Where are you supposed to buy this shit from? I want to get a couple really edgy powerviolence/grind etc shirt but I don't know where to look. Also, writing on the back is too cheesy.
at their shows
>>72970272
ye, this
>>72970272
That would be helpful if I didn't live in the middle of nowhere!
Name a better 1970 to 1990 metal album.
sin after sin, stained class, screaming for vengeance, defenders of the faith, painkiller
that enough?
Master of Reality
>>72969883
>screaming for vengeance, defenders of the faith
How about no? Fun albums but still inferior pop-priest nonetheless.
>post an image
>others recommend an album based on the image
>>72969660
holy shit, this is the best prog album ever made. fucking insane
What are you on acid
>>72969563
You forgot to add
>t. someone who's never listened to prog
>>72969563
Its really good, but not even close to the
best
Give me a reason why this isn't the best rap album after 2000
danny brown exists
Because this exists .
>>72969562
Many comparable hip-hop albums have been released since then. Atrocity Exhibition, Fischale, The Money Store, and Deltron 3030 have all been released since 2000, and that's just a mere handful of contenders.
>*listens to velvet underground and beatles once*
>dude flowers and peace lmao
Is there anything more obnoxious than this pseudo-psychedelic wannabe 60s pop music?
velvet was more like hookers and heroine than love and peace, just sayin
>>72969454
ok but have you heard any other albums of theirs? star power? hang?
>>72970223
Yes I have. Hang is even worse. Some of the worst songs I've heard this year. Someone over there thinks he's Brian Wilson.
lets make an album about the recent terrorist attack! we can't let them win!
dd = track title
ttt = album and artist names
Manchester United
>>72969305
what is this pic saying op? people make those eye gestures when thinking about those things?
Hammurabi's Chode
alri
CHEE
what are the chances that in the next 10 years someone will surpass grimes? will ever be another grimes?
did grimes give 4chan mods sexual favors?
>>72969204
>what are the chances that in the next 10 years someone will surpass grimes?
0 because she's only getting bigger, how can compete?
>will ever be another grimes?
I've been trying to summon a tulpa of her for months but so far unsuccessfully.
>>72969220
Delet
what a waste of fucking time this bitch is
None of these I do now, but I used to
>The Birthday Party and The Wedding Present
>Guns 'n' Roses and The Stone Roses
>The Cure and The Cult
>Pink Floyd
>Led Zeppelin
Jesus and mary chain
Alice in chains
My Bloody For My Valentine.
what was their deal?
>>72968958
heroin is a hell of a drug
>>72968958
Degeneracy
heroin
Apparently /mu/ thinks this garbage is good
>>72968933
The first two songs are really good. Can't get much further for some reason.
Explain yourself.
>>72968974
It's basically a weak version of UP
Why is music always so symmetrical? We have so much stereo field we can use, but people rarely take advantage of that.
Lou Reed did some binaural recordings back in the day, but they really haven't stuck as industry practice. I get that when mixing, bass/sub-bass is simpler if it's in mono, and according to dance music conventions, the kick and the snare have to be in the middle. Even if we accept that, people could do all sorts of other things in the stereo field, yet I feel like it's kind of rare.
If you swapped the left and right channels, it wouldn't feel like the song changed all that much, for example. I mean, the Beatles did some terrible stereo mixes, where vocals are hardpanned and stuff, but you could do a good job with mixing, where things in your left ear are very different from things in your right ear, I think? It seems so artistically obvious, why do people not do this? It's as if every painting had to be symmetrical down the middle, or something. I don't get it.
Switch your player to mono and you'll see the difference with almost every song you have
>>72968925
audio engineers put a lot of time into making you not notice what they've done to make a song sound great.
when you become really aware of stereo it detracts from the songs - unless you're doing it for effects like melt banana or two tracks like velvet underground.
>>72968925
>I mean, the Beatles did some terrible stereo mixes, where vocals are hardpanned and stuff, but you could do a good job with mixing, where things in your left ear are very different from things in your right ear, I think?
Glad you brought the Beatles stereo mixes up, because it really shows that hardpanning a pop that isn't build to be hardpanned doesn't work. Most bands compose works that will be preformed live, so music made to be selectively panned left and right wouldn't work (at least not as well) live. Still though, it's an exciting territory
what are good gabber albums?
blurryface
Death grips
>gabber
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5_iQGNu0G0
>want to be a musician
>everything you write is shit
oh its this thread again okay i will contribute first
https://colourfulspite.bandcamp.com/releases
heres my stuff what do you guys think?
>want to be an expert programmer
>can't finish anything
>>72968882
you would make a great composer for horror movies