> This is the most subjective history of rock music that one could possibly write. But also the most impartial, independent, and balanced.
what did he mean by this?
are scaruffi's books just 1000 pieces of a4 paper stapled together?
>He's a damn good writer
no hes not
and this is coming from someone who actually likes him and reads the site
once you read a lot of reviews you start to see he uses the same terms/phrases over and over- Dante-esque, nuclear holocaust, apocalypse, bacchanal, etc. You can see he has a flowery but very mechanical way of writing about music.