What does /o/ think of the new Titan Warrior Concept?
I think it looks like a Halo-
inspired truck
Link to article
http://truckyeah.jalopnik.com/what-s-the-point-of-any-beverage-container-you-can-t-cr-1752245502?utm_source=taboola
>>14227574
too much going on in front. But not sickening. The lower doors are ugly as shit.
6/10 IMO.
Even the interior is Halo-y
>>14227574
>>14227615
>no manual
Too future-y, also
>jalopnik
>>14227588
>>14227808
It's just a concept, brosef. I doubt they'd actually go for that look in production
Its cool but good luck selling those over the raptors unless theyre cheaper and offer 0 % APR when you walk in with a flat brim trucker hat on.
>>14227574
It looks like they tried to make a Raptor...
>>14228138
And did a better job
>>14227574
Fuck it I'm embracing the future. Edge me up inside. Gimme dem neon colors, slap on the giant black plastic grills, and throw in some angry headlights, I'm going all in.
Gimme the 300hp Cummins 5.0L V8 in it and you got yourself a deal!
>>14230085
>310 HP 555 LB-FT
Sorry nissan your over a decade behind in the HD world.
>>14230122
>Sorry nissan your over a decade behind in the HD world.
>in a half ton truck
Cool story bro. Keep at with your 3.0 V6 1500 Ram though.
>>14230137
After checking google its 15 years behind domestic 3/4 tons. Gtfo nissan shill.
>>14230195
>After checking google its 15 years behind an irrelevant category
And 3/4 tons are 30 years behind Class 8s.
>>14230196
>>14230219
>moving goalposts
You're the one comparing a 1/2 ton to a class of 3/4 tons.
Tell me about the domestic brand 1/2 ton diesel options again?
>>14228138
I was going to say the same thing
>>14230226
5/8th ton.
http://autoweek.com/article/car-reviews/2016-nissan-titan-xd-first-drive-true-5-8-ton-pickup
>we cant compete in a segment so were going to make a new class.
Nissan seems to do that with pieces of shit.
Example:
>>14230272
And yet, you try compare it to 3/4 ton HD trucks?
>equipping a 1/2 ton with heavier duty options that completely outclass the competition and marketing it as such
>a bad thing
And yet Ram persists with a Fiat diesel V6...
>>14227791
>wanting a manual on a truck
>>14230331
The only advantage for automatic trucks is more metro multi drops, or running a fleet driven by ham fisted operators.
I'd prefer a manual in my personal truck all day, every day.
>>14230308
At least we agree on that garbage fiat diesel. But seriously think like an american for a second. That truck starts at 45k base est. You can get every single domestic base 3/4 diesels for less. What american is going to pay more for 40% less power? The only thing thats going to help that truck is the cummins in it, but for 39k you can have a base 2500 ram with an 800 ftlbs cummins. That nissan shitbox is at least 10k too much.
>>14230390
>That truck starts at 45k base est.
Nice exaggeration.
>$40 290 msrp with crew cab and Cummins diesel
Let's option a similarly equipped diesel Ram 1500 Tradesman HFE Quad Cab, and watch as it turns out less than $1500 cheaper. Not sure where you get the idea it's "at least 10k too much".
People who need the commercial HD option (or convince themselves they need it) will buy the 3/4 ton competition. This is perfect for those not pulling a 40000 lb goose neck or requiring a 5000lb payload, but still need a tough contractor truck that doesn't drive like a HD truck.
>>14230414
And source to the prices;
http://www.ramtrucks.com/hostc/bmo/CUT201613/models.do?ccode=CUT201613DS1H61F&llp=2TS
http://www.nissanusa.com/trucks/titan
I will concede, the Ram price includes dealer delivery charges. But then it's got 3/5ths the powerplant.
>>14227574
Looks like a matchbox car.
I love it.
>>14228138
>build a concept competitor to the Raptor
>It looks like they tried to make a Raptor...
#redundantstatements
>>14227574
>jalopnik