What edition of Moby Dick does /lit/ prefer?
>>9665560
Leather bound gold trim
Cost 30$
Still haven't read
>>9665565
This post is the fucking epitome of /lit/. It should be made into a fucking banner.
This one. The harsh orange spines and creamy covers of the old Penguin English Library editions take me back to when I was a kid picking them up for 25ยข at the library sale bin. It's also edited by Harold Beaver, and the same could be said of him as of the poor sub-sub: pocket-sized this may be, but of the 1015 pages of print 680 are taken up by the actual novel, and the rest are filled with every kind of encyclopedic, historical, contextual, hypothetical, fanciful and critical commentary to fill out 335 pages of tight-knit endnotes, making its shape closer to a Polaroid camera than a travel-friendly companion.
Other than that, anything edited by Hershel "Mr Melville" Parker or with the Northwestern Newberry seal of approval cannot steer you wrong. I really like the cover of the Library of America solo edition.
Post philosophers that oddly enough fit Jordan Peterson's definition of Marxism.
I'll start with le ''There are no facts.'' guy.
>Le there is no reality
Except Nietzsche is arguably Peterson's biggest influence. Shitty thread OP.
Who was the greatest 20th century American writer, and why was it J.D. Salinger?
I unironically think it's Fitzgerald. And I disliked Gatsby.
The reason it's J.D. Salinger is "A Perfect Day for Bananafish."
This story is god-tier.
>>9664636
>B.J. Salinger
That's not how you say Kurt Vonnegut though.
Why do people keep recommending this shit? It's cringey and awful.
>>9663286
Yep, absolute trash. Haven't seen it on lit a lot, thank god, mostly just reddit.
It's so bad that i actually enjoyed reading it
like when you read those screengrabs of neckbeards professing their love to women
I knew from the 5th word that I wouldn't like the book, then from the 2nd paragraph that I'd hate it, and by the end of the first page my hate boner demanded I read it all, which I did in one sitting. It is by far the worst book I've ever read. Every other book I've read seems like a much greater achievement now that I know how low the floor for what can be considered a publishable book really is. Also, I can now hastily disregard the opinions of anyone who liked this book, as I know without a doubt I can't trust them; it's the ultimate pleb detector.
>tfw Taoism might be the ultimate way to true happiness
go on...
Once you "get it", you are already happy.
I personally prefer Patanjali's Sutras, which has a similar vision but also tackles the "action vs. contemplation" duality of the Path.
>>9659976
Patanjalis prose sucks
Whats the closest thing we have to actual "tomes of forbidden knowledge"? This isn't /x/ retardation, I'm not looking for a necronomicon or some shit. I am just looking for books which are considered to be better left unread (whether due to social unacceptability, disturbing subject matter, classified knowledge, etc) and put away to be forgotten. The only thing that I can think of that is legitimately forbidden in all libraries is smut.
Industrial Society and Its future
>>9655475
Mien konf
>>9655475
classified government files
Are ye ready kids?
have any of these reading threads actually worked? the only two i remember were /swtg/ and the don quixote one, and both failed within two weeks
>>9650867
I've never participated in one but I remember the Count of Monte Cristo one being around a long time. I can't say if any have successfully finished
>>9650867
The first series of IJ threads went pretty well. The second series was all right as well, but less active.
i want to bring you with me into this swirling ocean of my thoughts and not have to voice them i want them to wash over you and into you and i want you to decide what you think of me after you know all that i am i want to be honest more honest than i could be i want you to want me for everything and if you canโt thats okay i understand but i want you to feel every dream memory and thought Iโve ever had before you decide
and then i want to see you
______ALTERNATE_____
diving into this ocean of thoughts voices turn off floodlights turn on as the simple truth of a person made whole is revealed
something that words can't reveal something impossibly huge yet fundamental a primal fear of an uncountable number not enough time in this world to count it all but itโs so simple itโs so small
>>9649919
>tfw no dandy looking girlfriend
>>9650016
>tfw no replicant gf
:[
bzzzz
He says "aye ye bastard, recite a lickle poem for me and i'll let you live, but if ye faulter or fail, be sure it'll be more than your maiden's knees on the floor covered in liquid forever more"
SO what poem do you recite and why?
>>9671555
baby's shoes .
>>9671572
Defeated by the first reply:(
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85FYtguoxEs
I'm starting a project where I will be uploading episodic pieces of this lecture series by David Milch, creator of Deadwood. Probably once a day.
I hope there are some here that will find them as valuable as I did.
>>9671348
General Deadwood shitposting will also be appreciated and let all who disagree suck cock by choice
anything give me the most basic things
look at the fucking charts
Alright fags, /hcg/ is back in all of it's glory!
pastebin: pastebin.com/TxS2UWtY#
website: http://www.penguin.com/static/pages/features/hungrycaterpillar/
No kikes edition
im doing a survey of the history of philosophy by date of birth and i just got into the 1900s with fromm, gadamer, heisenberg, popper, adorno, sartre and arendt.
im not that well versed in logic, nor that interested, and im wondering if i can skip goodman, godel, quine. i read a little of goodman (not aesthetics), and some quine and was honestly put to sleep. is there some shit i need to take away from them to continue on?
any philo bosses on here today?
PRO-TIP: You can't, there isn't one and there never will be, everyone should just stop trying
"the raven" isnt even the best poem about corvids, newfriend
>>9671248
the raven is the best poem about paranoia, most relatable, most accurate and this is why it's the most famous
>>9671291
>this is why it's the most famous
its the most famous as its on almost every high school English syllabus and has been for decades. for many Americans it will be the only poem they ever read closely.
same reason catcher in the rye holds the status it does.....because every second american is literally forced to read it.
Which books failed to be a good book but could potentially work as an enjoyable film?
The Martian gets my vote. Shitty book, enjoyable (but dumb) movie.
I think, although he's not bad or anything, but Philip K Dick's books would be better as films. His books are good but the ideas and events could be more interesting if they were depicted via a visual medium. I know there's plenty adaptations of his work so far (many considered popular classics, especially BladeRunner) but some of his lesser known works should be up for adaptation.
Man in the High Tower is shit as a book and shitter as a TV series though. That's some truly terrible SyFy channel-tier crap.
>>9671146
John Dies at the End was a dumb fun book but deserved to be a much better film.
Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time could be a big award winning film that'll make everybody """feel"""
I Am A Cat as a Studio Ghibli film is my dream.