I am almost driven to suicide. I see these articles everyday now. "White men between 40 and 50 years old is the problem".
This isn't like American news where they are trying to hide it, no, here they just say it. White men are the problem.
I want to see these journalists die. I want to see them die... Is there any way that in a short period of time something
will lead to the death of European journalists?
I can't read runes but if white men between 40-50 are those most opposed to ideas of social progression then they are the issue.
Old white guys rarely have to question the way the world works because they are top of the pile. Nothing worse than someone with power denying improvements of quality of life to those with no power.
history doesnt progress in straight line towards some goal thats a very religious sentiment. Theres is absolutely nothing indicating Humanity is going to "Progress" to your hair brained idea of Utopia
I never said it progresses towards a goal. I said it progresses. There are patterns and correlations we can observe.
Its funny that you mention religion, since as societies become more educated religion becomes less important
As women become more educated birth rates drop
As democracy increases so do standards of living and freedom of speech
Likewise, those who stand in the way of measures which improve indicators of standards of living (income, happiness, freedom) for those in society with the lowest standards of living are those who, as a demographic, have higher standards of living.
Someone pointed out to me that Scandinavia has a very strange way of dealing with elders. In Slavic countries there is a tradition of taking care of your grandpas and grandmas, but in "higher" developed countries, there seems to be complete lack of respect for your elders, as well as sending them to special community houses, or even doing euthanasia. It's a little disheartening, but maybe this is where such attitude comes from.
However, you didn't specify why there are a problem, which social progression are they opposed them, and what are their arguments. That was a very scarce newspost
And why do you think those people stand in the way of those measures of 'improvement'? Is it because they're sexist, racist, xenophobic, religious bigots? Or is that maybe they want to preserve the higher standard of living they earned rather than gradually sacrifice it so that a kid at McDonalds can earn $15 an hour? "Progression" through cultural marxism is hardly progression to anyone but the absolute lowest of the low who can't even pull themselves up by their bootstraps to the rest of society. There are much better ways to help the downtrodden.
At least revolution is coming from the right this cycle
But unfortunately it feels like the world is slowly edging towards full on socialism which will be doomed to fail.. Probably a preclude to some giant future war in 200 years
Left wing is the problem.
They are a suicidal guilt driven cult.
They want to flood our countries with primitive impossible to assimilate third-worlders who in the long run will destroy our societies.
And their fantasies about social progress will be the first to perish.
Of course its because they want to preserve their higher standard of living. But that is what is deplorable. It is not guaranteed that their quality of life would diminish, and even if it did it would be by such an insignificant amount as to be irrelevant. No one benefits from income inequality. The economy benefits when money is more liquid, businesses improve, revenues increase and "wealth creators" feel the benefit.
How would you propose to help the downtrodden? I would be interested to hear. Also curious as to what you think cultural marxism is. I google it and all that comes up are right wing sites that don't seem to understand marxist theory.
Fucking whitey and his superior genetics
Why isn't everything fair and equal so that stinking 3rd worlders with 75 IQs can be just as successful as Europeans? The answer is clearly racism, now gibs me dat.
>How would you propose to help the downtrodden
Free enterprise, or everything that made America successful back in the day.
Oh but wait that requires people to be smart and work hard, so I guess we should subsidize the failures of humanity so that nobody has to live in icky discomfort, because surely that's sustainable for our population as we inch towards 10 billion people on the planet.
Back in the day taxes were also higher top rate of tax was around 50%. Should we bring that back too?
You can have aspects of socialism without destroying the free market. If you understood market design you would understand that not all markets are natural and some require intervention to reach their most efficient state.
>You can have aspects of socialism without destroying the free market
Oh so by removing the free market's ability to operate normally we can still have a free market.
Super duper, this make sense. Thank you anon you are a torch in the dark.
>Life as a white man in Norway must be really hard.
>that passive-agressive tone with vile irrational hatred for white people
Why are you so frustrated against other people?
What have norwegians done to you?
Norway is a norwegian country made by norwegian people inhabited by its natives,life for them is how they made it to be,what is it to you?
You do realize than if genetic modification on humans even becomes legal, people won't be lining up to have white children the same way people don't line up on sperm banks for white people's jizz? Believe it or not, not everyone feels jealous of white people.
No, you haven't seen them then.
Here's a clue:
>The NBA in 2015 was composed of 74.4 percent black players, 23.3 percent white players, 1.8 percent Latinos (of any race), and 0.2 percent Asian.
>More Than 2/3 (68 percent) of NFL Players are African-American
Probably because you implied there is such a thing as a non-white Norwegian.
Norwegians have fair skin and bore of the country of Norway, with unique Norwegian culture.
Your universal "white old men" and what not, don't exist.
Let me correct my friend, there is no such thing as completely superior and inferior, but there are significant differences.
>If it becomes legal
Top laugh, don't act like it won't be legal once China starts doing it. The entire world will enter a genetic arms race to create the best population possible, otherwise you'll just be BTFO on every level by the countries that create better humans.
The very moment the technology is there it's over, and nobody's going to be lining up to make their kids darker.
Eventually a global caste system of new humans and old humans will develop, and likely one will be wiped out for good or just modified to be drones or something equally worthless.
Might as well, m8. You'd be doing us other snowniggers a favour.
Anyway, nice cherrypicking and missing the point of the article.
For those here who don't speak Norwegian, I'll clear things up.
First of all, our lovely OP makes it sound like the article's headline is "White men between 40 and 50 years old is the problem", and then goes on to mutter something about killing journalists. The actual headline is: "Headhunter about the CEOs: – White, ethnically Norwegian male in his 40s-50s". In other words, this is actually an interview, and the headline is a quote by the person that's interviewed.
Then, I'll have to say what the article is actually about. It's not, as most of you seem to think, about white men being the issue when it comes to social progress. It's in fact a interview piece with a professional headhunter focusing on the fact that the vast majority of CEOs in state owned companies are white males of this age group. This is in relation to larger discussion that's going on in Norway right now. Furthermore, the headhunter in question says that it isn't only a matter of ethnicity or gender, but also age. The fact that the leadership in these companies are built of almost only one group that recruits only people like themselves is according to the headhunter a problem, for example stating that she thinks it keeps resourceful people that are of another ethnicity, female, too young, or too old out of these companies, thus weakening them.
You might still have issue about the contents of the interview, but at least I'm being honest about the contents.
Anyway, I guess it's time that you start calling me a liberal or whatever, It's to /pol/ way.
>getting in the way of "social progress"
Define progress, and especially "social progress"
>the vast majority of Norwegian CEOs are white males 40-50
First off, this is injecting race unnecessarily, Norwegians are fair skinned people bore of the nation of Norway, so yes all Norwegians are white. Second off, Men are more capable in stressful positions like managers and CEOs where big and harsh decisions are needed. Third, their age has nothing to do with it.
This headhunters opinion is nothing but anti-norwegian sentiment and an uneducated and unexperienced view of how the business world, and life itself works.
She is more racist, sexist, and ageist than a Nazi.
You migth want to reread my post, m8. As I said, the article doesn't talk about social progress, or anything like that. It's strictly directed towards the debate surrounding leadership culture in state owned companies.
OP is just very blatantly trying to pass it off as being something that it isn't. If you want to discuss this subject, then that's fine, but be aware that you're not talking about the same thing that the original article is.
Following that (and I won't go at lenght, as I have no desire to discuss these matters at 3 AM, especially as I just wanted to call OP out on his deception) I can't see any logic in your argument. Is it not negative for a meritocratic system to keep some people outside for reasons not related to their actual skills? You do, for example say that age has nothing to do with it. Does this mean that you think people in their 30s shouldn't be included into the leadership of these companies?
>She is more racist, sexist, and ageist than a Nazi.
This is completely nonsensical.
The headhunter in question is interviewed about the situation, gives her description of it, and explains why she thinks this is hurting the companies. Somehow that's worse than Nazism. She doesn't even call out for any specific, drastic measures, except expecting that these companies follow the guidelines they'll eventually be given by the state.
To put it another way, you do not know what you're talking about. Which isn't surprising, seeing as you can't actually read the article in question.
>94% of sports are dominated worldwide by europeans and white americans as seen by http://www.games-encyclo.org/index.php?id=21633&L=1
>but muh basketball and american football
Well damn,all that affirmative action in giving sport schorlarships to blacks coupled with the fact that blacks only bother to play the only 2 sports they're good at does get you there
There,I clapped for that 74.4% black NBA,does it make you happy?
Blacks can play basketball,whites can play everything else,that is what your post proved me.
I expect it to be based as close by either merit or ability, nothing less.
There is no reason to keep an uneducated nigger around where he is not needed, or a women who does not do better than a man. There is no issue in the current system, and there is no diabolical scheme. It's just a resultant of natural economic states.
Call me when they evolve out of running and jumping for money and join the rest of society.
>Blacks taking over hockey
There's like 30 black guys playing hockey in both Canada and the US combined.
>Actual Football to Australian Rules Football, to Hockey and Cricket.
I kek'd ,the football thing is true in France and Belgium where the people simply don't give a shit about football and playing football,only old farts are still "fans" in the 21st century and poorfricans.
The woman the article is about is basically nobody. It's one of those articles that draws in and confirms the views of whoever it appeals to and pisses off those it doesn't appeal to. Either way everyone clicks on it It literally says nothing of value.
Society has not become less religious, rather, the dominant religion has simply occulted itself by casting off the trappings of things modern westerners associate with protestant christianity, (which is what they think of when they think of the word religion [not to be confused with Religion]) while maintaining the same functional doctrines.
You don't deserve things just for existing.
Failure is society's way of sorting out the strong from the weak. Subsidizing the habitually worthless does nothing to strengthen us as either a bloodline, a society, or a species, and a glut of weakness drags us all down, so if you aren't able to raise your family out of abject poverty, or at least set the stage for the next generation to do so, then you belong exactly where you are.
Nobody's going to babysit you when the world comes on hard times, so all the gorillions of dirt poor subhumans that we're currently keeping alive for no reason will drop dead the moment we're not around to care for them, and that's not really doing them any favors in the long term, so go make something for yourself and learn how to preserve and pass it down, or don't and doom your descendants to live in the gutter and die at the first sign of large scale societal turmoil.
White people never comitted any crimes in the past because first of all, slavery for example wasnt a crime so you can't imply guilt where theres none. 2 everyone was raping and killing each others at the time, if you are here now that means one of your ancestors managed to rape a lot.
3.LIBERALS ARE RETARDED
erase your existence.
Now now simetric violence will never fix anything.
Shove your cultural marxist ideology up your loose liberal asshole and travel to germany because the flikflik quota could use some culturally enriched progressive butthole for public cumstorage.
Slavery and colonialism were the best things that ever happened to black people. I mean, just look at where they are now without it. If progs actually cared about black people instead of just competing in social signaling games with other white people to prove who's 'holier', they'd roll that shit back as soon as possible (not that I'm saying you should care about black people mind).
Well, let's be specific here. Slavery was great for blacks when it was European slavery.
The Muslims took upwards of 20+ million slaves over 1300 years, with another 80 million butchered horribly or dying on the way to being enslaved.
>people won't be lining up to have white children the same way people don't line up on sperm banks for white people's jizz?
They do though. Danish sperm banks are the biggest exporters in the world in their field. Other Scandinavian countries would also be up there if it weren't for stringent local regulations.