>>7590176 His sermons of the dead are fucking based if you like the mystical-psychological angle. You might need some familiarity with Gnosticism though just to get then details, since his writing is vivid enough either way
>>7590154 OP the fact is that Jung was a terrible fucking writer. Great ideas, zero writing ability. So #1 place to go is his pseudo-autobiography entitled Memories, Dreams, Reflections. It's sort of an autobio that was compiled out of hundreds of hours of interviews. The author them formed it into a book. It's pretty cool.
Other than that, yeah 7 sermons to the dead is super sique.
His commentaries on eastern philosophy are interesting in their own right, but Jung had no knowledge of any eastern traditions as such (he didn't know Sanskrit or Chinese), so his stuff has nothing to do with actual eastern philosophy.
J.J. Clarke's book, Jung and Eastern Thought, is excellent.
Honestly most people don't actually read Jung. There's so much secondary literature that's really good that slogging through his nonsensical prose is something best left to Jung scholars.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the shown content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content, then use the post's [Report] link! If a post is not removed within 24h contact me at email@example.com with the post's information.