[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
Undisputed worst car companies
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /o/ - Auto

Thread replies: 113
Thread images: 24
File: ford-logo.png (292 KB, 2000x800) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
ford-logo.png
292 KB, 2000x800
I'll start.
>>
File: 1452222019734.jpg (32 KB, 480x360) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1452222019734.jpg
32 KB, 480x360
/thread
>>
>I don't like Ford.
>I cry everyday because I don't like Ford.
>Someone mentioned Ford in another thread.
>I better make my own thread, that'll show em.
>>
>>14267208
GM and Chrysler are worse
Ferd>GM>Chrysler

Then again, I don't ever want to have a GM or any other American car.
>>
>>14267208
Mazda

What do I win?
>>
GM.
Chrysler.
>>
>>14267243
Spot the toyota shill.
>>
>>14267208
GM on the whole is terrible.

>>14248444

Link related, this happened on the weekend.
>>
>>14267267
I bet you bought a RX-8, didn't know how to take care of it, and trashed the engine within a couple months.
>>
>>
File: 1378863827431.jpg (51 KB, 600x338) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1378863827431.jpg
51 KB, 600x338
>>14267267
>owned a '06 mazda 6
>ford/mazda collab
>mfw trying to fix literally anything
>>
Lada
>>
>>14267327
>Victim blaming

Mazdas are shit get over it he didn't go out of his way expressly to buy a horrid unreliable little car
>>
File: 9_lives_bait_works.png (73 KB, 1333x600) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
9_lives_bait_works.png
73 KB, 1333x600
>>
>>14267371
Make inexpensive, reliable, fun to drive cars.
>shit
>>
>>14267409
Exactly, the Miata is a great, inexpensive, reliable sports car, and the RX-8 and RX-7 can be fun, unique, reliable cars if their owner isn't a retard.
>>
>>14267409
>inexpensive
yes
>reliable
yeah no
>fun
yeah fuck no, prob you only owned mazda in your lifetime
>>
File: _20150927_110658.jpg (252 KB, 841x1002) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
_20150927_110658.jpg
252 KB, 841x1002
>>14267464
>>
Scion. Fedoras on wheels for Millennials who don't know the difference between drivetrains while wanting to look sporty.
>>
>>14267208
This
>ecoboost
Is really just Mazda tech
>military grade
Isn't a real thing
>Ford commercials
Just a popular song with a car doing nothing

It's pathetic. Everything ford has is the product of another companies hard work.
>>
File: imgres.png (4 KB, 234x216) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
imgres.png
4 KB, 234x216
>>14267208

I Win
>>
File: car_logo_PNG1655.png (402 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
car_logo_PNG1655.png
402 KB, 1024x768
lets go ahead and get this shit over with
>>
>>14267537
ford saved mazduh tho.
>>
ITT: People talk about manufacturers that they think are the worst only for someone to mention a manufacturer that they like and go in damage control mode.

>hurr the entire brand of "x" is shit
>not all cars from "x" are shit

>>14267305
>>14267267
>>14267327
>>14267358
>>14267371
>>14267409
>>14267431

Case in point.
>>
>>14267548
Then you have morons like this that have no idea how Mazda actually saved Ford.
>>
>>14267305
It's GM's fault his German-made, Australian-badged car explodenated?
>>
YUGO
>>
>>14267576
Meme magic did this. We said Jimmy is kill and now the universe seeks to make it so.
>>
>>14267358
is this a game? what game? google isn't giving me much
>>
I expected this to be the first post, what's wrong with you /o/?
>>
File: vw.jpg (81 KB, 620x411) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
vw.jpg
81 KB, 620x411
>>
>>14267537
>ecoboost is just mazda tech
This is how i know you know nothing.
>>
>>14268327
BRAIN DAMAGE!!!
>>
>>14267267
who /automaticallydisrespectwholikesMazda/ here?
>>
>>14267262
GM's full size trucks, SBC, and LS are master race. You're an idiot faking a mindset to look like a special snowflake.
>>
>>14268327
The 2.3L ecoboost is pretty much the L3-VDT. Ford obviously spent so, so much work on that engine.
>>
File: GM_logo-670.jpg (27 KB, 670x400) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
GM_logo-670.jpg
27 KB, 670x400
This or Chrysler.
>>
File: youseethekids.jpg (58 KB, 495x482) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
youseethekids.jpg
58 KB, 495x482
>>14267537
You see, the kids, they listen to the rap music, which gives them the brain damage
>>
>>14268507
prove him wrong then
>>
>>14268522
he didnt even prove his claims anyway. Ford saved mazda, and now mazda makes millenial cars like a true fag
>>
>>14268646
>Ford saved mazda
Thats why ford used mazda motors in a large amount of their vehicles.
Mazda saved ford.
As did every other company ford fucked over
>>
>>14268656
>implying Aston Martin saved Ford, not the other way around
>>
>>14268656
those engines are made by ford, and mazda used them
>>
>>14268668
>Aston martin gave their main design cue to ford
>ford sales skyrocket because retarded consumers think it looks like an aston
yeah.. no... aston martin totally took advantage of ford huh.....
>>
>>14268675
>people actually think this
>he's too stupid to use google
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
>>
>>14268656
>Implying that Jaguar saved Ford
That's adorable. Read up on Lucas electronics, British Leyland, and Smith instruments and understand why your statement is utterly retarded. Then look at the fact that Mazda was circling the drain when Ford made their move (It's almost like heavily investing in rotary engines was a bad idea.).
>>
My parents own a 2013 Durango and its crap and already has a lot of problems at 44k. My freind also has a 2015 Chrysler 200 s 2.4 rental becuase he totaled his car and the transmission is going out on it already
>>
>>14268405
Chrysler. Hands down. They went from being on par with Pierce Arrow, Peerless, Packard, et al to being worse than a Korean car from the fucking 80's.
>>
>>14268692
The Jaguar AJ126 and AJ133, while built in a Ford plant (plant within a plant), are not Ford or Ford derived.

The Evoque, well yes it is a 2.0 EcoBoost. (mazda derived)
>>
File: 1425855235283.jpg (1 MB, 2048x1901) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1425855235283.jpg
1 MB, 2048x1901
I'll just leave this here.
>>
>>14268692
From a BBC report
>But Jaguar in particular has never prospered under Ford's ownership and the world's third largest motor manufacturer last night told MPs that both it and Land Rover are to be sold.
I'm sure ford had something to gain from the purchase and sale. Just like they do from everyone they partner with
>>
>>14268712
Cool story, bro. That doesn't change the fact that both companies were in dire straits before they were acquired. Nor does that change the fact that without the intervention of Ford (particularly, their infrastructure and business acumen), Jaguar would have joined Wolseley, Austin, Morris, Triumph, et al on the long list of dead British car makers. As for Mazda? When Ford acquired their stake in 1979, they were fucked. They had banked heavily on rotary engines, which, as it turns out, were neither fuel efficient nor particularly reliable in what was a pretty serious energy crisis. Yes, Ford is a terrible company that builds crap, but you're deluding yourself if you think Mazda and Jaguar saved them. It doesn't work that way. Ford rebounded from the Edsel. They rebounded from the Pinto. Do you think that Mazda or Jaguar could have weathered that kind of shitstorm, ever?
>>
>>14268750
And you're still wrong, and no appeal to authority Not prospering isn't the same as "ceasing to exist entirely."
>>
>>14268716
Just gon slide dis right own in there wit ya
>>
>>14268754
Yes ford was doing so well that they had to use Mazda engines and chassis.
You're insane
Literally everything ford has today is from its partnerships with other companies.
>engines from mazda
>chassis from volvo
>styling from aston martin
etc etc
>>
>>14267547
>I can't afford one
Silly little fox.
>>
>>14268774
>BBC article is wrong
okee dokee retard
>>
>>14268774
NBC article
>Jaguar's decline tale of a tarnished brand
>But the Big Cat’s image has seriously eroded in recent years under the ownership of Ford, despite a revival in its flagging quality.
>>
>>14268822

To add
>In Tata’s first five full years of ownership (’09-’14), Jaguar has turned a profit every year. During Ford’s 18-year tenure, it never had a single year in the black.
>>
File: Ford_RS200.jpg (49 KB, 600x421) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Ford_RS200.jpg
49 KB, 600x421
what about this car op ?
>>
>>14268778
Not the people you are arguing with but.
>Pic is ecoboost engines

Most or all of these are derived from or are mazda engines correct?

also could you say the Ford GT 3.5-L ecoboost engine is also mazda or a heavily modified mazda engine?
>>
>>14268778
Dude, the damage control is getting pathetic. I get it, you're a member of generation Z, and being wrong triggers you, but you need to man up and accept that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. A partnership means that information and technology flows both ways. Seeing that aston-martins and Jags, became relatively reliable cars, I would say that they benefited, as did Mazda.
>>
>>14268797
Nope, your interpretation of it is wrong, retard. Take another adderall and see if you can't muster up a triple digit IQ, senpai. Once more: "Not prospering" is not the same as "going the fuck under." Jag and Aston benefited from the acquisition, they were able to stay alive and their build quality increased immensely.
>>
>>14268843
And, would tata have been able to shit with the brand if it disappeared entirely? Congratulations, you've shown that you can cherry pick. Poorly.
>>
>>14268864
Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
FORD FUCKED JAG OVER
its all very easy to google
facts from credible sources on ALL OF IT
read here
>>14268843
or here
>>14268822


This guy
>>14268879
They NEVER TURNED A PROFIT UNDER FORD. Wasnt untill tata picked them up did they start to do well
Same with VOLVO. Ford ruined them for years. Now they are owned by the chinese just to survive after the mess ford made of them

Holy shit do you people not know how to use google or read?
Are you in that much of denial?
>>
>>14267576
>>14267305
>designed by Italians
>built by Germans
>maintained by an Australian
a recipe for disaster
>>
File: ssangyong-logo.jpg (128 KB, 1800x1113) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
ssangyong-logo.jpg
128 KB, 1800x1113
>65 posts in and no Ssangyong
>>
So much shilling for Fixed Or Repaired Daily
>>
>>14269002
nice maymay friend :^)
>>
>>14267225
>I can't stand the sight of reliable cars that sell themselves a bloo bloo
>>
>>14268688
Yes people actually think this because its the truth
>>
>>14269002
isnt chevy....gmc?
>>
>>14269341
Lol. Prove it.
Oh wait you cant
>>
>>14268775
>19 MPH slower
>.6 slower to 60
>somehow shaved 9.38 seconds off in the corners

When did dodge learn to stop sucking?
>>
>>14267208
>command-f
>no nissan
Come on /o/, nissan is shit ever since renault bought them.
>>
>>14268894
Jaguar would not exist today if were not for Ford buying them. PROVE ME WRONG.
>>
>>14269511
Yeah tata wouldn't have bought them and made them profitable much sooner.
You don't know how business works do you?
>>
>>14269524
I know more about how it works than you do, boy.
>>
>>14269538
Lol k
>>
>>14269524
Ford spend 20 years pumping money into Jag then sold them just as they got their shit together.
TATA got lucky with the timing of the purchase.
>>
>>14268894
>FORD FUCKED JAG OVER
WRONG
>The explosive growth under Ford's stewardship hasn't been entirely smooth for Jaguar, which lost $500 million in 2002 while trying to get the aluminum process right. An all-new _F-type sports car, conceived during Reitzle's tenure, was canceled. And Jaguar failed to spot the European trend toward diesel-powered cars that was sweeping Europe, losing sales to rivals such as BMW and Mercedes-Benz as a result.
>But Jaguar has been completely transformed by Ford ownership
>In the end, the two companies have been right for each other. Ford had the foresight to let Jaguar be Jaguar, only a lot more so.
>http://www.autonews.com/article/20030602/SUB/306020844/how-ford-bought-fixed-jaguar
>>
File: lol_you_moron.png (194 KB, 321x350) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
lol_you_moron.png
194 KB, 321x350
>>14269552
LOL you're pathetic
>>
>>14269570
>he's right
>better call him names to save face.
>>
>>14269553
Truth. Ford lost money on the charity case Jaguar and needed the money at the time they sold them due to the bad economic climate at the time .
>>
>>14269576
>samefag better post and pretend to be somebody else because nobody else believes his shit.
>>
>>14269589
but muh bad guys and heroes
>>
>>14269609
>not believing credible media sources
Ford fags
>insert head in sand and scream loudly
>>
>>14269370
Le prove it, you didnt cite your source so why should I google it for you retard
>>
>>14269664
Is this nigga serious?
>>
>>14269619
>insert head in sand and scream loudly
That's what you're doing

>>14269554
>There can be no doubt that Dearborn saved Jaguar
>http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=8497f7f8-5e35-43b5-bfaf-a05e58bc3af6&p=1
>>
>>14269619
ford haters
>insist left is right, up is down
>insist saving Jaguar from ceasing to exist is ruining it
>>
Holden (GM) In Australia, by far the worst here.
>>
ffs this thread is full of shit
>implying ford needs volvo chassis
>implying getting idle mazda engineers to design engines is a bad thing
if i spent the amount of money ford did on mazda and pag i'd want something back too
ford did a damn sight better for it's partners than many other companies did or would do.
>>
>>14269729
>He has never heard of great wall
>>
>>14267539

Y U G O
U
G
O
>>
Volkshite haven't produced a decent car since 1983.
>>
Chrysler is the undisputed worse as far as american cars go

They are literally nigger cars, both in terms of design and reliability
>>
>>14268295
FUCK YOU CUNT!
>>
>>14267353
Peugeot lately have been doing well on their cars now. Check out their new models.
>>
This thread will go on until you fags post all car makes.
>>
File: worst of all time.jpg (17 KB, 500x500) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
worst of all time.jpg
17 KB, 500x500
All time worst car make coming through.
>>
>>14271907
H-hey take that back
>>
>>14268385
>thinking small blocks chevys or LS engines are actually good
It's like saying iPhone are good quality or technologically advanced just because they're popular or have an oversatured aftermarket
>>
>>14269002
>building trailer queens
>>
>>14267208
That's objectively the best car company
>>
File: bmwlogo.jpg (67 KB, 800x800) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
bmwlogo.jpg
67 KB, 800x800
>>
There isn't one. Nor is there a best company.

Every notable car company has made their share of good and shit cars.
>>
>>14268385
>truck
I'm not gay.
>>
>>14274199
/thread
>>
>>14274199
Beautiful said. We need more people like you.
>>
File: viper gtr fixed 1.jpg (75 KB, 749x778) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
viper gtr fixed 1.jpg
75 KB, 749x778
>>14268775
just for you bby
>>
>>14269351
Yes
>>
>>14267353
Peugeot is pretty nice nowadays. That 308 break is pretty nice.
Thread replies: 113
Thread images: 24
Thread DB ID: 454027



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.