hey /o/ i don't usually come here a lot for help but I've

saged for normalfagginess

>>14194289
A black Ford F150.

File: mitsubishi eclipse.jpg (190KB, 1956x1180px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1956x1180px

fourth gen eclipse
normies think it looks exotic

>>14194289
Get an EVO. Dont get an STI cause we dont want more dude bros ruining the best car in the world.

>>14194412
ok ill get an sti. thanks man.

>>14194412
Evos look better desu.

What's the price range op

File: Renault Twingo (2).jpg (397KB, 1617x1146px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 1617x1146px

>>14194289

File: Toyota-Celica-2014-5.jpg (159KB, 640x477px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 640x477px

7th generation celica + bright paint job + body kit
Maintenance is cheap because it's just a shitbox that looks like a sports car. Grills certainly won't be able to tell the difference.
Should be able to find one under $4k easily.

>>14194404
I know these are slow but are they otherwise gud and fun? Not just this but non-Evo sporty cars made by Mits.

>>14194455
The GTs are actually decently quick.

>>14194464
is that the v6 version?
0-60 times puts them at 6 seconds flat to 60 which is pretty quick, yeah, not half bad.

>>14194488
Yeah, you could get a 6spd too.

>dat MiVEC

>>14194529
how much time of those 6 seconds does it spend broken? I know very little on mitsubishi reliability aside from "bad"

>>14194464
>discover top trim 3000GT's came in AWD
>realize they are too rare to own one

Fug

>>14194529
The only Eclipse that ever got a bad knock for reliability was the 2nd gen 7 bolt turbo motor, mostly with '95 MY.

>>14194567
>Mits
>unreliable

Lancer is rated the most reliable car in the last 16 years.

>>14194592
>he didn't know why they were called VR4

They're really not that rare, just all of them have broken down.

>>14194593
Meant for
>>14194567

>>14194597
Sauce?