I'm summoning all my heavy game continental philosophy /lit/erates. You know who you are: The one who write thorough, well-thought comments in the threads about Lacan, Baudrillard, Jung, Hegel, Heidegger, Freud, The Frankfurter School, Foucault and so on. I need your brain power and create a POWERFUL and BONAFIDA continental philosophy thread. Evolutionary psychology? Never heard of. Scientism? Bullshit. General american academia? Inferior.
This thread is ofcourse posted on this board, which means the attention of analytical weaboos, TED-americans youtubephilosophees and youngsters with heavy ideological and mistaken views upon core terms of philosophy (postmodernism as an example). In this thread we reclaim the respect of this board by merely showing our intellectual and moral superiorty. A true relevation of what it means to be an introspective scholar.
I'll start this thread by a request: Let's collect the greatest intellectual and academic works of the 20th century. Please bid in and give a short explanation of what you see as a major work and give a short explanation why.
I'll start with a fairly obvious one: Zizeks primary work. The Sublime Object of Ideology is his first big boat in international water. The hegelian school and its offsprings: Marx, the frankfurter school, Benjamin, Kripke etc. is thought together with the psychoanalytic school in a succesful attempt to revitalize the critique of ideology today with heavy, dialectic materialistic philosophical grounding.
What are your nominations, my continental /lit/erate brothers?
>>9791459
I laughed loudly at this book, I think Zizek is a real comedian
i would love to contribute to this thread but unfortunately if i don't get some IRL shit done this aft i am going to be some ultradeep shit
evopsych tho
evospych cool af
wilber kind of a meme but a well-intentioned one, also hegel, jung & all dem cool guys
>>9791459
zizek has very brilliant insights but his way to develop thoughts is retarded and goes nowhere
also him being a leftist is basically just a meme, could have been as well a rightwinger
Why is Macbeth considered as good as Hamlet?
Why is Romeo & Juliet considered worse than both?
Coriolanus and Lear are his greatest. Get on my lvl.
Romance was quite common back then.
A play based on a power-hungy tyrant was something extraordinarily new
>>9791411
Lear is overrated. Macbeth and Hamlet are superior plays. However, his greatest play is Othello. If the Ancient Greeks assembled the skeleton of drama, Shakespeare added the organs and the muscles. And if Shakespeare added the organs and the muscles, Eugene O'Neill added the skin and the texture.
What are the best books about (real) serial killers?
>>9791362
>adam lanza
>(real) serial killers
pick one
>>9791420
I don't want a book about Lanza.
>>9791435
I usually just read the their manifesto or letters they've written. Wikipedia articles can sometimes be false (e.g. Martin Bryant) t.v. / movies more so. If they have a biography written that would work depending on how accurate it is. who are you interested in learning about? anyone in particular?
So I've been reading a bunch of Plato lately and I figure it makes sense to read Aristotle next. Where's a good place to start with him?
>>9791189
Nicomachean Ethics with Joe Sachs.
>>9791195
red-pill me on Nicomachaean ethics please
Read Poetics, Nicomachean Ethics and Politics, then move on. You won't understand anything else.
Do you listen to music when you read?
Perhaps specific genres of music for certain books?
>>9791160
I always do so I can be a patrician in two fields at once.
No, any sort of noise besides something like a fan bothers me to the point where I can't concentrate on my reading at all.
shiggy
>Anyone who acts without paying attention to what he is doing is wasting his life. I'd go so far as to say that life is denied by lack of attention, whether it be to cleaning windows or trying to write a masterpiece.
t. nadia boulanger
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_literature
>>9791062
I looked at a rock once very closely. I was reading a 5 billion year old love note to me.... from God
>>9791062
In the original, fragments from Ennius. In translation, the Iliad
The poetry of the blood coarsing through my veins.
The most obscure and personal lyrics buried and found in the earth which i sow.
A novel written every minute of my life, but will all be lost as dust in the wind.
My diary desu.
Can musicals be /lit/?
Sometimes
>>9791059
Les Miserables is pretty /lit/.
Maybe, I think most are just autism distractions though.
in less than a year this guy managed to kill the nu-atheist movement that took people like hitchens, dawkins, and harris a decade to build
is this an admirable feat?
>>9791022
Every year the atheism grows.
>>9791022
Absolutely. The solution isn't a reversion to the slave faith of the Jew demiurge, but he is doing a great service in pointing these scientistic simpletons in desperate need of a leader toward Jung. They may awaken from their slumbers yet, and the Aryan race reborn.
I doubt it, if anything the nu-atheist crowd morphed and diversified. They are still present, and I'm imagining that certain online subcultures have former or morphed new atheists amongst their ranks. I'm imagining that the alt-light has a fraction of them.
The internet is truly interesting in that it allows information to spread so much faster as well as allowing much more information. I'm personally baffled by the explosion of the 'alt-right', and remember how we would discuss it here and nobody said it was a thing, until it blowed up in meatspace and the kekistani incident happened.
Perhaps you are seeing it wrong and it is a younger generation that takes Peterson as their lords and savior.
What are the prerequisites to reading Deleuze? I've picked up Difference and Repetition and his stuff with Guattari a bunch of times but put it down because it was incomprehensible. I know there are people far better read than I am (Chomsky) who dismiss it as total horseshit, but I really want to understand his stuff if at all possible.
read the todd may book
>>9790760
Open the wikipedia page. Look up 'influences'.
Basically just read continental philosophy until your brain turns into pure energy and then everything makes sense
I wish I were joking. This is how you read all continental philosophy. Just keep doing it and eventually it's like you become a space alien made of ghostly elastic twizzlers that reach out and grab other continental philosophers and absorb them into your brain. I don't remember how my brain worked before I could read Deleuze or Derrida or Baudrillard with reasonable confidence. It might have been made of wood or something.
What am I in for?
also buy thread, post shit you've bought recently and get laughed at for your taste
>>9790744
Current stack of books I'm on.
Lolita>Origins of Totalitarianism>Kafka>Been down so long> Dorian Gray
>>9790744
A time capsule for when this place changes or shuts down. Some funny stuff framed by shitposting.
>>9790768
Don't know how I've never heard of "Been Down So Long". Just bought the original edition off Amazon.
How do I write a cyberpunk novel?
by not being born after 1970
have your characters wear a lot of velcro
This genre is dead, think of something a-new
This seems to be the best board for this kind of question. I've been writing for ages now, released an ebook on Amazon, and have done a crapload of commissions for folks online. I have a full novel planned out and 110K words worth written out
I'd originally planned it as 3 books, and I'm a little over 1/3rd through the full story as I have it planned after about a year. Should I approach an agent with the first "book's" worth and keep working on the rest, or complete the full story and deliver it all at once and probably release it as either a 3-parter or one big book anthology?
doesn't matter, you're not going to get it published either way.
>>9790633
duly noted
>>9790612
One book at a time. Agents are often turned off by high page counts in general, let alone for an initial work.
bp
any book on the vietnam war
>>9790589
uma delicia
>>9790589
fucking hell
should I read this book?
what am I in for if I do?
You should read of if you think it's a horrific racist screed or epic redpill manifesto, otherwise don't bother
>>9790478
these posts are so /lit/ lol. honestly though you need to read peter singer. wouldnt you save a drowning child? well, there are other people out there dying too... if you dont want to be irrational, the only reasonable thing to do is to help them
>what am I in for if I do?
the truth.
but yes you should read it, it's a good study of the importance of intelligence in society. contrary to popular belief it's not all about race.
>leave carnivores to me
>dude if you wouldn't ignore a kid drowning next to you you should give all your money to niggers lmao
>>9790423
>dude not being a racist lmao
I wonder if he actually believes that we should kill all carnivores, or does that to sound interesting.
Nature is suffering, but it is clueless to think that removing carnivores from it vanquishes that very thing.
Not to mention it is impractical. But I have to say at least his idea is refreshing.