Is the fact they're black the only reason I'm supposed to care about this?
They're black?
Oh wow. 15 years listening to this and I never knew.
and that they ripped off the stooges
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axGsg3fPm84
That and it kind of is proto punk, and came out around or slightly before the ramones and was from Detroit.
The music is okay, but not even anything super important for its time.
If you like it, cool, does it deserve the recognition its gotten? Fuck no.
>>61642384
Some music is undeservedly forgotten. None is undeservedly remembered.
>>61642360
>15 years
weren't they rediscovered like a few years ago?
>>61642384
>it kind of is proto punk, and came out around or slightly before the ramones
which the stooges did before them
I remember coming across there music while looking for the other Death. Didn't care too much for it
>>61642402
I don't know what that means.
I just found a shitty discount cassette at my local music store way back when so I got it.
>>61642384
>That and it kind of is proto punk, and came out around or slightly before the ramones and was from Detroit.
It's not even particularly innovative for the mid 70's. There doesn't seem to be much progress from, say, The Stooges, and years people seem to forget that many punk bands already had similar songs who simply weren't released in album yet. It's not like the major punk bands only started composing/playing in 77.
Television for example were probably already NY legends when these Death songs were recorded.
>>61642483
speaking of proto songs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_FzWHxljYQ
>>61642432
I'm not defending them dude, I was just trying to explain a little of both sides to the argument as op had asked.
I think its garbage, and the adicts did the same sound as the stooges and death and the dolls better than any of them only slightly after each of those bands, but who gives a fuck what i think
>>61642492
see
>>61642517
you motherfuckers are misinterpreting what i've said ffs.
>>61642517
>but who gives a fuck what i think
I do, just making sure we were on the same page.
>>61642360
>>61642488
That's impossible since it was only released in 2009. Maybe you are thinking of another album?
>>61642709
Yeah, some shitty five track bootleg casette. It's more or less the same shit, though. Couple of tracks less.