Stupid questions that don't deserve their own thread
Because knowing is half the battle
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
So there are these cameras (no particular order):
- Canon 80D
- Fuji X-T20
- Pentax K3 II
- Nikon D610 or used D750 (below 50k actuations)
- Sony a6300
And I'd like to buy one from the list, with 35mm FoV lens. I'd like to earn with it small ammounts of cash (low-level events, stock, prints), do some travels. Size and video capabilities are much less important than image quality. Which would you take?
I have a Canon 7D with a 28-80. Is this fine for street photography?
Also is it called street photography if you don't really want people in your shots?
I shot this inside a mall not using a low enough Fstop and now it is noisy as hell. Can anyone try to fix it? i tried using the blur tool on the yonug girls face but the noise is uniform throughout the photo
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:08:12 02:04:08 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1926 Image Height 1926
>>3144756
the full file is here
www.chosis.com/image.jpg (JPG)
www.chosis.com/RAW.ARW
both are around 20 MB
free free to crop and change it to try to make it look less noisy
we do not support pedos here sorry
>>3144791
i p-p-p-promise i'm not a p-p-p-edo just bc i take pictures of children
Anyone got experience with the bmpcc?
Shit battery life
Overheats
Bad at low light
just sold mine after 3 years. it's a fun little camera but there's a lot better things now at the same price point
>>3144076
>bad at low light
considering is has bigger pixels than the A7 (42mm2 per megapixel compared to 36mm2 per megapixel), I don't think you know what you're talking about
>repackaged fuji stock
>could go and buy some cheap fuji instead of supporting Melbourne nu-males
>hipsters love it
Disgusting
>>3143901
>sunny 16
>iso 400
>implying any cameras can shoot at 1/400
>implying hipsters even know how to expose without a meter
>>3143901
How's the price compare to Fuji? I know AUS prices are typically insane.
>>3143911
what kind of shit camera cant shoot 1/400?
ignore the differences in the trails, which colours would you prefer?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 7370 Image Height 4916 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:09:03 07:07:18 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 712 Image Height 950
>>3143875
Upper, looks more natural.
>>3143875
upper
>>3143875
Blue
Let's save everyone's time from googling and dwelling in forums, post some influential legends (that really inspire you) and their works that really fascinate you. And of course, /discuss/.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1800 Image Height 1125 Scene Capture Type Standard
The power couple of modern photography.
>>3143795
I really like Yousuf Karsh. Maybe because i like traditional composition, i'm not really into experimental/modern composition that tries to be a e s t h e t i c.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 821 Image Height 1000 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3143798
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 780 Image Height 1000 Scene Capture Type Standard
Any other phaggots at the Ayr airshow just now?
No, been about a year for me.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 60D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.12 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.0 Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 120 dpi Vertical Resolution 120 dpi Image Created 2017:09:02 11:23:51 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 180.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>3143529
you had a nice day for it anon
>>3143638
only had the 200mm with me, will post any if they are decent.
>No 20mp sensor
>small m4/3 sensor
>screen not fully articulated for lol selfies and video but added 4k? lol wut
>same shit as before but this time $800++
I've had it with Olympus. They are like the Nikon Df of the camera world. Only bringing shit for looks with no use in the real world.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7500 Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/6.3 ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 80.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto
sage for autism
wow cool info but not really I actually don't care haha lol.
>>3143413
Go back to your full frame DSLR then, autist. Go shoot something that will end up in your instagram, with a $6000 full frame DSLR camera.
>"real camera for real photography!"
What a bullshit thing. You're here, very occupied with hating M4/3 but you're not saying anything about point and shoot photography?
would be great for talking and sharing easily
Wow that's a great picture how do u do that?
>>3143305
What app/filter did you use to make the lights look like that?
>>3143313
He used the rangefinder app. It makes sure non of your photos are in focus. Even at f32.
So, now that the film vs digital is pretty much settled, as film has been proven superior to digital everytime, can we envision a third medium for creating photography?
We had a chemical medium, then a digital conversion from light via quantizing, which delivers awful results, and it seems the "scientists" behind all this wont ever experiment with a third medium. I say we should get a chemical to digital medium that changes shape everytime and resets electronically, bassically a reusable chemical sensor that can output digital data.
also
>film = beautiful white girl
>digital = t h o t
>>3143126
The person taking these photos was clearly trying to make digital look bad. Just look at the background
Literally
one minute
of editing
Why doesn't Olympus just go full frame?
>>3143115
no ff lenses
would need to design new mount
basically need to design a whole new system from scratch
Because you don't convince people to buy your stuff by bringing more of the same of what your competitors do.
If you want to sell, you have to offer something different.
Olympus' motto is fast & compact.
>>3143118
seems to me like they can either do that now or get totally left behind within 2 or 3 years.
We're getting toward medium format sized sensors in DSLRs now - they need to catch the fuck up and fast.
>The only polaroid that can actually focus
>Starts at $350
Why is the funnest form of photography so expensive.
>>3142896
ill sell you mine for 200
Mine can focus and it's not this polaroid.
Buying one isn't the problem. The film itself is expensive as fuck. $35 for 8 shots.
>be on instagram
>liking random photos on different hashtags trying to get followers
>one of my mom's co-workers says that I have been liking her photos, acting like I am a weirdo
>she shows me a picture of her co-worker
>never seen her in my life
>check all of the photos I have liked for the last 3 months
>don't see a single photo of her
>everyone acting like I am weirdo for liking random photos try to get followers
What the fuck? Isn't it normal to randomly like photos on instagram trying to get followers back?
Not only did I never like one of this lady's photos, my mom is acting like I am insane for liking random photos
>>3142694
I run a bot of my instagram at home, I like over 1000 photos a day and follow hundreds. I Don't give a shit, and you shouldn't either
>>3142699
Can you get your instagram account deleted because of running a bot?
aww does littel babby anon want milkies from mommy's special friend?
Is that why you keep liking the pictures of her boobies anon?
This is why medium format is crippled until we begin printing on circles instead of squares.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 180 dpi Vertical Resolution 180 dpi Image Created 2012:09:29 18:09:21 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 975 Image Height 401
your post makes absolutely no sense.
>>3142664
Maybe to a tiny dick micro four third Vick like you. It makes sense to people who aren't fucking pleb cunts.
>>3142662
Like, you understand that medium format lenses cover a larger image circle, right?
How is this possible? iso 6400, shutterspeed 1/3000 and this image is still so bright?
I know that when im shooting at iso 6400 I have to use slow shutterspeed (1/30 - 1/80). I'm aware that it does not say what f/-stop he is using but even if he used f/1.4 or below.. it still doesnt make any sense to me how this image can be so well-exposured.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
>>3142623
because 6400 is a pretty high iso. i just tried those same settings with my d5100 and 18-55 kit lens wide open in a room with 2 energy saving bulbs and some natural light and the picture wasn't even really that underexposed. it's probably a lens that goes to 1.8 or 1.4 and any kind of decently bright light.
i think the real question though, is why use 1/3000 when you're shooting a static object
>>3142623
ISO 6400 is high ISO. Maybe you're confused because your camera's auto ISO only picks that high when it's really dark out? I'm guessing he's shooting in daylight.
>>3142636
Up in the corner of the Op image, it says "Full Review: Leica M10". So probably shooting at that shutter speed specifically to show how the pictures look at ISO 6400.
>>3142623
>I know that when im shooting at iso 6400 I have to use slow shutterspeed (1/30 - 1/80)
What are you talking about?
-ISO determines the sensor's sensitivity. A higher number means more sensitivity.
-Shutter speed controls the duration of exposure, which affects exposure. (Longer exposure means more light, shorter exposure means less light.)
-Aperture controls the size of the opening in the lens that lets light through. (Smaller number means bigger hole, more light comes through. Bigger number means smaller hole meaning less light comes through.)
Go to your library and read a book about photography basics. Sounds like you've been misinformed by an idiot friend or an idiot blogger.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand