> This is the most subjective history of rock music that one could possibly write. But also the most impartial, independent, and balanced.
what did he mean by this?
12 YEAR OLDS
>>61764069
He wanted to sell his book.
He failed miserably.
>all dem 1 star reviews lmao
>>61764069
>impartial, independent, and balanced.
https://rateyourmusic.com/board_message?message_id=5352201
>>61764086
are scaruffi's books just 1000 pieces of a4 paper stapled together?
>>61764069
That's actually a good fucking question. He's a massive hypocrite. He's a damn good writer, though. He should just be more intellectually honest with his readers.
>>61764174
>He's a damn good writer, though
Yeah! His poetry is fire.
http://www.scaruffi.com/poetry/apophenia.html
>>61764170
kek
>>61764174
>He's a damn good writer
no hes not
and this is coming from someone who actually likes him and reads the site
once you read a lot of reviews you start to see he uses the same terms/phrases over and over- Dante-esque, nuclear holocaust, apocalypse, bacchanal, etc. You can see he has a flowery but very mechanical way of writing about music.
>hurrr I've listened to non-existant BoC records
>>61764174
>He's a damn good writer
i think he's a godawful writer. he just has good taste in music
>>61766157
No, he just has a taste similar to yours
>>61766213
damn...