[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Home]
4Archive logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohRsn3BXaNw
If images are not shown try to refresh the page. If you like this website, please disable any AdBlock software!

You are currently reading a thread in /mu/ - Music

Thread replies: 64
Thread images: 5
File: pitchfork.jpg (108 KB, 659x646) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
pitchfork.jpg
108 KB, 659x646
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohRsn3BXaNw


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCUc3Kbphr4
>>
did she make that song on her first time using fl studio or something
>>
>caring what pitchfork says about your favorite album
i seriously hope you guys don't do this
>>
that first one has to be a joke... right? that's like a joke cover of the song? Please let it be an ironic cover
>>
>pitchfork is full of hacks
wow who knew
>>
>>50913495
>>50913517

It has got to be something like this...it so bad.
>>
File: cory real.jpg (15 KB, 281x350) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
cory real.jpg
15 KB, 281x350
>that planningtorock song

my sides were not ready.

i feel like one of two things happened here:

1. the pitchfork reviewer thought the music was 2deep2doubt so she gave it a good review just to be safe and not look like a pleb

2. the music was terrible but muh feminism
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9MU0mXrzW0

ratings and comments disabled lol
>>
if i dislike planningtorock does that make me a misogynist? Keep in mind I am a straight white male.
>>
>>50913625
according to tumblr, maybe.
according to sensible human beings, of course not she's fucking shit at making music
>>
i have honestly never heard worse music than Planningtorock in my entire life. I've heard 12 year old kids make shitty local metal music and I've seen all those performances we post in cringe threads but this shit takes the cake.
>>
>>50913677
You sound like the extreme opposite of the very thing you're trying to dis.

But in response to >>50913625 I don't like planningtorock, I'm just pointing out an extremist reaction is as bad as many.
>>
>>50913454
planningtorock is satire you fucking idiots
also mgmt didn't even deserve 6.8, it's 4.4 at best
>>
>>50913625
>straight white male
You're already a mysoginist, your opinions don't matter
>>
>>50913780
>You sound like the extreme opposite of the very thing you're trying to dis.

what do you mean?
>>
>>50913852
>blah blah Tumblr, nobody there is sensible, she's fucking shit at making music
That's basically what I'm referring to.
>>
>>50913798
>planningtorock is satire you fucking idiots
Satire on what? Elaborate, if you can.
>>
>>50913947
The Knife

still
>it's not bad because it's MEANT to be bad
>>
>>50913880
I'll admit that the tumblr thing was an unfair generalization, but I'm going to be honest. This is some of the worst music I've ever heard.
>>
>>50913798
But why would someone make something bad on purpose when the message of the music is obviously meant to be so strong? If she actually cared about the message she wouldn't make a joke out of the music.
>>
>>50914003
hipster faggots are just saying its ironic so they can seem cool

truth is its just really, really bad
>>
>>50913988
That's a fairer and more emotionally divided assertion.

>>50913987
It's a satire on The Knife? I haven't read or heard any such thing.
>>
>>50914003
it's not strong, it's making fun of sjw culture
>>
First one reminds me of the Residents.

Also see a tiny bit of Shaggs and Smash Mouth's All Star.

It's kinda my jam as a matter of fact, ty op for reccing this!
>>
>>50913495
>>50913565
>your DAW makes your music sound bad
Babby's first troll.
>>
p4k won't review anything lower than 7 unless it's to shame a band that they previously gave a high score to.
>>
>>50914187
Do you actually believe this or are you being a sarcastic butt?
>>
>>50914231
I actually believe that.
>>
>>50914003
see lil b
>>
>>50914252
Well that's dumb. The new Field Report album that came out just yesterday did not receive a 7 or higher and they have never received a 7 or higher.
>>
>>50914307
>album that came out just yesterday
I mean that the review was posted up yesterday, my bad.

Also, Kiesza's new album got a mediocre score and has never had another album of hers rated by them.
>>
I don't even like MGMT that much Congratulations getting a 6.8 is pretty stupid considering their other scores
>>
File: 1414249808755.png (12 KB, 468x425) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1414249808755.png
12 KB, 468x425
Wow. This group is so bad, what the fuck is going on here?
>>
>>50914307
It's not precise—more of a rule of thumb. The 6.6-7 zone is the biggest non-commitment of a rating possible. It's almost like saying "no comment." It's nothing special but they won't or can't give it any real criticism. Nobody gets offended. They give a majority of reviews a score inside that range.
>>
>>50913510
>caring what anyone says about your favorite album
>>
>>50913454
I'm actually laughing so hard holy shit I love this song
>>
File: BzcGkMSCMAADv8W.png (266 KB, 500x375) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
BzcGkMSCMAADv8W.png
266 KB, 500x375
>>50913798
>>50913798

Planningtorock is NOT satire on The Knife. She literally made an album WITH The Knife called "Tomorrow, In a Year".
>>
>>50914521
I'm aware. And she's mocking them with her new record.
>>
>>50914474
Well Pitchfork is somewhat inconsistent between their ratings and what they actually have to SAY about the albums they're reviewing, I'll definitely give you that. But I have seen quite a few reviewers appropriately talk positively and have actual things to say about a 7/10 album. The new DFA1979 album is an example of this. But yeah, a 7/10 seems to be like a 5/10 for a lot of the reviewers there.
>>
i like that planningtorock song.
>>
>>50913454
if a man reviewed the p2r album it would have gotten panned
>>
>>50914550
Do you have anything resembling a citation for this? I asked a while ago with no responses.
>>
>>50914846
>actually not knowing how Pitchfork determines scores
No, it wouldn't have.
>>
>>50914698
Is this like white peopes hiphop?
>>
>>50914120
>your bad sound makes your music sound worse
Ya, that pretty much sums it up
>>
neither of those albums deserve anything above a 5/10
>>
>>50915078
I definitely agree with this at least.
>>
>>50915007
Nah, that's Death Grips.
>>
#p4kgate
>>
Let's talk about gender baby
let's talk about you and me

Do what you feel now
electric feel now
>>
>>50914857
Of course he doesn't. He just needs to validate his enjoyment of planningtorock whilst being a white male
>>
>>50915347
Nah, I'm just taking the piss
>>
>>50915373
>taking the piss
I completely and totally forgive you just because you use this phrase and I love this phrase.
>>
>>50915233
Them and like Logic, Immortal Technique, DOOM, eminem, basically the good rappers
>>
>>50913454
Holy shit what the fuck was she thinking

It sounds so all over the place, her voice is piercing and it just sounds messy.
>>
>>50913454
>relying on p4k to give anything the right rating
>>
Planningtorock is pretty fascinating in a way, the music is pretty much an exact representation of what The Knife would have sounded like if Karin and Olof suffered from severe mental retardation.
>>
The pitchfork circle jerk is cancer on this board
>>
Who cares, why don't you just listen to what you enjoy and not let others influence you
>>
>>50915670
Because that is literally impossible and you do it all the time because everybody does it all the time. People who talk shit about 'outside influence' are the people most unaware of the fact that they are being influenced from outside sources.
>>
>>50915078
This. Congratulations is a 5.5/10 at a big stretch.
>>
>>50915713
then at least be influenced by a reliable source and not kids wiping their ass and saying the shit stained toilet paper is journalism
>>
>>50915732
Siberian Breaks might push it up to a 5.5, but it's a 5 for me right now
>>
>>50915745
That would be a fair point if you weren't so callously dismissive of an entire publication of writers and music journalists. P4k is hardly my favorite music publication, but they're hardly a bunch of 'kids wiping their ass and saying this stained toiler paper is journalism'. There are genuinely good writers at Pitchfork, people who conduct excellent interviews, and although Ryan Schreiber can't write to save his life (and isn't the best editor) the central idea of Pitchfork is a good one.
Thread replies: 64
Thread images: 5
Thread DB ID: 18314



[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vip /vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at [email protected] with the post's information.