Someone please post the most recent top-100 book list that was

>>7572240

*compiled

Lol wow! that ruined my childhood. xD

>>7572262
Truly an embarrassing list

File: Top100 2015.jpg (3MB, 1820x4348px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1820x4348px

>>7572240

>>7572265
This is the most recent and had the best methodology. To be honest it's better than any other top 100 I've seen on the net.

File: hqdefault.jpg (9KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 480x360px

>>7572265

this was it thank you my man

>>7572262

Stop propagating these fucking charts. One more imgur event and /lit/ is irreparably fucked.

>>7572273
>2 votes is enough to get a book onto the chart

it's literally a chart made by people who've read like 30 - 50 books in their lives, usually meme books, voting in whatever book they happened to actually read. it is so incredibly divorced from considerations of quality and perspective and taste.

>better than any other top 100

says basically nothing.

File: top1002015redone.jpg (3MB, 1820x4348px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1820x4348px

>>7572265
refrain from posting the incorrect chart

>>7572467
It's literally the same

>>7572552
no votes>votes

>>7572467
oh hey sweet A Scanner Darkly made it
fucking love that.

>>7572556
why? so you can try to disguise how pathetic the voting process + vote counts were?