>>61636521 Bowie didn't do it, it would have been Sony, that most definitely did pay for it. I'm friends with the dude from Rhye, he told me his record label paid pitchfork for the BNM and he didn't really give a shit about that album or anything haha
>>61636824 this. also sometimes pitchfork gives BNMs to bands that they already generally like. They totally base their reviews on Pitchfork's meta opinion, rather than that of the reviewer. At least most of the time, every now and again there's a genuine thing being written. But anyway... >2016 >using pitchfork for anything other than the news section
Thread replies: 15 Thread images: 2
Thread DB ID: 410354
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.