Why doesn't /lit/ talk about Hungarian literature? It's

Please describe the basic outline of Hungarian literature from the 19th century onward and name and describe some major figures so that I can go read some Hungarian literature then you Hungarian fuckface

Because Hungarian anons don't shill enough for it
I shill Borges every chance I have

>>7634373
http://theculturetrip.com/europe/hungary/articles/the-outsider-within-the-ten-best-hungarian-writers/

>>7634373
http://www.britannica.com/art/Hungarian-literature

The Jobbick manifesto is bretty good tbhfam

>>7634384
Well that was underwhelming. Satantango and other stuff.

>>7634394
>and other stuff.
What else do you want

File: look at this smug bastard.jpg (31KB, 472x709px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 472x709px

Significant lack of Kosztolanyi and Pilinszky here

>>7634384
It should have mentioned Deszo Kosztolanyi.
Kornel Esti is fucking great. Skylark is also great but Kornel Esti is a wonderful collection of stories.

>>7634433
I agree, I was surprised he wasn't on that list. Anna Edes was great too.

>>7634384

>No Banffy

Honestly though not a bad list. Banffy should be essential Hungarian literature.

>>7634376
Not that you need to. Boregs is a top five shilled writer on /lit/. Unless it's all you of course.

/lit talks about Lazslo Krasznahorkai pretty often.

>>7634676
;)

>>7634433
>>7634485
yeah kosztolanyi is fucking great, skylark is still my favourite but those two are real good too. i'd love to read more but it's hard to find english translations of the others