Is this set /lit/ approved?

Fitzgerald is better desu

Lattimore for Homer.
Mandelbaum for Virgil.

>>7689020
nope.

Those 3 books are shit. We always say it.
Damn, boy! Don't you read the threads here???

>>7689021
Why is Fitzgerald better, I've heard his is very similar to Fagles'?

What about Alexander Pope? Are his translations recommended?

>>7689031
They’re quite different, but Fagles is fine; particularly so if you haven’t read Homer at all.

>>7689051

P R E T T Y
R
E
T
T
Y

P O E M
O
E
M

>>7689020
Looks very nice. I have that version the illiad. I'll probably buy the other two shortly after I finish the illiad.

What are some other /lit/-approved sets?

>>7689020
>wanting approve from ponces

>same autistic fag slanders fagles translation all the time

Deckled edges are fucking stupid.

They're fine though.

File: smug robben.png (300KB, 365x435px) Image search: [Google]

300KB, 365x435px

>Fagles
>Fag

>>7689964
That's clearly Corey Stoll, friend.

>>7689772
>cramp
>my
>style

fagles is shit

>>7689022
Seconding.