Is this the ugliest train you've every seen /n/?

File: maxresdefault.jpg (214KB, 1762x924px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1762x924px

QUACK QUACK
YOU CAN ONLY POST IN THIS THREAD IF YOUR CUNT HAS QUACK TRAINS

>>904748
That thing has far bigger problems than just being plain ugly. A fate perhaps worse than ending up in the middle of Libya

>>904686
It's not THAT ugly...

>caring about appearances
There are actual useful specifications you could care about instead.

>>904686
I like it

File: EMU356_ASR1.jpg (147KB, 1280x816px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1280x816px

this is an ugly train

File: Electric_train_at_Ruhpolding_-_geo.hlipp.de_-_3966.jpg (68KB, 640x541px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 640x541px

>>904686
Post some ugly trains

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>849122

File: Class_82_KTM_Komuter_train,_Kuala_Lumpur.jpg (893KB, 2186x1226px) Image search: [Google]

893KB, 2186x1226px

Not only they're ugly, they are also unserviceable because the company that made them already folded

>>904898
That shouldn't be a problem if the purchase would have been made smartly, that is including the essential schematics.

>inb4 no capitalist company does that!!!

>>904909
open source 4 lyfe

>>904743
based renfe, you can suck a dick desu

>>904823
not ugly, beautifully utilitarian

>>904844
fucking ugly

File: a98e8895c479e22cab88afa95532c30e.jpg (100KB, 736x1125px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 736x1125px

>>904844
design by

File: 2589593585.jpg (47KB, 670x376px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 670x376px

>>904785
don't even get me started family

File: FyraAfter.jpg (38KB, 567x291px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 567x291px

>>904785
>>906074
NEVER let italians build trains for you

File: D__KB20150831009-749x415.jpg (74KB, 749x415px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 749x415px

the inside of that train once the kebabs left was the ugliest I've ever seen.

>>904844
Originally from best Germany right?

>>904909
You meant maintenance? Almost every company provides that; LRU,field level maintenance and whatnot.

Problem is when heavier shit starts breaking down (the engine mainly, things that require heavy repair and replacement of whole subunits). Usually only OEM would do this, unless the rail company is willing to pay tons of money to do that shit in-house (which is only logical if the number of train being bought is large enough).

For example, Malaysian rail companies bought so many trains (commuter EMU, intercity EMU, light metro LRV, even some electric locomotives to replace them diesel locos) from one chink company that said company is willing to build a factory there and transferred all (but the best, such as igh-speed train) the technology for the Malaysian to build their train domestically.

>>906138
Yes, but modernised after the merge of the respective railway systems.

>>906255
So when were they built, in the 1970s?
Because i remember seeing a black-white picture of a set being pulled by a steam train.

File: 5937791142_7b026bc97d_b.jpg (570KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 1024x683px

Southwest trains ancient class 455

>>906304
It would only be moderately ugly in any other livery apart from that. Southwest trains livery is sickeningly bad.

File: et403_%28C%29-Torsten_Giesen.jpg (78KB, 694x436px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 694x436px

>>904743
These were nicknamed Donald Duck, especially in the Lufthansa livery.

>>909545
Didn't some company plan to bring them back into service?

>>910776
Just looked it up, deleted previous comment because it was wrong.
It seems like one will be brought back for regular use. Interior and wiring appear to still be in work though.

>>904686
>Is this the ugliest train you've every seen /n/?

No, that was the train we ran on your mum.

>>904844

Oh, my.

>>909545
Aw yes, the Toblerone Express.

>>904823
You're an ugly train

File: IMG_20160105_160021.jpg (532KB, 1080x1719px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1080x1719px

All trains are beautiful

File: endmysuffering.png (159KB, 427x251px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 427x251px

>>904748