[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
what's the most wrong pitchfork have...
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music

Thread replies: 36
Thread images: 8
what's the most wrong pitchfork have ever been?

>inb4 who cares about their scores
>>
Daft Punk - Discovery
>>
Lateralus
>>
>>61982407
Overly cluttered with filler and such type of electronic music with the le crazy percussion meme are the soulless wank of electronic music. Score is deserved.

>>61982414
Review is terribly written, but that album is actually nothing original and just stealing ideas from the guys in Chicago.
>>
I usually check the p4k scores but don't take it ultra seriously. Just a reference, sometimes they are on the spot.
Worst rating scores are the weezer ones lmao p4k hates them
>>
>>61982407
When exactly did pitchfork assert it's dominance in the field of rating music, as far as popularity and influence goes? When and how did they climb to the top?
>>
>>61982407

>what's the most wrong pitchfork have ever been?

MBDTF
>>
>>
>>61982455
>Pinkerton: 10
>Green Album: 4.0
>Maladroit: 5.4
>Make Believe: 0.4
>The Red Album: 4.7
>Raditude: 4.5
>Hurley: 5.0
>EWBAITE: 6.5
Other than Red and Raditude being too high, this seems to line up with /mu/'s opinion on Weezer.
>>
>>61982407
>implying anyone does
>inb4ing your own post
Fuck off newfag.
>>
File: 4UVzla2.png (490 KB, 667x3417) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
4UVzla2.png
490 KB, 667x3417
>>
File: Capture.png (499 KB, 654x711) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Capture.png
499 KB, 654x711
>>
>>61982619
Wrong thread?
>>
Pitchfork hates long IDM releases
They did the same for Exai
>>
>>61982619
Objectibly right.
It's like if Aaron tried to be Liam Gallagher
>>
File: 808.png (199 KB, 703x566) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
808.png
199 KB, 703x566
>>61982448
Drukqs was honestly really good, maybe even ahead of its time.
>>
>>61982448

>but that album is actually nothing original and just stealing ideas from the guys in Chicago.

Are you confusing Discovery with Homework? Because Homework was their Chicago house record. Regarding Discovery, they put it second or third on their top albums of the 2000s list.
>>
>>61982619
they fucking destroyed that band
probably Ryan's biggest scalp
>>
>>61982576
thanks for the contribution buddy
>>
I don't care how much you dislike the new Pixies material; Jayson Greene is a whiny bitch who's surpised a 2014 Pixies doesn't sound like 1990 Pixies. Fucking awful set of reviews.
>>
>>61982619
That's their truest review though
>>
File: Capture.png (253 KB, 612x324) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Capture.png
253 KB, 612x324
>>
>>61982971
yeah this is the correct choice
>>
>>61982619
That is pretentious and childish as fuck but I can't help but kek everytime. Shit band so who cares.
>>
>>61982615
fuck man i thought this was a shitpost.
how the fuck does anyone take these guys seriously?
>>
>>61982448
>Overly cluttered with filler and such type of electronic music with the le crazy percussion meme are the soulless wank of electronic music. Score is deserved.
What about Avril 14th?
>Review is terribly written, but that album is actually nothing original and just stealing ideas from the guys in Chicago.
This proves that you don't really know a lot about electronic music, Discovery is really synth-pop inspired and fused with house in way that hadn't been done until Discovery.
>>
ALT-J
>>
Frances the Mute obviously
And I don't get it, really, they gave high scores to stuff that was a lot wankier
>>
>>61982734
Shit shoop my friend
>>
>>61982407
Who cares lol
>>
>>61982512
What the fuck didn't realise they give it a score this low. It's an immense album
>>
>>61983044
yeah, those scores should be lower
>>
>>61982407

Drukqs is a 6.5, not more than that.
>>
File: 904873520.png (197 KB, 677x327) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
904873520.png
197 KB, 677x327
>>
>>61982971
This.
>>
there is so much to hate about pitchfork that caring about what they rate albums is literally the most pleb thing you could hate about them.
Thread replies: 36
Thread images: 8
Thread DB ID: 469149



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.