jpop>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>kpop
Prove me wrong
What's some patrician Jpop
>>72721005
No shit. K-pop is just Western music with Korean "singers".
>>72721029
Perfume and Kyary are far and away the most interesting.
What does /mu/ think of PWR BTTM?
I feel irritated that I'm now forced to be aware of this band's existence. It really gets on my nerves when shit like that happens, when these sorts of things force their way into your consciousness.
I don't give a fuck about these people. I hope I'm going to forget they ever existed by this time tomorrow. Fuck them and fuck you.
>>72721003
They annoy me
What does PWR BTTM stand for?
Can we finally just admit that there's nothing to music criticism or analysis other than "I like these sounds" or "I don't like these sounds"? Even if a review pads it out with other things, it always just comes down to just that.
>>72720960
I guess but the descriptions make it worth reading/listening/watching.
ye but the review is why the reviewer likes or does not like the sounds
>>72720992
>I guess but the descriptions make it worth reading/listening/watching.
That might be helpful if it was like, the 90s and you couldn't just listen to albums on the internet and hear for yourself, but it's not the 90s anymore.
>closing track
>artists walks out of room at the end of song
>>72720938
>closing track
>vocalist gasping for air.
>>72720938
Fleet Foxes' Crack-Up?
yep, that was fucking stupid
>>72721026
ITAOTS-2-Headed boy pt2
Post your pick for greatest album of all time
(Pic very related)
>>72720909
Is that a giant demon behind distant mountains? Because that would mean the links in the chain gradually get fucking tremendous as you move further back from the priest to the demon.
Or is that a regular sized demon standing behind a tiny rock outcropping, and basically four feet back from the water?
Now that this album cover has me questioning what my own eyes are perceiving, I'm ready to escalate up to questioning organized religion. Dio does it again!
who the fuck is hiro
>>72720924
the owner of 4chan
>>72720908
/mu/ is great dont change shit i like it here
OP is a fag
It's great, 9/10
>>72720651
agreed, although I would say it bridges on being bad.
>>72720662
>>72720667
pathetic
let's see what /mu/'s been listening to
be sure to r8 and rec
>>72720545
Hello
++Ween
I never understood this "++, -" thing on these threads. Fuck off I don't want validation from strangers I just want recs
I never understood this "recs / spoonfeeding" thing on these threads. Fuck off I don't want recs from strangers I just want to chat music
one of these
template
>>72720457
>Streethawk
>Pleb
>>72720520
pleb
what's the consensus?
Remake of ITCOTCK
ITCOTCK doesn't hold a candle to Lizards
CAT FOOD
Triple H is good
why
why does anybody like this
>>72720326
It's a novelty
Worth listening to but not something I'd probably ever listen to again
>>72720326
>>72720326
his early stuff is really rough, but there are gems in them. If you want full albums that are more listenable, check out his early 90s stuff like 1990 and Artistic Vice
Thoughts on this Pajeet?
He's Mexican bro
If being racist, at least be accurately racist. Doesn't help the whole low IQ - racist stereotype.
Dude is mexican.
Music is okay tier 2012-chillwave
He needs to release an album already. Night school a solid 9/10
What do you think of the new National song?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O6duDDkhis
>>72720185
>new national album
my trash bin is rubbing its hands like birdman waiting for this album mate
>>72720192
This new song isn't bad though
>>72720185
i'm not a fan of the drums, they're usually one of my favourite components of a national song along with matt's voice
it's a little more upbeat than their last album
overall it's fine, but it hasn't grabbed my attention and i'm quite a big fan
Albums you waited way too long to listen to.
p good
london calling
mount eerie