new radiohead any day now... bring on the hype >Radiohe

>>61558857
I saw this and got hype too op, we're definitely in the home stretch

I know they'll probably just drop it out of nowhere, but I'd really prefer if they gave at least a couple days warning so I can bask in the hype relistening to their discography

>>61558857
oh boy
oh man

>>61558902

they won't release it without warning

>>61558902
definitely its all part of the album rollout including the Spectre track

>>61559480
yeah I can totally see spectre being framed as the nice christmas teaser before the big storm

fuck i'm excited, its been 5 fucking years since tkol

>>61559697

a shit album. Just like everything Thom has been involved in for a decade.

It will suck. In Rainbows was their last good album.

fuck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!sign me up nigga

>>61559820

In Rainbows wasn't especially good.

>>61559859
kek

Why do they need to establish a new company all over again, tho?

>Dawn Chorus LLP
Good taste in BoC tracks, I see

>>61559907
tax and easier to split royalties

>>61559940
lets all hope that the new album will have lots of female orgasm sounds ;)

>>61559719
lol

album is dropping tomorrow

cap this

>>61559859
It was. Oh it was

>>61560700
Just feels sort of half-baked and tentative, I liked TKOL more

>>61560719
nah in rainbows is the best radiohead record

>>61560748
Their worst since Pablo Honey, yeah. I said it.

File: 1411544007095.jpg (59KB, 380x380px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 380x380px

>>61560793

>>61560793
I don't get it? There isn't a bad song on it. It's a solid 9/10 for me. The sounds they fucked around with, although they weren't as out there as Kid A and the likes, they were still sonically exploratory.

>>61560793
(not true, by the way)

>Dawn Chorus
Collab with BoC confirmed!

>>61558857
>CoS
Meh

>>61561066
NME also posted the same

>>61561066
yeah, they have a tendency to publish stuff before it's confirmed and sensationalize headines. they've even done it with radiohead on this very cycle.

File: Screen Shot 2016-01-07 at 4.41.19 PM.png (265KB, 1051x205px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1051x205px

>>61559940
>>61559964
>>61561033

a dawn chorus is an actual thing tho, it's what you call the first bird calls of the morning. "Bloom" was probably called "Dawn Chorus" at first, they were working on a song with that title as of 2009 and Bloom is full of birdsong. it's not a BoC reference.

>>61561163
DISAPPOINTING

>>61560793
>what is hail to the thief
almost right tho desu

>>61561066
you want a pfk link instead, faggot?

http://pitchfork.com/news/62787-radiohead-form-new-company-raising-speculation-new-album-is-imminent/

its shitty speculation who cares who posts it

New radiohead album made of ambient music or something similar to bodysong with thom just quietly singing gibberish no more than three songs.

There. I fixed radiohead guys.

>>61561474
this would actually make a cool 1 or 2 tracks but Radiohead is an only slightly experimental band

>>61559719
The King of Limbs is their third best album after Amnesiac and Kid A

>>61559820
In Rainbows was not that good

>>61561188
Hail to the Thief was awesome, how you even dare to compare it with Pablo Honey (a really crappy album)

>>61561654
do people just not like OK Computer? I mean I love amnesiac but OK Computer was definitely my favorite album

>>61561654
Nah, I just changed the other anon's statement from "[In Rainbows was] their worst since Pablo Honey" to have HTTT instead, it's still leagues better than Pablo Honey
That being said their entire rock discography is well executed but also really bland to me, what they should be commended for is their work in merging IDM stylings with pop rock almost flawlessly and also the influence of OK Computer

>>61561720
it's rock music, which is embarrassing now

there'll be a shit back in its favor in a few years, but i'm pretty sure most casual RH fans are still the guys yelling "HIGH AND DRY" at concerts. OKC is like the invisible gap way in their discography between rockism and bleep bloop

>>61561768
>That being said their entire rock discography is well executed but also really bland to me
this, I mean it's good music and I could understand why someone would like it, but it just feels kind of safe. I do love Kid A and Amnesiac though

>>61561720
too mainstream-rockish for us, we need edgy and experimental music

>>61558857
What will the name for the new album be?

Take a quess

>>61561844
fuck you Montie

>>61561720
I love OK Computer

>>61561784
I love Radiohead, really much, I listen at least two albums of the band twice a day. But Pablo Honey and The Bends are utter trash

>>61561844
Further Down

>>61561892
The Bends isn't utter trash, it's just so fucking boring with the exception of like 2 or 3 songs, same with Pablo Honey but even worse

>>61561844
i'm feeling something orientalist, maybe a Japanese or Bengali word

>>61559820
TKOL studio version sucks, but the material really shines live. I prefer the Live From The Basement version.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DvM4GObIN4

>>61561844
Cadence

>>61562482
the live from the basement vids are so awesome

is this where they practice? is this one of their houses?

>>61562654
It's from a show that Nigel runs where musicians perform live in an intimate setting. Only some of the songs get on the show but Radiohead releases all of the stuff recorded as albums

>>61562654
dude, that's BBC Maida Vale Studios lol. Do you really one of them has something as huge as that in their house? With all this equipment?

>>61562719
I mean it IS possible to have a bunch of studio equipment in a residence, TKOL was recorded at Drew Barrymore's house.

a control room would be rarer in a home, tho

File: wilco.png (674KB, 1111x400px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 1111x400px

>>61562719
i mean, it's radiohead why wouldn't they just have a huge place like that

have you seen wilco's loft in chicago?

>>61562825
>I mean it IS possible to have a bunch of studio equipment in a residence
Kinda goes without saying. You could fit a mic and a 4-track in a pizza box if you wanted to.

>>61562869
>have you seen wilco's loft in chicago?
no