thoughts on this? what publishers should be where, should we

>>7575515
Everyman in hit or miss. I generally stick to Oxford when I can get them.

Why do I give a fuck about publishers again?

Should be more like:

Academia tier:
Norton
Oxford
Loeb
Hackett

Obscure/patrician/hister tier:
NYRB
Hesperius
A few more I can't remember atm

In-between tier:
Everyman
Modern

Mass market tier:
Penguin
Viking

>>7575519
Some have better translators, introductions, notes, quality and aesthetic covers.

File: publishers list.png (12KB, 277x466px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 277x466px

I'm thinking something like this

>>7575560
everyman is more aesthetic than modern library and is also hard cover/nicer quality. some modern library have poor covers. notes are sometimes good sometimes totally useless.

File: publishers list.png (16KB, 392x466px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 392x466px

ok everymans staying on good and added a few more

Folio are gaudy trash

But really these sorts of lists are trash

If you take these charts seriously you're a sheepish pleb trash

>>7575627
thats why its in the fancy section not the good one.

>>7575671
But they're not fancy