>-69-InteRloCkeD--ther-stACk-rn-AnumbeR-of-WAIs--srmph-ACCRetrng--6699- IA I eR- bUI IDI ng- -=6 6 6999-h�m l n g - -�nmUnUtUnUus-pAneRn-66669999-1 f-thel -CAn --I f-neCessARI - t heI -CAn-be-elAstl C-t!L vARIQus=DegRees--669699-(QR-( (0) )-66699699- so-IQng-As-IQU--CQuID-fllnD--the-twln------ the I -ARe-CUnsI sten t--CUm plement=sr s tems-- 666996669 999- -AnD- heteRUgeneUs=elemen ts -=CAn-be-ADDeD--tQ-them-666555222996668 8999699- (AlwAIs-mAklng-A-DlffeRenCe-( IQU-stlll-suRerQu
people actually read this geek?
I wonder what Land enunciates during sexual congress?
"Oh, Anna, your erotico-dexterousness is accelerating me towards a hyper-dynamic circuit of dedidactic pleasure-intensification and orgasmico-masculine sexual culmination!"
According to his Twitter they inherited his weirdness:
>Nine-year-old daughter, dinner time: "I'm the hungriest mammal at the table." (WTF?)
>tfw going to an accelerationist club night but everyone there is going to be left accelerationists
gnon help me
honestly when push comes to shove they'll just support their pop leftist candidate
most left accelerationists seem to use it as an excuse to buy luxury goods, to quote:
>Why political intellectuals, do you incline towards the proletariat? In commiseration for what? I realize that a proletarian would hate you, you have no hatred because you are bourgeois, privileged, smooth-skinned types, but also because you dare not say that the only important thing there is to say, that one can enjoy swallowing the shit of capital, its materials, its metal bars, its polystyrene, its books, its sausage pâtés, swallowing tonnes of it till you burst
Indeed, left-accelerationism misses accelerationism's entire teleology and eschatology; socialistic policies such as universal basic income are merely compensatory calls for counteracting acceleration (I am referencing Rorschach Romanov).
This audio-visual presentation by Rorschach Romanov elucidates my (and Land's) disdain towards left-accelerationism with erudite brilliancy:
I can't seem to connect the neo-reactionary Land with the techno-philosophy Land. From >>7679427
>Also the problem with Nick Land is that while he did turn to NRx his own brand of accelerationism is nothing like the catholic traditionalism of Moldbug or even a promethean libertarianism. Nick Land is a Deleuzian , so he sees any future humanism or traditionalism as pointless. His own brand of posthumanism is truly terrifying because it's not an augmentation to humanity but pure alien alterity whereby is all the doom of humanity. Think Terminator and Blade Runner and not iRobot.
was the going-crazy becoming bi-polar?
although I'm generally leftist I don't see much difference between a left and right accelerationism. leftist political thought provided the theoretic tools for accelerationism (Marx, Deleuze, etc) and its followers became afraid of what it said. Is Left-Nihilism a thing?
>I can't seem to connect the neo-reactionary Land with the techno-philosophy Land
they're one and the same
NRx (at least Land's brand of it) is not a fascist or white nationalist or traditionalist or alt-right movement (it's not even a movement), rather it is merely concerned with describing the world as it is and how it will be (instead of how it should be and how we're going to do it)
'neoreactionary' is a shitty term because very little reaction actually happens
Western apocalyptic falsity and european nihilism made possible by morons like camus and a certain calvanist taste for mortification. Call me atavistic if you want but neither waving to an imaginary crisis nor putting humanity at the center of the future seem to be to be worthwhile.