Find a flaw. Protip: You can't

File: 1446258025132.jpg (22KB, 395x395px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 395x395px

>>14264861
>Ford
>shilling this hard
Pathetic

Cant turn?

>5.0
Not a Shelby with a 5.2

Like all muscle cars it's an obnoxious boy toy that's only good at being cheap and noisy and doing red light drags.

>>14264894
>ecoboost, not a v6
>v6, not a v8
>5.0, not a 5.2

>>14264892
They changed the new model to take turns, since it was being offered in Yurp for the first time.

>>14264912
ecoboost is better than the V6, everyone knows that.

>>14264936
>v6, not a ecoboost
>ecoboost, not a v8
>5.0, not a 5.2

fixed

File: blue_2011_mustang.jpg (403KB, 1280x850px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 1280x850px

>>14264861
It doesn't look nearly as good as the 11-14 models. Fuck this bullshit "make everything look exactly like the Fusion or Focus" styling. It still looks nice, but it doesn't look fantastic. Either go full retro or go full sportscar like the New Edge SN95, don't make some kind of blob that sits in the middle.

>>14265114
>retro
shoo shoo boomer.

File: white_sn95.jpg (459KB, 799x452px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 799x452px

>>14265122
>le boomers may may

I'm not a huge fan of the retro movement myself, but the 11-14 Mustangs made it work. So does the current Challenger. My main point is, pick one and stick with it, don't try to fuse the two.

>>14264861

It isnt a twin turbo v8

File: stang.jpg (208KB, 600x449px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 600x449px

it doesn't look like this

>>14265114
I think the 2015 Mustang looks much better than the previous gen. The previous gen is basically a boomermobile. The new one looks refined and aggressive.

>>14265177
The new one doesn't know what it wants to be. It isn't really "refined" in the slightest, it's stuck halfway between "muh murrican muscle" and sportscar. It also looks like it's slightly melted, like all new cars. It needs to pick one style.

File: 2016-01-16 12.55.33.jpg (3MB, 2736x2052px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2736x2052px

Hmm let's see needed lowered an inch, the cluch assist spring needed ripped out right away, shifting to second can be a little off clunky if you don't hit it just right. Wouldn't mind a hair more low end power and it was a little too quiet off the lot. Might as well rip out the back seats to reduce pig fat as I've already dropped out 30 lbs of exhaust.

Luckily all that can be easily modded.

It's too big

It needs to be smaller to get my attention

File: 20150516_103053.jpg (3MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x1836px

>>14265166
Doesnt need to

>>14265941
> > Australia

>>14264861
It's RWD.

>>14265428

Springy clutch and shitty 1-2 shift here too brethren

Gotten use to the clutch by now, and the 1-2 shift is rough when you're still getting use to the car. Tremecs are pretty stout though, I've heard the Ferd MT-82 will literally rattle itself apart under anymore power than above stock.

This is coming from 5ho who I think has already had to replace something internally within his trans

File: hello_yes_this_is_bait.jpg (3KB, 124x124px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 124x124px

>>14266013

>american

>>14266045
Benchracer detected.

>>14266054
ebik
>>14266056
I don't get how it's a flaw. RWD generally means you're gonna have a good time with it. Little bit of tire smoke when you want, hektik skidz when you want, if you fuck up on the track and the rear end starts to come around, you have a chance of powering out of it.

>>14266014
I've been looking in to some braces I've read can help, if I'm just rolling normally in traffic I actually pull the shifter into the neutral position instead of trying to pull straight down and it's usually really smooth. At 4 grand or better it slides in easy.

If it's got an extra assist spring I'd rip that bitch out.

it has the front end of a fusion

>fat
>slow
>same dogshit 5.0l that needs boost or serious work to make anywhere near the power of a n/a 350
>Sucks cock
>typical ford unreliability and over complicated crap

Why not make a factory ecoboost v8? Oh thats right because it would rape that shitty i4 and v6 and then cant have that can they? Fucking ford!

>>14266112
The Coyote makes 435 hp bone-stock, what are you on about?

File: car.jpg (66KB, 632x218px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 632x218px

>>14264861
the design would be more impressive if it wasnt just a wider Fusion.

File: totalshit.jpg (2MB, 2581x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2581x1936px

>>14266014
This shit, pulling this thing out made it so I could feel the bite point rather than just having to be smooth. Takes a little more effort to hold it down but it was a worthy trade off.

>>14264952
Yeah, now you got it.

File: image.jpg (232KB, 1300x901px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 1300x901px

>>14264861
It's no SS

>>14264861
CANT

File: 20130410_161032.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

11-14 Gen looks better in white than the new gen

File: IMG_2318.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>14264861
those wheels are ugly

File: quarter mile edit.png (3MB, 1208x2896px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1208x2896px

>>14266014
MGW shifter and a clutch/tob replacement, Mine makes quite a bit of noise, but it also has like 200 passes on it at the drag strip so it wouldnt surprise me if it shits itself, I would like to do a tr6060 swap but that is 2expense so if it cant be warrantied ill just get my mt82 built

>>14267394

>dat average 60 ft

if you worked on your launches you'd be probably get close to 12.1 my friend

My trans noise increased with my hurst but that's common. I've got a noise reduction kit but said fuck it. Most of the time when it will actually be making a noise is when I'm at WOT and can't hear it anyways

File: 12555914_1332411323451032_507331850_n.jpg (94KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 640x640px

>>14264861
does anybody own this car? a new mustang? i could really use a favor. i need you to measure how wide your front bumper is from driver to passenger side. like from right in front of the wheel at the edge of the wheel well.

thing is i want a front splitter and nobody makes them for my car, but i happened upon this image today and the shape of its front end bears a striking resemblance to the shape of my front end. if its a similar size ill just buy the mustang one and adapt it to fit.

i know its a long shot but itd be a big help.

File: 20160118_180122.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

>>14267507
Eh bout 68 anon.

File: 0418151843b.jpg (301KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1200x675px

>>14267595
holy shit you actually did it! thanks buddy, i really appreciate it.

im at 66", so i might actually be able to make it work.

this is very exciting.

>>14267768
No problem hope it works out, if not totally sell it to me for cheap.

>>14268463
hah, you got it dude.

Ford makes me sad

The ecoboost could have been a separate model with a different body and cheaper interior and ford could have made an actual cheap rwd sports car worth a shit

There is a stigma on non-v8 mustangs that is literally unshakable in the public mind, no matter how many benchraces between 80's SVO's and their respective GT variants take place. Ford could have done no new engineering, give it a corporate "angry aston martin" grin instead of the melted rmustang rendition we have now, go light on the corporate electronic crap in the name of value, and dig up an old nameplate for a cheap sport base car and suddenly sell tens of thousands.

>>14264861
No supercharger.

>>14265989
Lmaoooo

File: 1444087557762.jpg (29KB, 253x259px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 253x259px

>>14264909
Enjoy your fwd honda, mom

File: Where do ya think your going.jpg (685KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

685KB, 2048x1536px

>>14264861
V6 still exists, yes I'm defending 4cyl. ecoboost. WHAT ABOUT IT CUNT

Transmission: Made in China

>>14269535
Your electronics are made there, fuckwit