>>9736174
I'm not a huge fan of him, but no he's actually one of the greats of the 20th century.
no he doesn't
one of the most important literary stylists and artists in general from the last century
probably a bigger influence on literature over the past 50-60 years than Joyce
any other expertly-crafted-but-unpleasant-to-read-prose like this out there?
Men like you turn my stomach
you might like Martin Amis
Maybe try the My Struggle series by Karl Ove Knausgaard
>>9736165
any other authors who shortchange themselves artistically to convince themselves of their average guyness making every avg guy in the process their idol for being the smartest sounding avg but not rly avg guy?
what the quickest you've ever trashed a book and for what reason?
Less than Zero by Bret Easton Phallis because he is a 9-gag tier edgelord.
Purchased a translation for La vida es suẽno because my Spanish is not that good and right there on the third line I realize it's not an actual translation but a loose adaptation of the text for playing to modern audiences. Hurt my hand wrenching the book out of anger.
>>9736045
have you ever even gone on 9gag or are you just repeating what you saw on your computer screen
*blocks your path*
I don't understand the people who say Tom Bombadil makes no sense. The more you think about him, and the more you learn about what Tolkien was getting at, the more sense he makes. He's kind of the "tell" of the story, the idea that there are forces in the world even more powerful than the big, bad dark lord, and they're not evil at all.
Originally Tom Bombadil and farmer Maggot were going to be related. And farmer maggot would have been just some god hiding his power level in the shire not doing anything just because.
>>9735958
Tom is strong but i dont think hes stronger than sauron.
I'm well aware that a little elitism is healthy for a literature board, but most of you seem unhinged desu
>>9735864
We don't want to end up like /mu/
Being unhinged is the beginning of wisdom
The boards for literature, not books/reading general
This weird thing happened the other day where I was sitting alone at a coffee shop and some guy came up to me and said hey you have stinky pussy, which I thought was weird cause I wash pretty much every day, except for the days where I don't like living, which is admittedly kind of often, like two or three times a week or so, but I'd washed that day and I also don't have a pussy, so the whole situation caught me off guard and made me first wonder if the guy was drunk or high or retarded or whatever, but he looked at me like I was supposed to answer him, like I was supposed to give him an excuse or justification for the stank of my pussy, and when I didn't say anything for a few seconds he just kept looking at me, he didn't even blink or anything, and so I tried a couple things, first I just tried staring into my book or computer or whatever and when that didn't work, which I knew cause I could see him in my periphery, stand-still as always, I went with my second option which was to double-down and stare back, but that was super uncomfortable and weird, so eventually I started with third, which was to take him seriously and answer with some vague sentiment like hey sorry I didn't mean to disturb you but I don't really have a pussy, and he said oh okay sorry and walked off.
Do you ever feel like some people have more insight into the world than you do? The whole "children/retards are actually more in-tune with the inertia of the universe than the rest of us" thing?
Autists grasp reality unalloyed by delusion and that's why they seem alien and terrifying.
Autism is our first glimpse at the posthuman future.
>>9735837
Why does this seem prescient?
You guys talk like fucking queers holy shit get a grip.
J.D. Salinger ruined my reputation.
>Be me, twenty something lawfag.
>Get new law firm job.
>Talking books with a partner, when she asks for a recommendation.
>Well well, I finished J.D. Salinger's nine stories on the train this morning. You can borrow my copy.
>"Wow, anon. Thanks!"
>Go home and realized I heavily annotated 'A Perfect Day for Bananfish.'
>Each time Seymour confronts lost youth, lost innocence, I wrote "YES."
>Each time Seymour confronts lost youth, lost innocence, it is vaguely Paedophilic, esp. when he kisses the little girl's foot. When that happened, I wrote "YES!!!" and starred the page.
>Partner returns the book a few weeks later. She stares at me squinting.
>"Some interesting notes in their Anon. Want to talk about it?"
>I'm blood red, she thinks I'm a pedo.
>"N-n-no, it's not wh-wh-what it looks like."
>She raised an eyebrow in disdain and walked away.
>mfw when she hardly speaks to me at all anymore
>mfw J.D. Salinger ruined my reputation.
>>9735813
>Each time Seymour confronts lost youth, lost innocence, I wrote "YES."
>>9735813
why are lawfags so universally lulzy
it's like the worst shit always happens to them and it's always funny as fuck
>anotating books
>>9735832
we work in the worlds worst industry
Why did James Joyce choose to write Ulysses and his other novels in English?
>>9735800
I know I wish he wrote them in another language so I didn't have to read them. joyce is terrible
>>9735814
This is just a silly thread
Books about extreme opulence and decadence in 1500's-1700's nobility
Is pic related what I'm looking for?
Just read picture of dorian gray and call it a day
>>9735756
Mitford's good, and Huxley has two around that period too (Grey Eminence and Devils of Loudon)
If you want something slightly earlier and first hand Book of Holy Doctors (Livre de seyntz medicines) by Henry Grosmont, Something bang in the middle and baroque, 2nd Earl of Rochester, though that's less detailed and more designed to shock. For something more judgy and with (slightly) less dicks, you could hit up Candide which takes more off the church aristocracy like Huxley.
I guess you could read Fielding too but that has a lot of poverty alongside whores.
>>9735756
Against Nature by Huysmans.
do you agree with Russel Means here
do you agree with Russel Means
""The process began much earlier. Newton, for example, "revolutionized" physics and the so-called natural sciences by reducing the physical universe to a linear mathematical equation. Descartes did the same thing with culture. John Locke did it with politics, and Adam Smith did it with economics. Each one of these "thinkers" took a piece of the sacredity of human existence and converted it into code, an abstraction. They picked up where Christianity ended: they "secularized" Christian religion, as the "scholars" like to say--and in doing so they made Europe more able and ready to act as an expansionist culture. Each of these intellectual revolutions served to abstract the European mentality even further, to remove the wonderful complexity and sacredity from the universe and replace it with a logical sequence: one, two, three. Answer! "
http://www.blackhawkproductions.com/russelmeans.html here's the full text
>>9735725
Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Frankfurt School, Weber, etc. made this point long ago.
And yes, I agree.
>>9735734
lol and they are incredibly wrong as well
what the hell does "desacredize" even mean, how could you even quantify something like that
and Newton did more than just write a linear equation, if you actually read the principia which you didn't
usually people that make these claims often have a poor understanding of science and the scientific method, as those people you mentioned
That's what I thought until I started probing more and more into science, after you've familiarized yourself through popsci with it and start digging into papers and heavier books, you'll find out that reality is much more sacred and miraculous as any mythology or religion has come up with
>heh, welcome to the water, kid
>Heh
It's a shakespeare reference
What do you guys think about Dan Harmons circle for writing story plot?
Does it only work for something in episodic form?
>>9735687
>Dan Harmon
>>9735694
Yeah I know he's a cuck and yada yada, but does the wheel make sense or is there a better story structure format for writing episodic content?
>>9735687
This works for Godzilla
>witches
>haunted castle
>filial secrets that threaten to tear the world apart
>slow and suspenseful
Shakespeare invented the Gothic Horror story.
and that would be the lowest of his achievements so really who gives a heck
>slow and suspenseful
It's Shakes' shortest play by a pretty wide margin. Shorter than the shortest comedy. Pacing beyond what flows naturally from the text is a directorial choice. I recall the recent adaptation taking extreme liberty with montage, while simultaneously removing significant portions of the text.
>haunted castle
More like haunted psyches.
yeah macbeth is sick.
I picked up A Frolic of His Own and The Recognitions this weekend.
Which one should I read, and why?
Shameless self bump
>>9735636
recognitions obviously
>>9736150
Why obviously ?
I'm a newbie
Start with the Greeks, end with the Scholastics.
Read a comprehensive book on the history of philosophy, then start with the greeks.
Not OP, how do I get started into stoicism?