Archived threads in /mu/ - Music - 1688. page

FUCK OFF DUMB FROGPOSTER!!!

>>74389442
>Get a new book
>tear out all the chapters I don't like.
>Add in other text
That's how stupid you sound

>>74390326
Doesn't sound like a bad idea desu.

>>74390326
>>74390397
i would do that

i'd also edit scenes out that i don't enjoy from the movies, but rendering video's a bitch

she's a gross attention whore rat

>>74389485
rude

>>74389533
I apologize. I am sorry for my candor but I will not mince my words.

http://thisendlessbreath.blogspot.com/
http://sophiesfloorboard.blogspot.com/

File: theaterscenes.jpg (76KB, 475x475px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 475x475px

No, this one is.

>released 11th of September 2001

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Clear_Channel_memorandum

>>74389603
pleb taste desu

>>74389327
> deleting his favourite albums because someone on /mu/ said it sucked
nobody does this

>>74389308
That's the Mandela Effect for you, such an album doesn't exist

File: AE2EA057-16E9-404D-8718-4DBDDA226D09-30733-00002409E55DC923.jpg (9KB, 225x200px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 225x200px

>>74389308
Try this

>>74389367
thanks brother! that's it. my hdd with my local files bit the dust and I knew that album wasn't on spotify.

>>74389290
Damn, good point anon

Pack it up boys, DJing is over

>>74389328
innit, if only someone suggested this 30 years ago

Honestly yeah you can, it's just that DJs will try to deny it.

>>74389247
>top charts there only represent a tiny handful of artists.
durr I wonder why

Ravi Shankar is the West's bridge to India. Assuming your interest is aesthetic (probable), you would do just fine listening to much of his output before branching out to Ali Akhbar Khan, Ghazal, Pran Nath, etc. If your interest is more academic (unlikely) there is a wealth of compilation / trad music anthro recordings you can look up.
http://www.allmusic.com/style/indian-classical-ma0000002638/albums

All Qawwali is garbage btw

>>74389530
the handful of artists thing happens for basically every genre on RYM that pitchfork doesn't review. pretty quickly it becomes more of a barrier to discovery than a help.

do you think he's a good bridge? I'm really enjoying what i've heard so far. is it kind of like a john coltrane thing where everyone approaches jazz through him but he happens to be really fucking good?

if by "aesthetic" you mean i want to find albums for recreational listening then yes, though knowledge of the anthro side can enhance the aesthetic side too. don't find myself putting on e.g. smithsonian folkways recordings too often though. and thanks, i wrote down those 3.

>>74389247
>>74389530
>>74389681
to expand on "durr I wonder why" because it actually is an important point

the guru-shishya system was integral to indian "classical" for much of its history and has only recently expanded- one master teaching one pupil at a time until the pupil becomes a master and takes on a protege of their own

this has limited the scope of indian classical due to proliferation being a fairly recent phenomenon

I'd actually recommend reading the wikipedia page and maybe a PDF or two if you're interested

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindustani_classical_music

>do you think he's a good bridge?
yes, but he's not the Lord and Savior or anything. he touches most of the bases and it's pretty easy to listen to album after album without getting bored

>s it kind of like a john coltrane thing where everyone approaches jazz through him but he happens to be really fucking good?
I guess, but Indian music in general is still "exotic" to the west which severely limits exposure- Ravi played a massive part in spreading this music to the West

you can also just search "hindustani classical music" on Google and a plethora of things pop up immediately

Yes, obviously. Morrissey is a musical prodigy.

wtf is that 2014 album desu

>>74389621
Japanese shoegaze.

Stop being a contrarian and just choose TPAB

>>74389133
Say what you will about The Epic, this guy and his band put on a good show.