle/
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:05:01 12:38:43 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3670 Image Height 2406
he just prove himself to be a /p/ lurker. lol
I remember some of those arguments in some threads
>>3070753
>2017
>caring what some ugly gook has to say
You're never going to make it brah.
>>3070756
http://erickimphotography.com/blog/2017/05/05/how-to-ignore-your-haters/
looks like it
Could someone guide me on how to get this kind of look. What kind of post processing or software is required for this ?
Large aperture lens (f1.4 - 1.8), Photoshop and some curves and tint fuckery.
>>3069604
Wonderful. I'm the pro now.
>>3069597
VSCO plus fujicuck camera