ITT we post things we never wish to see while /out/
I run screaming every time I see one of these vile creatures
You're joking right? Because there's just no way race-mixing on a massive scale is going to do that.
Morph pics work like that because they average out features. So all the uniquely ugly parts of faces are evened out and don't show up in the mix.
I would foresee a race-mixed America as looking like an uglier Brazil.
Why uglier? Fast food infrastructure. You'll have more malnutrition because people will be less intelligent and soft food causes shitty jaw development and teeth.
The race-mixed people will not be able to afford the same level of orthodontics so you'll all have sub-british teeth.
Another factor is the drugs pipeline established to the USA. For a time you'll still be getting lots of drugs and still able to afford them. The mixed people will possibly be indulging more than Brazilians can.
You'll all look like the people Tommy Sotomayor makes fun of in his videos.
If you look at the most heavily traveled areas of the world, like along the silk road, you will find the most beautiful people. They come from generations of mixing. Of course that is only for that section of the world. The pic of the women in >>662573 looks like any average chic in modern society really. With a cake layer of makeup as per norm.
>You boys have your permits and bear cans?
> the only good reason yet to carry bear spray and not a big fuck all gun
Do you guise mind when I drop cigarette butts on the trail?
Worldeaters. I work with dozens of them on a daily basis, and it seems like I can't get away from them whenever I go to the remaining prairies near my hometown out west.
Clearly you do not spend enough time lurking here.
What you you call your winter underwear?
Have you done any geopooping yet?
Have you gone full MGTOW?
Have you even so much as kicked a cairn?
I'm glad you posted this, it's a running joke with pretty much everyone I've been in a car on a country road at night with. I call that thing insect man and I even have music to summon insect man. Not even seen the film desu.
"oh, he just want's to play. "
>continues to bark like a moron
>doesn't listen to his owner ONCE
>starts sniffing your crotch
>smears his snot on your pants
>keeps running at you
>stands up on you and
no thanks. if you don't have your dog under controle, don't have one
Now, they say that they're more scared of you than you are of them.
So what? I'd rather see a million orange peels laying about than one city. I love hypocrites who fancy themselves environmentalists. You don't give a fuck about the ecosystem, you only want things to be neat like your living room.
I'm not even fucking kidding you guys, my fear of aliens is worse than any kind of human. It's fucking ridiculous.
I realised though, if I was to be abducted I would probably have my memory erased like men in black.
Watch this before you go out next time.
I could never make it through that scene when I was a kid. I was really into aliens but that scene was a bit too far.
I still occasionally spoop myself when I have the place to myself at night and I watch a bunch of alien stuff on YouTube. I know how dumb it is. Its just a hold over fear from childhood.
Not littering has nothing to do with being an environmentalist, it's about not being a dick
It doesn't say what type of firearm they were carrying. For instance, a BFR in 45-70 will have slightly different effect than a 9mm or a .380. Since it doesn't mention what the people were carrying or break them down into categories of caliber and experience I would say bear mace is better for the average user who doesn't understand .380 won't penetrate a bear as well as tin cans. However, the best medicine for bear defense is and always will be hard cast lead.
So how many people here have been abducted and probed while innawoods?
I've been probed. I been probed bigtime bro.
>city living isn't most environmentally friendly way to live
Maybe communal living. Large cities are definitely not the most efficient way for humans to live. When food and other resources need to be brought in from far away places to keep the city dwellers living, then it is not very environmentally friendly. It is, however, the best way to create the high tech industry jobs that allow for all of our "advances".
The most environmentally sound way for humans to live would be in small communities where the population size is determined by the amount of food capable of being produced in the surrounding areas.
What I dislike more is when I take my dog out and other people have their dogs running around. I keep my dog close and usually only take him off his leash if I know there's no one around. If I hear or see anyone I'll call him over and leash him up. I usually don't stop to chat with random strangers when I'm out, but if they want to pet him I'll usually say yes. Otherwise I just move on.
The problem is most other people just let common courtesy go out the window when they step onto a trail. Their dogs go off the leash and just run all up and down the trail. You'll be walking and then all of a sudden you've got a full grown german shepherd running towards you nuts. I don't mind that much, it's a little annoying and dogs usually follow me around so then I have to walk it back to it's owner, but if I have my dog with me, he gets on edge. He's not a very big dog, and I can't really blame him for growling or barking at other dogs when they do that. It's like any other wild animal charging you in the woods, your dog is going to want to protect itself and you. But of course I'm the asshole because my dog is growling at your dog.
I was going to camp to "ovejas" and had houses on the road and saw that doll and supposedly abandoned house ... obviously this is false, but then if it was hard.
I just inject them into the earth with a stick. Never to be seen again.
How is it not the the most efficient way? Welcome to reality where we already have 7.5 billion people. If they all went to live in "small communities," it would wreck the environment worse than the current method. The resources needed to bring food and goods is offset by the efficiency of scaling up production.
The benefit of the method you've proposed is mainly that it limits human population, but that's not the world we live in. Given equal population sizes, I still think dense urban living is more efficient until you get down to extremely low populations where our environmental impact is going to be almost negligible.
The fuck is with you guys? The bear population already shit the fucking bed once, it doesn't need shitheads to come along and fuck it up because "hard cast lead is the best medicine for bear defense." Here's an idea, don't fucking kill the bear and save yourself at the same time. You act as if the bear is out to fuckin get you or some shit.
>mfw i asspained someone so much they saved a pic of me
don't worry, you probably won't see us. we tend to head places no one else goes
from Article 4 Free Inhabitants like this one
Silk road is large and it's populations are not >lel mixed. They have very specific histories orr have been there for so long not even them know where they came from ike the pashtuns. But yeah that area has some weird shit, only one step bellow brazil.