File: 1496133196466.jpg (114KB, 294x370px) Image search:
[Google]
114KB, 294x370px
How does lightning affect photos?
6 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Lighting is the photo
You wouldn't have a photo without lighting
>>
>>3090743
This. In order to even see anything light has to bounce off of something in the first place, and proper lighting is essential because of absorption, that is, when light bounces it loses some of its wavelengths, which is one of the reasons fluorescent and sodium street lights looks like hot shit, they an extremely narrow light bandwidth that doesn't bounce well off anything.
>>
I imagine lightning would destroy photos, much like it does trees, livestock, and the homes of those who did not sacrifice to Odin
File: tempImageForSave.jpg (457KB, 1813x1813px) Image search:
[Google]
457KB, 1813x1813px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1813 Image Height 1813
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
this picture can go one way to the trash
>>
2/10 would delete off card before getting home
>>
>>3090583
suburbia.
am i supposed to see anything specialin this image?
where is the subject?
why?
try to think about if or what you want to say with a photo
File: IMGP1215.jpg (214KB, 1000x662px) Image search:
[Google]
214KB, 1000x662px
Any Sydƒags get out to Vivid yet? It's fucking stellar. My photos suck because I suck, but would love for some anons to share theirs.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-50 Camera Software ArcSoft PhotoStudio Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 36 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:06:07 02:53:41 Exposure Time 20 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 24.38 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 1355 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Distant View
7 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMGP1243 - Version 2.jpg (171KB, 1000x662px) Image search:
[Google]
171KB, 1000x662px
:3
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-50 Camera Software ArcSoft PhotoStudio Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:06:07 02:56:49 Exposure Time 5 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 1355 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Distant View
>>
File: IMGP1211.jpg (198KB, 1000x662px) Image search:
[Google]
198KB, 1000x662px
last one
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-50 Camera Software ArcSoft PhotoStudio Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 64 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:06:07 02:53:45 Exposure Time 1 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 42.50 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 1355 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Distant View
>>
File: IMGP1256.jpg (153KB, 1000x662px) Image search:
[Google]
153KB, 1000x662px
bumping with s'more.
if you guys haven't seen Urban Tree 2.0 at Martin Place you're missing out! It's just about the most charming thing I've ever seen.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make PENTAX Camera Model PENTAX K-50 Camera Software ArcSoft PhotoStudio Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:06:07 15:42:05 Exposure Time 1 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Exposure Bias -0.7 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2048 Image Height 1355 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Distant View
File: fullsize.jpg (19KB, 500x400px) Image search:
[Google]
19KB, 500x400px
I've never really liked smartphones, I like having stuff separate. I'm looking for a decent point-and-shoot camera, not too advanced, but it can't be all too simple either. Just something available for around $200 or so that takes decent images. I'm not a professional photographer, nor do I aspire to be one.
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
go find the gear thread
>>
>>3090323
$200 doesn't get you much if you're not going used. Just pick something from here
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?ci=9811&N=4288586282&mnp=&mxp=200
>>3090325
At this point there are more meme Sony posts than actual Sony posts.
>>
>>3090331
>going used
That's what I was planning.
File: 1496519404243.jpg (23KB, 480x406px) Image search:
[Google]
23KB, 480x406px
Hey guys, I am looking to buy a decent camera with zoom (at least 20x) and 15mp or above.
To get to the point: I don't know shit about modern cameras, I want something with good flash, digital and what not, maybe that can withstand a drop that cost 200$ or less
Can someone help orient me to as to what the fuck model I am looking for?
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>decent camera
>20x zoom
choose one
>>
>>3090290
>200$ or less
>zoom (at least 20x)
sounds like you want a shitty bridge camera, even though you shouldn't
>>
>>3090290
Use your phone.
File: IMG_0198.jpg (25KB, 470x313px) Image search:
[Google]
25KB, 470x313px
What are some legit ways to make money shooting video?
Besides weddings I mean
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 470 Image Height 313 Scene Capture Type Standard
6 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3090224
Freelance marketing
Many smaller companies want nice videos to put on their social media sites. But you'll have to work closely with them and search for that work.
Drone footage
Many of the HUGE YT channels, like the ones that have stores and sell shit etc, have a dedicated cameraman/editor.
If you want constant cash, find someone with amazing talent and offer to mooch off of them
>>
>>3090227
This is pretty accurate.
Smaller business (think doctors, car dealers, etc) often outsource social marketing. You can build a little book of business that way, or linkn up with the local agencies
>>
>>3090224
Hell bro, you FIRE - you can make money with anything you want to do.
File: Penguins.jpg (760KB, 1024x768px) Image search:
[Google]
760KB, 1024x768px
My fitness club is looking to get a new camera for shooting stage photos but none of us really have a clue on what to get.
Budget is max $1000.
So we need a camera and a lens. Main purpose is to shoot stage photos. So where the camera will be its gonna be dark, and bright ish light on stage, need a good lens for that I guess, and the competitors are standing still when posing, so cant imagine we need something super advanced?
Thanks a bunch in advance
regards, /fit/b/ro
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Photographer Corbis Image-Specific Properties: Image Created 2009:03:12 13:48:35
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
Lens depends on how far the camera will be from stage, probably light telephoto with image stabilizing. Also you might want to consider a tripod.
>>
Distance will probably be around 20 or so meters. And we have a tripod
>>
>>3090108
Get a Sony A7RII and Gmaster 70-200mm 2.8, 100mm f2, and 85mm 1.4. If you're going to make an investment, buy the best there is.
File: fob_fea-vivianmaier-magnum.jpg (70KB, 600x604px) Image search:
[Google]
70KB, 600x604px
Now that the dust has settled, what does /p/ think of Vivian Maier?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_Ne0ICiPi8
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 1 dp Vertical Resolution 1 dp
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
I think it's a good example of shooting what you find interesting; what is popular or trendy be damned.
>>
proto-isi from the looks of it, right down to the acerbic personality
>>
Was she talented?
Is she a literal meme?
Assuming the contact sheets shown are legit and not heavily doctored, she never second guessed a shot, they were all one shots, thats a very respectable trait on a photog (Eggleston was like this too).
File: IMG_20170606_045225.jpg (637KB, 1728x2880px) Image search:
[Google]
637KB, 1728x2880px
I made a random pic on my tablet an hour ago and I don't know if this pic is either really shit or very picturesque
Hel/p/ me out
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make LENOVO Camera Model Lenovo TAB 2 A8-50 Camera Software MediaTek Camera Application_ Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:06:06 04:52:25 Exposure Time 131/500000 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Not Defined ISO Speed Rating 82 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Other Flash No Flash Focal Length 3.50 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1728 Image Height 2880 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
7 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3090033
Not a great photo. There's hardly any detail in the dark areas, and the colors are all wrong. I realize why you like it, but I imagine it looked much better in person.
>>
>>3090033
Fairly generic and unexciting. What we call a snapshit. Keep it up though.
>>
Shituresque
File: Screenshot_20170606-085041~01.png (877KB, 1080x1075px) Image search:
[Google]
877KB, 1080x1075px
>Go Micro Four Thirds they said
>It will be smaller and lighter they said
What did they mean by this?
61 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3089883
>What did they mean by this?
Micro Four Thirds is well built, weather sealed and not a toy
>>
>>3089883
A pro-level camera is heavier than a prosumer camera.
>>
>>3089885
>Micro four thirds is well built
you mean the camera is
they could have put a FF or at the least an apsc sensor into that
File: IMG_20170605_204204200.jpg (691KB, 4160x2340px) Image search:
[Google]
691KB, 4160x2340px
I was wandering if anyone could show me what one of these shutters looks like, I'm trying to recreate this in 3D but the shutter is giving me a little issue. the camera is a DSC-HX20V. I gave it a go to what I thought it might look like and where the pivot point may be, but this is wrong. thanks in advance
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Motorola Camera Model Moto G (4) Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:06:05 20:45:57 Exposure Time 1/14 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 1250 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness Unknown Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Average Flash No Flash, Auto Focal Length 3.64 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4160 Image Height 2340 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Soft Geodetic Survey Data WGS-84
9 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3089803
... that's a lens cover
>>
>>3089814
sorry, I am not familiar with the terminology. what is the difference?
>>
File: IMG_0015.jpg (126KB, 750x747px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 750x747px
opinions ?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 750 Image Height 747
9 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
its aight
>>
is this some kind of artsy photo that i dont understand or the cover for a cover for a soundcloud mixtape. what are you portraying here
>>
>>3089784
some confused individual flipping me off? I have no idea what the idea behind this is, but it's executed terribly
File: wedding.jpg (219KB, 1086x876px) Image search:
[Google]
219KB, 1086x876px
rate my first wedding shooting
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 20D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows Photographer David Ball Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2007:08:08 00:58:56 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 70.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1086 Image Height 876 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
10 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 324d3912-9491-495e-b496-fdf50cd3912c.jpg (80KB, 540x540px) Image search:
[Google]
80KB, 540x540px
>>3089630
Look its 90s agaaaaaaain!
>>
>>3089630
It's alright
Better than Jason laniers work
Not a fat of the exposure/dark corners
But all that matters is if the couple and their family are happy with the results
>>
>>3089630
At least once a month or so we get something like this on /p/. I honestly can never tell if it's serious or not.
File: 18920183_1478102318921176_6135981339681633829_n.jpg (71KB, 720x960px) Image search:
[Google]
71KB, 720x960px
Hello /p/, I come to you in time of great need.
Actually I am simply wondering if any of you have experience in photographing pieces of art for the sake of advertising and selling them.
Ive been using the Nikon Coolpix L110 (https://www.cnet.com/products/nikon-coolpix-l110/review/) but the pictures don't always come out nice and crisp and it doesn't look professional enough. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. I joined a pic as an example.
Is it a matter of Mp? I don't think so because 10-12 Mp should be more than enough for small pictures right?
I was looking into this Olympus model perhaps: Olympus PEN E-PM2 16.1 MP (http://www.ebay.com/itm/Olympus-PEN-E-PM2-16-1-MP-Digital-Camera-White-Kit-w-M-Zuiko-Digital-II-14-4-/262962776461)
Anybody has experience with that model or with art pictures in general? How could I make my pics more neat and crisp?
Thank you
8 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3089519
Are you shooting on manual
>>
>>3090025
Regardless, OP. Shoot on the lowest ISO. Back that shit up and make sure your horizontals are actually level. Also make sure it is in focus. If it isn't "neat and crisp" you missed focus and/or your ISO is too high.
>>
Lighting is your problem, but buying lights can be complicated and a little pricey considering the camera you're using. The easiest way to get good lighting for free is by placing it near a window. It'll cast a large soft light over your work and make it look much better. Everything beyond that is just exposure triangle stuff. A new camera will let you take photos with less light, but it cant fix poor quality light.
File: Screen Shot 2017-06-05 at 1.00.56 pm.png (1MB, 1103x736px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1103x736px
Did I overdo it with the high pass filter?
>dat white halo
It has white around it in the unedited RAW too, it could actually be part of the kite.
10 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3089450
It's the kite that kind of ruins it, but if you can fix the halo on it you'll be fine.
>>
it's possible
worst case scenario it can be edited out
good picture though, nice composition and pleasing contrast
>>
>>3089450
Yes. If you have to ask, you know you've gone way the fuck overboard.