[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
Pitchfork
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music

Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 1
Why is this allowed?
>>
>>61746619
they're all cvcks, friend.
>>
lmao desu
>>
They brainwashed this entire board as well.

This used to be a mostly rock/"indie" oriented place, now it's Plebddit/KTT/Twitter/Tumblr: The 4chan board.
>>
>>61746619
best i ever had would be in the top 10 if p4k had changed their demographic back then.
>>
UNBEARABLE WHITENESS OF MUSIC
>>
BIG
>>
I don't really follow p4k, but let me say this:

Point number 1:
I really do not care about the skin color of the artist who makes the music, i care about the music itself, which is what should really count. pitchfork should not take into account how much people from X skin color should be in a list, they should make the list purely on the quality of the albums.

Point 2:
With all that said,
Knowing p4k, i do think there is a degree of "trying to fix racism" by giving higher ratings to African Americans, which is actually trying to fix racism with a different kind of racism, which is kind of ironic. But even then, your complain should not be just that there are alot of African Americans in that list, because when you put it in this way it just seems racist. in my opinion, you should have stated in your op that the unreasonable rise of Africans Americans on this list is an indication that p4k are overrating this artists to try and "counter racism". the way you expressed things in the op with "why is this allowed" might be interpreted as if you think it's not legitimate under any circumstances to have a large number of African Americans in the chart.
>>
black music has improved
>>
>>61747766

I think it's self-explanatory.

>>61748500

Black music peaked with jazz/soul/funk, all which are dead genres now.
>>
It's not even a race thing, it's just because those songs are trendier/BNM is usually paid for.
>>
>>61746619
>pitchfork started out as an indie rock (a mostly white genre) publication
>gradually became a mainstream publication
Why is this hard to understand? Pitchfork got much more popular since 2009 and has been reviewing more mainstream music
Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 1
Thread DB ID: 440814



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.