>tfw wagecuckery inhibits me from pursuing my literary ambitions
Wat do, /lit/? I don't want to be a 9-to-5 monkey.
>>9734766
Write while you're at work and edit at home. That's what I do. I'm about as productive at work as my coworkers too, so it doesn't really interfere with anything.
>>9734766
Get money to survive through either begging or stealing. Be homeless.
Or move home to your parents or friends, where you don't have to pay rent, work all you can for a year and save everything, then take a few years off
Even Kafka only worked from 7 to 3
What program do you use for your writing, anon?
I just use libreoffice because I'm too cheap to pay for windows, "opensource" seems a vaguely good thing, like free range eggs and it has a password function.
Where's your image from, opie?
>>9734714
I hope you are using some kind of source control. Academics would love to have a meticulous insight over every little change you perform over your text
who wants to read my experimental short fiction
>>9734639
what is that vid?
>>9734767
I don't know where it originated. It's a damn good video, though.
>>9734639
yellow shirt guy is a monster
also yeah post it
What did he mean by this
>>9734626
>breakfast cereals
>in 16th century Spain
So, corn, oats, or wheat? What
is that really from cervantes? reads as if a retard wrote it
Gotta be John Green
Is anyone else suffering in the nihilistic void but unwilling to leave it? And feeling besieged on all sides by people who want to control your behaviour? I want to live according to my views but it is hard.
I see propaganda, cucked ideologies, humanity denying ideologies, self sacrificing cucks, snake oil salesmen, and plain old stupid people everywhere.
Personally I trust my intelligence and my intuitions and taste (and the intelligence underlying my taste) but simply trying to live according to this is like living on an island. I'm not going to pretend I am a happy le edgy loner. Great friends would be a big bonus. A society that doesn't consider me an idiot for not reading Tolstoy would be a bonus.
I want to be able to give up on reading a book after 10 pages due to boredom, a famous book such as war and peace or great expectations, and not feel guilty about the attacks by pseudo intellectuals who claim I should be enjoying it and finding "great insights" in it. I cave to the societal pressure even though they're all pseuds.
I want to be able to note the simple fact that women live lives on easy mode and not suffer from the huge amounts of propaganda saying the opposite. You can't even say this on 4chan.
I want to call the famous post modern magnum opuses fatuous, overwrought shit. I want to laugh at the deformed people who go in to publishing, the media, and humanities academia. I want to do all this without feeling like I'm under siege by the pseudo intellectuals (like a lot of lit).
>>9734607
Well, we're alike, but do you actually live a good life or are all these issues mainly a distraction from your own failure?
Don't listen to what "Pseudo Intellectuals" say about the insight you get from reading. It's clear you're an intelligent and conscious man and need not worry if you don't understand something or have trouble extrapolating an idea, that's natural. I hate to be cliche but learning truly is a process, devour these classic works on your own at the speed you so choose. Focus on the insights you get from reading on your own without caring what others say, half of them are merely spouting the ideas of others. Stick with it anon, we've all been there.
>>9734624
I live a barely acceptable life. If I live according to my tastes and my definition of integrity starting from tomorrow, I think I can be a success.
By barely acceptable I mean I exercise, have a respectable looking job and CV for someone my age and graduated from university. Not that I am impressed with myself (not being modest, but I can't be bothered going in to details). The 24/7 propaganda machine grinds me down.
In your best prose, write about the woman you love.
she thicc as fucc
I want the succ
the ass is phat
An angel who has lived for twelve revolutions around Sol. Sweet d-a-r-l-i-n-g, you bring fire to my groin.
So I've always wanted to get into philosophy but thanks to High School English. It often struck me as confusing and boring. What I wanted to know is what are some good books to start with?
>>9734518
Start with the Greeks. Presocratics, then Plato's complete works, then Aristotle. That's about a years worth of philosophy for you to contemplate. Make sure to read secondary sources and watch youtube lectures on each dialogue.
>>9734518
did Niet ever seduce and actual woman?
>>9734752
I'd advise ignoring this. Start with something more pop. I've linked what I think to be a good jumping off point.
https://www.amazon.com/Stone-Reader-Modern-Philosophy-Arguments/dp/1631490710
Thoughts on this, and the Cosmere in general? I read Edgedance today and I'm quite happy that I only have to wait a few months for the third book.
Check the catalog, and remember not to make a fantasy thread again outside the general
>>9734523
You have a general for an entire genre? Weird board.
>>9734530
Outer /lit doesn't like their pretentious circlejerk being interrupted by people who want to talk about genre fiction books. /sffg/ is actually a pretty active community and people generally like talking about books there, which makes it unique on this board. Also yes, plenty of people in /sffg/ have read Sanderson's works. You'll find haters and fans both.
Anyone else in love with the idea of reading books but don't actually read books or very rarely read books? I set my goal to be 20 books for this year and I only read 2 so far and one was just a novella.
GET OUT
I love being seen as someone who reads but I'd rather scroll down 4chan and watch yt videos lol
>>9734457
I usually get about 1 hour of reading in every day while sitting out in the sun. It's very nice.
Leave this board and never return if any of these apply to you:
>you read any form of genre fiction
>you barely know your classics
>you tend to believe that if you like a given work, it is justified on an artistic level
>you think everyone's opinion should be accepted and respected
>you speak a single language
>you read contemporary versions of Shakespeare or Milton
>you read for the plot
>you read for soley for entertainment
>you rarely read nonfiction
>you don't have a solid grounding in philosophy
>you don't have at least have some understanding of the Three Tragedians and Homer
>you have little to no understanding of literature outside of your cultural horizon
>you have little to no understanding of literature within your own cultural horizon
>you mostly read contemporary literature
>you believe 'the author is dead'
>you make your literary analysis proceed from ideology
>you think intricate prose is 'pretentious' and that the author 'should just get to the point'
>your rarely read poetry
>you think Rhythm and Rhyme is just useless rules and laws restricting creativity
>you have a hard time explaining why you like a given work
>you have a hard time forming structured and relevant literary criticism
>you tend to refuse to judge works for yourself, rather relying on the opinions of literary authorities
>you rarely read for more than one or two hours straight
What book are you reading?
Critique of Pure Reason
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
>>9734437
Why did originally OP chose this author?
Alright /lit/, this has been bothering me for a while. I've got a couple of sentences and I'm having trouble with the use of whom/whoever. Take a gander:
>"Whose shape would I take on?"
>"Whoever’s you wanted."
or
>"Whomever's you wanted."
What would be the proper usage here? Internet guides haven't helped much since the whoever/whomever is possessive.
>>9734433
I think it's whomever's but I'm not sure.
whomsoever's't
>>9734433
Judging by this
>http://www.grammarbook.com/grammar/whoever.asp
it should be whomever I think but personally I think both sound retarded and I'd just use "whichever".
Not my native language though.
why have all the pseudos dropped zizek for self-help peterson?
>>9734408
zizek's analysis was cool in the post-ideological years but he has no insight now that the culture wars have commenced
he is probably too old, out of touch and lives in a bubble
im genuinely interested in this. They're both entertaining charlatans with limited academic standing.
>>9734408
He reminds me of the mall Santa that molested me.
What does /lit/ think of Steppenwolf?
Generally the opinion on this board is that it's good, and one of Hesse's best works. It definitely has a main character that is most similar to the posters here, out of all his works, so that may influence it.
>>9734395
literally me
>>9734395
Hesse is kino-tier and it's a shame that while Steppenwolf is fantastic, and autists like to bitch about Siddhartha being an easy-to-read, vanilla eastern metaphysical Roman with fantastic prose, his other works like Peter Camenzind, Glass Bead Game, or Narcissus and Goldmund get a fraction of the attention those other two get.
Have you goys seen this nasty ass prose? Could there possibly be anything denser?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01MURDLPW
humanity has gone too far
>>9734214
Is this computer generated? And you're right about it being dense, took me 3-4 minutes to read the first paragraph
>Literature, that "highest and most spiritual art", reaches new heights with this procedurally generated tour-de-force. Explore Dublin, the Galaxy, and Hell with Stephen and the crew of the Heart Of Gold as the combined consciousness of two of the "greatest authors" of the twentieth century has a stroke.
Holy shit
Hi over there. I would like to start reading Dostoievski but I really don't know where to start so I'd be thakfull if you could recommend me some book.
>>9734142
Start with The Idiot
>>9734142
Notes from the Underground is entry-tier, probably right up your alley if you're on 4chan, and it'll teach you that the author wasn't really what he's written up to be but just a neurotic creep who taught but couldn't do.
Demons is pretty good, but I would start with Notes or something small like that. You picked a good author friend.