Pale Fire by Vladimir Nabakov

Suck my balls.

>>7562371
why?

can you give a tldr of Boyds analysis for those of us who don't know it?

I just read it a couple months ago and I can barely give a good analysis. I mostly just took things at face value and believed the things Kinbote told me. Im sure it would take a second reading to start catching the more difficult references.

so far I have not read about any analysis's of the book. Should I taint my mind with others opinions or should I just think of it as I know it?

>>7562456
I would highly recommend reading up on some of them, there's really intresting thoughts in some and they really shine a new light on the book.

>>7562447
that's a shame, this is my second time reading it and I'm still really fascinated by it, finding some really funny stuff too. I feel like this is one of those books where reading it once just doesn't suffice.

>>7562473
can you give an example of things you are finding? I'm not sure of the types of things I should be looking for.

Not OP but you should all read https://www99.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/boydpf1.htm

and a lot of the other stuff on this site. Very insightful if you care about Nabokov/aren't a pseud shitposting on /lit/.