Should euroncap and the US safety organisation include visibility when rating car safety levels?
e.g. 3 quarters of the rating is given by how the car holds up in a crash, 1 quarter is given by visibility
>>16844230
the US should make seatbelt mandatory first
>>16844230
they don't care about visibility, crash avoidance through driver ability is pretty much not accounted for in any testing. this oversight will eventually lead to driverless cars with no windows at all
Yes, but manufacturers would just circumvent it with bells and whistles.
It has been a bad couple of weeks for my family's cars and motorcycles, /o/. Several mechanical failures and a bike accident to boot. I suspect that I may have been insufficiently pious. Therefore, in addition to wrenching and recuperating, I intend to build a small shrine or make some appropriate sacrifices to the gods of /o/. But I don't know who they are, nor exactly what I should give (though I have some ideas.). Help me out?
>pic possibly related
>shrine made of broken clutch plates?
>burn a little gasoline in front of it as an offering
Pray to Scotty Kilmer, god of mechanics
Pray to Volvo 240, god of battle tanks
our lord and savior, born in a manger, three unwise men gifting him shampoo, frankincense, and a gameboy
ITT we post things to trigger people(no GM btfo edition)
>>16843975
Is that a fucking ls
>>16843977
Hell yeah
>>16843975
Dunnit just make it an Audi competitor then, but with a shit interior?
What is wrong with the Prius?
>>16843812
it's gay lol
>>16843812
it´s a dull, slow shitty car.
Toyota usually puts an effort into catering to enthusiasts even in cars like rav 4 or by making a mid engined minivan or by giving startlet awd or some shit.
Prius is just a fucking dull, slow boring, sluggish piece of fucking shit, only driven by retards who think they´re saving the planet but they could do better in a v6 by keeping off the throttle
its a hybrid gas saver that i would only daily if i was paid to drive it. Zero power, handle like crap at least the early generations and its all around not attractive especially the interior
Coming in 2019
>52k-100k+
>400 HP 240 mile range - 1000 HP 400 mile range
>Working prototypes
>Factory under contruction
Where were you when Tesla was BTFO?
https://techcrunch.com/2017/03/16/the-lucid-air-electric-car-starts-at-just-60000-before-tax-credit/
Sweet 5th gen Celica bro.
Don't get hyped yet, half of the shit they're saying about the car doesn't make financial sense at this price range, unless they're selling at a loss which they aren't.
Ugly as fuck. Why can't they make a good looking Electric car...
PFFFFFTHHAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
2007 was 10 years ago faggot
>>16843558
this is not real
>ninety thousand dollars
HHAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
>lowering your car
>>16843499
>lowering your car for non-race purposes.
>tfw just got a really good deal on some megan coilovers
>they're in the mail right now
>im going to put them on my car and drop it at least 3-4 inches to get rid of my horrendous wheel gap
>>16843524
wheel gaps are sexy desu
I'm one step from buying this car - should I go for it?
>1.4 - 85hp
>around £500
>1990
>good condition
>very customizable
It'd be my first car
>>16843416
gt or bust
>>16843416
it's a good car at that price
DOET
DOET FGT
Do cars with smaller displacement engines and less cylinders get better fuel economy than cars with bigger displacements and more cylinders?
For example, would a 1.2 litre 3 cylinder engine always return better mpg's than a 2.0 litre 4 cylinder engine?
Assume that both cars are petrol, are driven in the same manner, at same speeds, and are in the same condition (tyres, regularly serviced etc)
>>16843348
weight, aerodynamic, style of driving
>>16843376
>style of driving
as i said, assume both cars are driven in the same manner
>>16843348
Usually yes. The only time it isnt true is if the car is very heavy and the smaller engine has too little power. Then you have to mash the pedal to go anywhere and it ruins the fuel economy
This deserves a second thread based on how often its asked
>>16804736
Why is it so FUCKING hard to find a head unit that doesn't look like FUCKING RICER SHIT and isn't ridiculously expensive.
Couple boss headunits are cheap ($100 range) and have all the features, and they arnt overly alien looking
Because stereo manufacturers hate you.
Because normies only change their head units when it fails and go to the stealership to get a new OEM. The only people who want a different head unit are ricers and so manufacturers appeal to them with obnoxious designs.
>Selling shitter 90's altima
>Need something affordable and sporty
>04 350z Manual for 6 grand.
Is it worth?
>>16843230
Yes. It's a good damn enthusiast car.
Ignore all the pigfat bench racers.
Wat is mileage
I was thinking about closing on an 07 350z roadster for 7k with 87k miles, but ended up getting a 2003 G35 with 76k miles for 5900. Does /o/ think this was a good buy?
DO YOU LIKE!
>>16843228
wat
>>16843228
clean your truck you filthy animal
>>16843265
She gets dusty from chipping wood.
Every day
Why are FWD cars hated so much? Yes, FWD is a compromise, but you always ignore thet for the same price an FWD car will most likely have superior suspension and chassis, because the manufacturer spent less on the drivetrain. Adn at the same time you get the benefit of a more spacious or compact car. It is a compromise in the same way that a muscle car is a compromise, because the latter will have a lot of power but it will be pigfat and with shit suspension/chassis. D9ont't get me wrong, if all other things were equal the RWD would always be better, but people always focus their hate on FWD rather than other compromises. Oh, and people who drive an automatic and consider themselves "enthusiasts" because it's RWD are delusional, manual FWD>auto RWD
pic related: a fast and cheap FWD car
>>16843115
>Why are FWD cars hated so much
They aren't. It's just a busrider meme.
>Oh, and people who drive an automatic and consider themselves "enthusiasts" because it's RWD are delusional
Spot the "my povo-spec 90s Civic is a racecar because m...muh RACEKAR manual tranny" Ameriturd.
>>16843115
FWD's are good for econoboxes or cars where eprformance isn't important.
All fwd cars would be so much better as RWD
FWD cars are boring and have limit to how much power they can make
I'd rather buy an rwd car for same price and upgrade suspension and chassis than buy an fwd.
Fwd is just boring.
Not to mention having front wheels do steering, breaking and accelarating while rear wheels just tag along is stupid for performance.
Sure some fwd cars do fine but that's not the point.
Also fwd is way less fun in snow.
>>16843115
i drive a focus rs by myself and know exactly what u mean. it´s a ton of fun to drive on narrow landside streets.
The point is: A FWD can never powerslide, which is also a ton of fun.
But as you said, i wouldn´t buy a RWD just for the rwd´s sake. you get definitely better FWD´s then RWD´s for the same money
>rev up to 5.5k rpm
>smell burning
>>16842868
>go full throttle in 5th gear doing 50 mph
>smell burning smell
>>16842868
> start car, smell burning
Turns out it was my alternator stator arching out.
> never gotten to 4k RPM
>not driving an electric car
[ D a i l y B i k e T h r e a d ] - /dbt/
ALL bikes are best bikes // if it's got 2 wheels and a manual gearbox it's awesome // riding a best edition
>/dbt/ map
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?msa=0&mid=z7CKLSFiJH_M.kMZoQpBOKipI
>Motorcycle Ergonomics Simulator
http://cycle-ergo.com/
>Noob? Read this:
>>10361928
>Weeaboos with sound
>>>/wsg/1564043
>Previously on /dbt/
>>16840359
Second for dual sport tire is best tire
>>16842645
>best tyre
>not a BT45
funny guy
>>16842649
>BT45
That's not even the battleax to get.
S21 or get out
Also,
>not a dual sport tire