is there any art that isn't pretentious

ween

>>61782442
daniel johnston

Art Pop

Grateful Dead

>>61782442
massive concrete or stone sculpture

Nirvana

pretentious is just a word for stuff i don't like

That hasn't came out in the last 16 years?

>>61782442
All art is an expression of an exaggerated affect.

So no.

File: 1447015912581.jpg (78KB, 771x547px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 771x547px

>>61782496

Mr Bungle

if the artist pretends to have a greater significance than they possess in reality, they are pretentious. Significance, though, is subjective, which is why you see idiot dadrockers call radiohead pretentious hacks, and /mu/ users call merzbow pretentious. it's all relative man

>>61782442
The answer is either, no, all art is pretentious, or yes, no art is pretentious.

>>61782540
good point

>>61782484
highly underrated post

>>61782489
yuh

>>61782566
... d ... a ... m ... n ...

my farts

mark kozelek

>>61782589
c...u...c...k

File: big get.jpg (9KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 250x250px

this is now a baneposting thread

>>61782664
>implying Turner is pretentious

File: MI0000678327.jpg (34KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 400x400px

>>61782442

depending on how you look at it, human expression could be seen as inherently pretentious
who cares though

The Eagles? Guns & Roses? Foo Fighters?

Normie shit

>>61782457
>>61782487
not art pls go