Hey guys, I was wondering if someone here could have a look through the link below, which is only a couple of short pages, and tell me if they see anything resembling a carburettor. From what I understand, a carburettor is a device that mixes air and fuel in an internal combustion engine, and the air and fuel is certainly mixed in the patent below, so I was wondering if this might be an example of an early carburettor. Much appreciated thanks.
Fucking what link?
I think a carburetor is explicitly fuel and air mixed via vacuum
>>14206951
Whoops I meant this link:
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WdtSgduauyUC&pg=PA154&lpg=PA154&dq=Robert+Street+Patent&source=bl&ots=GSrqltmwrA&sig=nRdva118UiC8oiDH_53w0vaD6JY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi2vYXGmZ7KAhUCsxQKHXpeBpwQ6AEIITAB#v=onepage&q=Robert%20Street%20Patent&f=false
>>14207008
ain't nobody got time for that shit man
>>14207008
it's an entire engine, sperglord.
>>14207013
It's only a few (I think 3) pages, and short ones at that.
>>14207038
What do you mean by this? If you aren't willing to help me, could you at least tell me which board I should try where I could find people who are?
>>14207062
I mean it's an entire engine, sperglord. It's a fucking cylinder in which a fuel/air mixture is burned to drive a piston. There is no carburetor; you can think of it as a direct-injection engine with some old time faggot doing the injection manually.
It's no surprise you couldn't understand ye olde patent when you can't even understand "it's an entire engine."
>>14207081
>op's face when
>>14207081
Wait, I thought it was impossible to build a liquid-fuel non-diesel ICE without a carburettor or modern fuel injection. Are you telling me it actually is possible to build a liquid-fuel ICE without a carburettor with late 18th-century technology?
>>14207316
Well, that just goes to show that you don't actually understand the concept of an internal combustion engine.
it's that there venturi principle