Technics 1200 are back ! 4k MSRP !

is that the price for the limited edition, or the normal version?

>>61586854
limited ed will cost 100 or 200 more than regular , so yes , regular ed will cost 3800-4k

>>61586894
that's unbelievable

what exactly is that much better about it than the AT LP 120

>>61586894
there will be 1,200 of the limited edition which will run 4k. The normal run without the "limited edition" sticker will be like ~$500

>>61587721
It's like comparing a monkey model tank to a first world composite armor, high power engine and laser guided targeting system model

>>61587737
sauce?

all the major dj sites are saying they will be 3.5- 4 k a pop

>>61587737
http://djtechtools.com/2016/01/07/new-technics-sl-1200ggae-will-cost-4000/

>>61587831
yeah alright that's not really an answer

what is it? the durability? cause the 120 can play records fine without breaking them and seems to have the same functions

>>61587938
Except it is an answer. Research yourself, idiot. The lp120 is a cheap monkey model and is incomparable in sound reproduction accuracy and usefulness to a professional dj as the technics 1200 series.

>>61588032
it's a meme answer
revert from using analogies whenever you can (pro tip: that's always)

>>61587865
having trouble believing that.

if it's true, i don't understand why they even brought it back. no one is paying 4k for a turntable. or rather, i don't see how they sell more than a thousand/year globally.

>>61588141
Analogies are not memes, but you are stupid. It is quite accurate to describe the lp120 as a monkey model. No one should ask such a ignorant question when there is a plethora of information available at their finger tips.

4k is such a stupid price

they used to retail at 500-800

this has gotta be a shill, there's been multiple threads with the same "technics 1200s are back!!" subject every time

fuck off

>>61588279
your answer was literally "120 is bad, 1200 is better", no reasoning, and with an unnecessary comparison
it's a fucking meme answer and you know it. stop using analogies, and tell this to every other american as well who all have a fucking hard on for them

>>61588335
I don't see why either. There's no way they threw out the manufacturing equipment. It seems they're going after audiophiles instead of professional users

File: 1451725196074.png (151KB, 455x370px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 455x370px

>>61588456
So salty. As I said, the information and history of both models is available at your fingertips as well as user impressions and research of model specification claims. Sorry that your willful ignorance is holding you back

>>61588572
You're right, it was dumb of me to ask /mu/ instead of looking it up.
You should still try to give better answers though, if you're already taking the time.