/o/ will prefer one of these interiors Can you guess which

File: 1421334028224.jpg (462KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 1280x960px

My tastes are a little more sophisticated, desu senpai.

>>14249416
Thats glorious, what is it?

I'd rather have the one on the right because it's not a fucking buick

>>14249402
While I hate floppy paddle shifts, and like manuals, the one on the left would be pretty damn practical.

Minimalistic dash/tacho and holographic GPS would be awesome, though if it was left on permanently it would be annoying.

The one with a manual tranny, a real e-break, real gauges, real buttons and no fucking touch screens?
Yes please

>The wheel on the right is circular, unlike left
>Left has no transmission, probably a CVT or some new-age joke
>Only one gauge with no indication, and a number in the middle, presumably the speed
>Almost no AC on the left, right has nice big vents
>Right has switches and controls for usability
>Left has nothing
>Right has comfy looking seats

>>14249434
I can understand the buttons, but what's with the hate on the gauges? t.b.h f.a.m it's a better option. It might not last 30 years, but it's not like it would be an expensive fix by the time the technology is fully integrated

File: 1986_Oldsmobile_IncasConcept1-1.jpg (104KB, 750x572px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 750x572px

>>14249420
Oldsmobile Incas

>>14249402
Left is just an unrealistic concept

File: minimalistisch-innenraum-peugeot-308.jpg (145KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1280x960px

The best

>everything you need regularly is controlled by knobs or buttons
>clean af

File: 3.jpg (468KB, 1530x992px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1530x992px

>not being metal dash, bench seat masterrace

>>14249449
Gee, I wonder why it's just a concept
>>14249798
Buttons and knobs are much better than touch screens indeed. It looks a bit bland though, IMO.

>>14249402
Becuase the one on the right is easy as fuck to fix.

>no cupholders

File: 1448495088521.jpg (14KB, 191x150px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 191x150px

>>14249860

>he brings food and drinks into his car

>>14249447
>better option
>not analog

>>14249987
>electrically operated needles
>analog

File: honda-cr-v-rd-[3252][1].jpg (686KB, 1600x1063px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 1600x1063px

>>14249402

The HUD showing navigation is kinda neat, but I miss those late 90s/early 00s interiors like pic related. It's so simple. Big, easy to use buttons and knobs that are workable if you're wearing gloves in the winter. Sensible readouts, you've got speed, RPM, fuel/temp, mechanical odometer that has a nearly audible "clunk" as it rolls over. Want to upgrade the head unit? Go ahead, it's double-din! You're not locked in to whatever shitty infotainment system the car comes with that's already obsolete by the time it rolls off the assembly line.

I'm an automotive luddite, I love how comfy and simple older dashboards and "infotainment" (I hate that word) were. I feel like I'm at work with two monitors having to constantly checking emails and updates with newer cars and their glass cockpits.

>>14250023
Electrically =/= electronically. Getting a pulse from a potentiometer to move the tach needle is not the same as a pulse from a potentiometer going to a computer to interpret it, then going to a screen.

>>14249402
>90's cheap plastic / vinyl dash buttons and shit colored interior
I don't know anyone that would want that

>>14250031
God, remember when steering wheels were simple and you had just one stalk, with maybe one or two knobs on it? Not two or more stalks with three bajillion functions each, and a steering wheel crammed with buttons/switches?

>>14250041
>touchscreen armrest is your other option
>>14250033
Realized I was thinking of the speedometer cable, my bad.

>>14250043

You had a horn and maybe cruise control on the wheel, and that's it. Now cars have more buttons than an Xbox controller on the wheels.

And whatever happened to horn buttons? Those were so easy to press with just a thumb while keeping both hands on the wheel!

>>14250048
What is bad about that? I mean its not like the touchscreen is on the arm rest, but your hand would be right there to utilize it.

>>14250031
>old man complaint
Those large buttons and knobs remind me of a jitterbug phone, lol

>>14250067
>clunky touchscreen interface takes a thousand years to respond to inputs
>have to take eyes off the road for longer
>no muscle memory

>>14249434
>a real e-break,
You are such a moron.

File: Toyota_Supra.jpg (616KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

616KB, 1280x960px

>>14249447

>>14250074

Maybe, but they're a god-send when it's 20 below, you're wearing gloves, and you just need to get the defroster working without taking off your gloves.

Or you're driving and want to change the heat without taking your eyes off the road.

Maybe I am an old man. I'm 27, nearly there already!

>>14250074
And you could adjust your A/C easily without even having to look at it, instead of fiddling around with an imprecise, slow touchscreen. Now they just make it a "press a button 5 times to switch modes, and if you miss the one you want, you have to press it five more times" style system, which also distracts the driver more than 3-knob HVAC.

>>14250082
mfw im 21 and i feel the same way


>already old

>>14250079
He did spell brake wrong, but he's right about the handle actually being connected to the cable.

>>14250077
>Laggy touch screen
Never encountered one, must suck
>No muscle memory of touch screen
It really isn't hard to learn something new. Most controls are voice activated or on the steering wheel anyways. Using a touchscreen isn't something you even really need to do while driving

>>14250096
He's wrong about everything. There's not reason to have a problem with electronic PARKING brakes. Cable actuated parking brakes can be unreliable.

>>14250082
If you can remember where the knobs are then you can remember where to touch the screen. Living where you need to wear gloves must suck though, I hope whatever your reason is for doing so is worth it.
>>14250088
>you have to press it five more times
A button or touchscreen?

>>14250088
>you could adjust your A/C easily without even having to look at it
No.

>>14250109
And you can typically either replace it with basic tools or have a sense of it starting to fail.
>>14250101
>never encountered a laggy touchscreen
So you've never used a car touchscreen?
>voice activated
"Sorry, I didn't understand that. Please say a command"
>steering wheel controls
Clog up the wheel and make it very uncomfortable or clumsy to use for actually, y'know, steering. You know where they would make sense? On the dash, where they've always been. Easy to reach for both passenger and driver.

>>14249416
>No gas pedal

>>14250122
>And you can typically either replace it with basic tools or have a sense of it starting to fail.
You don't use your parking brake, then. They can freeze up at random, and there's nothing you can fix with the cable units that you can't with the electronic.

>>14250119
>confirmed for never using 3-knob HVAC
>>14250116
You can feel around for a knob. You can't feel around on a screen.
>you have to press it five more times
A button. Say it's fan settings. You press it once, it turns on upper vents. Press it again, it turns on upper and lower. So on and so forth down to defroster + lower vents. Oops, was in a hurry, pressed it one too many times. Gotta start over. With a knob it's a defined position.

>>14250116

>I hope whatever your reason is for doing so is worth it.

I like having seasons. Spring, summer, and autumn make enduring a few months of cold worth it.

>>14250122
Haha it seems you're just going to believe what you want. Go test drive a new car though, you're mind will be blown.
You must hate airbags too, making the steering wheel all extra big and obnoxious

>>14250136
Airbags are small enough that they're not a problem. Also, where do you think I'm getting these complaints from? Driving a 2014 model car on occasion.

>>14250134
What car are you referring to? I can't imagine buying one that would work like that

>>14250139
It was a thing for some mid-2000s Ford minivan IIRC.

>>14250138
Same goes for the buttons on a steering wheel though, unless you're talking about this shit tier ones that econoboxes have added to the side

>>14250150
Yes, those ones. But buttons will also make the "spokes" of the wheel bigger (usually), which kinda sucks for a 9 and 3 driving position.

>>14249402
/o/ prefers the real interior over an illustration of an interior

SHOCKING

>>14250156
My cars buttons must just be in a good position.
>>14250148
Lol

>>14250170
If they're closer to the center the "spoke" is usually narrower, but this means they'll be harder to reach for people with smaller hands. It's a lose-lose.

>>14250123
>needing a gas pedal
That's totally 2015

>>14250178
In theory I guess that could be an issue, but I must not have tiny hands.

>>14250081
>that steering wheel, with those 90s letters

Its pretty disgusting

>>14250205
>he doesn't ironically enjoy 90s XTREME fonts

>>14250207

I like em clean and angular. 90s blotchy and pastelle isnt for my liking.

>>14249402
The one that belongs in a rwd car

>>14249828
This to be honest senpai. Old trucks are my favorite interiors.

File: 1444189097596.jpg (51KB, 670x472px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 670x472px

>>14250228
>the joke went over his head
>he is really this dumb

File: Mazda_Savanna RX-7.jpg (39KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 640x480px

the 80's had the interiors down yo

File: 100 chaser interior.jpg (2MB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1500x1000px

90s japan has the best interiors

>>14249868
How else are you supposed to eat when you drive 300+ miles a day?

>>14249402
The one on the right, if brand new would be better, but obviously looks like dog shit.

Sorry, but I prefer my environment clean when I have to
>pansy
Probably, I just don't want to end up looking like shit and driving a unkept dogshit around i.e. a shitbox.

I would choose the left one because it probably just works and don't need to maintain a lot since its a new car (assuming).

Please, don't try to be so self-righteous about cars, you know DAMN WELL you will pick the one on the left unless the one on the right is a classic or is worth a ton of money OR it has some kind of special attachment to you (an inheritance or something).
Therefore, fuck off and have a nice day.

i prefer the one that doesn't have a ridiculous amount of shit that illuminates myself at night