What's up with all the has for Atlas Shrugged? I'm planning on reading it sometime soon. Will it turn me into a rich capitalist swine?
Writing is pretty bad.
What being said, most of the hate it gets is due to this board being filled by Marxist leftcucks.
>>7605730
>Marxist leftcucks
Why are they ruining this board? They're essentially redditors.
It has fucking epic characters and writing dude. Pete don't like it here because they're fucking get cuckoos
Atlas Shrugged is horrible oversimplifications: the book. Other than that I enjoyed it though.
best critique ever
Because /lit/ is filled with Marxists and they want their gibsmedats.
They're afraid of the truth of capitalism; it works, and some people are better than others (this hurts their equality feels)
Basically they're like women or children, they don't know better.
Ayn Rand is based and redpill approved
>>7605823
Sure just got Reddit in here
>>7605721
>What's up with all the has for Atlas Shrugged?
this place is filled with cuckolds (i.e. mentally ill leftists)
>>7605823
while i'm most likely never reading ayn rand, this type of critique is absolute shite. it really doesn't say anything tangible about the book, and isn't even an inch above a similar juxtapository criticism of christianity and fairy tales
>>7605839
>while i'm most likely never reading ayn rand
liberal 'tolerance', everyone.
>>>/reddit/
>>7605823
>he actually has this photo saved onto his computer's hard drive
>>>/Reddit/
>>7605730
maybe in 2014 lmao
lotta false flagging going on itt either way
>>7605721
>Objectivists
>Rich
Pick one.
I know a looooot of people who call themselves Objectivists; they have all the books, go to all the meetings, "live their principles", etc.
One. ONE. Has a decent living, and that is because of a trust fund.
Most of the rest scrabble to get $30k a year and blame it on 'the moochers'.
>>7605853
>libcuck detected
Fuck off back to reddit. We own /lit/ now
FUCKING REDDIT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>7605721
As a writer, Ayn Rand was a mediocre novelist.
As a philosopher, she was a mediocre novelist.
The characters are tissue-thin and unrealistic; the dialog is terrible; the pacing is like watching a long-drawn out cricket game with no runs.
The premise is interesting.
There are some good set pieces and the semi-scifi setting is actually interesting.
I've noticed that a lot of successful people I know have either talked about reading this book or own it.
I'm a lefty and I really fucking hate Rand. She soooo problematic and racist. I also love immigration
>>7605721
>Will it turn me into a rich capitalist swine?
if you buy into her ideas through her terrible prose you will become an insufferable bore that posts "reditt" to every post you don't agree with
proving you are an insufferable bore
Does anyone else notice how neocons use Rand even though she hated religion and just sort of compartmentalize it away?
>>7605870
Fuck off to tumblr cuck
>>7605721
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sj9Gsq8zTZ0
>>7605872
somebody mad
>>7605876
Nice ad hominem.
>>7605876
>leftist """""""""""""banter"""""""""""""""
>>7605873
This is remarkably on-point.
>>7605877
flunks 9th grade algebra 3 times
now a master of logical fallacies
your talk radio/pol/ diploma is showing
somebody mad
>>7605873
pretty good and I think it explains a lot of the hate she gets from the left and how she goes unmentioned on the corporate right
I don't think she was particularly important though
>>7605898
That doesn't mean he can't be right once in a while.
>>7605887
FUCK OFF
>>7605901
>a leftist
>being right
>ever
Wow, this place really is turning into tumblr
>>7605901
BIG
BLACK
COCK
>>7605902
you mad, Fredo?
you're smart
The problem with Ayn Rand's philosophy is that it's dependent on egotistical delusion to exist. For something called 'objectivism' it's about the biggest blatantly false masturbatory fantasy of self-importance.
It really only appeals to the deeply insecure, afraid-of-failure types.
Also she was a bad writer.
>>7605916
>le marxist cuck critique
living with ur mom too, right?
>>7605916
nailed it, bro
As a story about about a kinda-scifi railway it sustains itself ok.
The writing isn't great. Many of the characters are straw-men with bad arguments. The philosophy is just … weak.
It is a very fast, easy read. The main story is 'OK' and will help you keep turning pages. All other aspects are sub-par.
>>7605916
How's it like being a basement dweller?
>>7605730
Why has America so warped the definition of liberalism to mean the polar opposite of it's intended meaning? It irks me that those fags have co-opted the word to fit their agenda, and bringing with it the shitty connotation that liberalism is bad. Get your shit together America, the rest of the world uses the word properly
>>7606894
>rustled libcuck detected
>>7606894
seriously how did this happen
>>7606894
It is not warped, it's practical.
>>7606894
Because they're still liberals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_liberalism
Does anyone else think the chapter in which the train gets destroyed, because everyone keeps passing on the responsibility to the next person, is amazingly well written? I think it was called "The Moratorium on Brains". But I was just in awe when reading that chapter
It'll turn you into a Marxist friendo.
>>7607518
Only in comparison to the rest of the book. The part about everyone dying for doing something wrong is actually a little terrifying, seeing as everything else in the book is basically an outlet for her views. The main characters lead to a lot of deaths among the general population, among people who weren't really 'bad', so to speak, just by doing what they were doing. It's kinda terrifying that she just sweeps that under the rug.
That being said, if you want to read it, I would recommend reading up on the history of the USSR. I really disliked Atlas Shrugged until I learnt about how crazy shit was back then. Now I just think it's a pretty stupid / overrated book.
>>7607523
>implying
>>7607499
both randroids and marxcucks serve the same parasite
>>7605721
Rand's philosophy aside, I hear she is a terrible, terrible writer. I have read only excerpts from Atlas Shrugged, and it may have been cherry-picked by critics, but if passages like those - which can be considered nothing but atrocities to aesthetics - can make it into her magnum opus, it does not bode well for the rest of it.
>>7609467
Literally who gives a fuck about how she writes, you libcuck. The only thing that matters is her philosophy, which you failed to address. Please go back to Reddit, you insufferable tool.
>muh everyone deserves to be equal
>muh Marxism
>muh rich people bad
>>7609476
>"who gives a fuck about how she writes"
>you're currently on /lit/
you're embarrassing yourself
>>7609532
>being a prosefag
Literally Reddit-tier
>>7609476
>literally who gives a fuck how she writes
>>7609476
Her philosophy is articulate sociopathy. Unnecessary. Redundant. Counterproductive.
>>7609579
you're so confounded by memes you can't even see reality anymore. take a break from online for a while. breathe in the air.
I don't think I've ever seen an Ayn Rand thread on /lit/ that wasn't shit-eating retarded.
>>7609874
Blame the libcucks
>>7609453
Sjws, yes. Marxists, no.
>>7609881
Fucking burger
>>7609874
I wonder what the cause of that could be
Hmmmm
Hmmm
Hmm
Hm
Hmm
Hmmm
Hmmmm
>>7605721
Don't let a bunch of neckbeards give you preconceived notions. Just read it faggot.
>>7612672
btw
The Fountainhead is better.