Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 10. page

Learn to use the spot removal tool and in lightroom

>>3144414
It really sucks compared to what you can do in PS.. doesn't cut it sometimes

>>3144412
Are you exporting in a different colorspace maybe?

File: 91dcda4f01804c7a0559cec81e61c014--antique-cameras-old-cameras.jpg (203KB, 736x582px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 736x582px

That looks like a graflex monorail. Seems there should be some kind of tilt/pan head under that bracket

I have the exact same camera. That is a 1941-1949 Graflex Graphic View I they were made during wartime too. It has full movements, tilt, swing, pan, rise and fall you name it the camera can do it.

If you get it do a torque test on all of the screws. It's a decent camera and the format is 4x5" but many of the Speed Graphic lenses made by Kodak will work on it if you mount them in a suitable mount plate which I believe is 3 1/2" x 3 1/2" but I could be wrong on that part.

Check the bellows for light leaks and also get the optional ground glass cover but try to find the version with the built-in kickstand mine doesn't have it and it's a pain in the ass but it does protect the GG which is nice.

As for the tripod mount, mine does not have it but they can be found on eBay and the block it attaches to is standard thread size so you can attach any tripod mount plate to it, but it will sit lower on the tripod and depending on what lens you are using you may have trouble with movements or focus, I have a Schneider 180 that covers 5x7 and a Kodak 127 that barely covers 4x5 and I haven't had any issues. In 99% of shooting situations you'll be okay.

>>3144345
in theory yeah, theres usually a thread on the little gray bit. Might not be standard size that you'd find on most tripods today. Also you'll have to spin it a bunch or just get a block.

if you do buy it I recommend getting better glass, those old graflex lenses are alright but theres much better stuff out there.

File: 000008-2.jpg (958KB, 830x1200px) Image search: [Google]

958KB, 830x1200px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SLP1000SE
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:03 23:12:38
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 000013-2.jpg (1MB, 1200x830px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x830px

>>3144307

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SLP1000SE
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:03 23:12:39
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 000021-2.jpg (1MB, 1200x830px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x830px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SLP1000SE
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:09:03 23:12:40
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 20170809adf8604025_215.jpg (2MB, 3684x2303px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3684x2303px

>>3144297

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3S
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Photographer	SIG Robert Whitmore
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	998
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	300 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:09 18:11:25
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	500
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3684
Image Height	2303
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 20170809adf8604025_169.jpg (3MB, 4256x2660px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4256x2660px

>>3144298

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3S
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Photographer	SIG Robert Whitmore
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	998
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	300 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:08:09 18:12:13
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	2500
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	300.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4256
Image Height	2660
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 20170729adf8604025_009.jpg (2MB, 4256x2832px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4256x2832px

>>3144299

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3S
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Photographer	SIG Robert Whitmore
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	926
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	400 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4256
Image Height	2832
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:29 21:34:20
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	400.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4256
Image Height	2832
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

Bump :)

i was the biggest preset whore that you can ever imagine.
but after downloading fucking billions of presets wasting my time on pirating rather editing by myself, learning new things, experimenting with photography/editing or taking photos in general. i wasted a lot of money too.
what i've learned nothing, fucking NOTHING
if really want presets then start with vsco film or LXC(if you shot weddng or want to be extra hipster) those presets are good, and remember EVERY single one of the new wave hipster preset is based of of vsco presets.

and if you want this preset, she made that preset fom the vsco's prest 400h pack 6.
here channel link
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyvBlO4JBrB72FatCxmWFew
check her older videos how she did same editing with 400h rather than spending money on stupid modified vsco preset.

one thing more, the editing results also depend upon the exposure, composition and light of the photo. photographer have their own unique photography style and they also develop editing style with it.

I hope it'll help you, anon

>>3144427
>all preshits is based on VSCO
this


To me, presets are two things;

A quick way to preview looks.
An easy way to fast edit multiple images from a single set.

I have my own presets for that.
It gives me a general idea of what the photo/set is going to look like.

I'd been using PS for photography for more than 10 years before using LR so I knew how all the tools worked and what I needed to do.

But for a beginner, presets may be useful in determining how people actually edit.

File: 20582624_1997948890439157_4776926621623910400_n.jpg (59KB, 960x686px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 960x686px

Also how many of you have worked together with your gfs, be it shooting, modeling or something else?

>>3144128
I work with my gf all the time

>>3144128
i work my gfs pussy all the time.

Your phone

>>3143952
> under 100 dollars
No. Get an used bicycle or something to get wherever you can shoot with your phone.

And then just save up until for a $1.5-2k or whatever midrange camera (or a $5k+ professional setup, if that's the quality you're aiming for; that's the gear that gets it more reliably).

>>3144035
>And then just save up until for a $1.5-2k or whatever midrange camera (or a $5k+ professional setup, if that's the quality you're aiming for
no need to save up that much unless you're gonna buy new, lots of decent entry level dslr's on the used market for a couple hundred dollars

>>3143881
yes and no

>>3143883
care to elaborate

>>3143883
dont just say the quality of the glass or the aperture and shutterspeed balance

>>3143841
taking out the sd card to transfer is both safer and faster.

>>3143841
you never unplug your shit during a transfer. that's your own stupid fault. its not the camcorder, it's your stupid ass thinking things work a certain way when they don't. next you're gonna say you've done it tons of times before and then i'll tell you that all the times you've done it you haven't unplugged your media halfway into a transfer. chances are if it froze, its either:
A) the cable you used to plug your camcorder to the computer
B) it was not tightly secured on either end
C) the hardware on either device was damaged due to any number of reasons which caused a jerk in the connectivity which threw the file transfer into that frozen state. if you wanna do video don't listen to all the fags that are gonna recommend sony alpha whatever the fuck stills cameras that have 4k eat my ass resolution. no one gives a fuck about that. get yourself a panasonic hc-w580. look up reviews or whatever. for the price, it is amazing and you won't be disappointed. it has an SD card slot so you won't have to use a cable for file transfer and eliminate another disaster from happening.

>>3143843

Yes, well I've learned that the hard way. I'll never, ever use internal memory on a device again.

File: rsz_church.jpg (1MB, 1418x948px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1418x948px

>>3143604

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	FDi V4.5 / FRONTIER355/375-1.8-0E-016
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:28 12:50:15
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3637
Image Height	2433

File: rsz_shiny.jpg (392KB, 1140x1771px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1140x1771px

>>3143605

File: rsz_structure.jpg (956KB, 1370x915px) Image search: [Google]

956KB, 1370x915px

>>3143606

I like him
He said once that he try's to take one photo of a particular scene, might not be smart but I like it

>>3143458
>might not be smart
its not dumb either. only time a photog needs to spray a scene is when hes getting paid so he needs to make sure hes "getting the shot". eggleston aint outside trying to get the shot, hes just snapping cool stuff he finds.

literally the best togger of the 20th cntury

K, thx for letting me know

i shoot a nishika and 3d pop is real.

>>3143424
"film is better"

>>3143144
Cool, why don't you go photograph some of this magic instead of taking snapshits of rocks on your phone. Also resize. A piece of crap is bad, a piece of crap thats 4,000 pixels long is inexcusable.

>>3145328
>going on a light-writing imageboard and getting this upset

>>3145328
it's a more interesting post than yours though.

Because they are cheap brands who make cheap cameras for cheap people.

Just because they do quite well in video doesnt mean they have to abandon making cameras for old people/dole scum

>>3143121
why is this board so obsessed with m4/3 that there is a dozen threads bashing it? also, Olympus video sucks, no one uses them for that and the company focus is on stills

>>3143163
Why are you so obsessed with what other people think? You aren't insecure about your micropenis camera sensor, are you?

>>3142972
go with fuji

>>3142972
Buy a 35mm f2 IS for steady handheld shots.
Buy a a7II for the same results with whatever lens you put on it.
a7s is for video.

File: low light.jpg (94KB, 652x548px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 652x548px

>>3142972
A7S is fantastic for low light shooting. 12MP is more than enough if you don't plan to do large prints.

>>3143055
>>3143048
retards