I'm not from a english speaking country but as i read this book, i suppose its pretty well-known. I read this as a child so it won't be hard or difficult to understand. This is all I recall about this book. This contains three independent stories but all of them with a single theme. They are told by a man who wanders villages and tell people stories for a living. I remember it kinda creepy overall. anybody got a clue on the title of the book?
It sounds interesting and the kitty is way too cute.
We'll get one last book before he dies right??
Are there any rumors on its subject matter?
What would you like to see his final novel be about?
;-)
>>10001565
His last novel should be about the collapse of American hegemony
>>10001565
The guy's probably sitting on several books and just being selective about releasing them. I expect another 8 x 4 titled L.A.-set pop detective story and then probably something massive like AtD
What is the coral plant supposed to be that is meant to help Gil in his quest for immortality during his no sleep mission?
An allegory
How does one get into oratory?
>>10001268
Demosthenes, Isocrates, Cicero, Quintillian on rhetoric perhaps?
What are the best translations of Aristotle? I have the complete works of Plato in German so I thought about getting a German edition of the main works, but I cant seem to find something that suits me.
When it comes to English editions I only know about Loebs but they are expensive? Anyone knows a good edition of the most important works of big A.
>pic related, wtf Germany...
>>10001263
Is this a good option?
What does /lit/ think of these guys?
They certainly pushed the envelope with what could be done through audio,and storytelling through it. Here is a link to this particular album where a Hacker infiltrates a theme park,forseeing much of this time period from 1971!
https://youtu.be/lmWFrMq3qNY
Is there any good alternate world war 2 books?
What are the best translations of the Illiad and the Odyssey?
>>10000961
certainly not the english ones kek
>>10000961
>translations
heh..
The Big Three
>Lattimore – pure precision set in stone
>Fitzgerald – extracts and conveys the meaning of the Greek language to a smooth English
>Fagles – sacrifices precision for a simplistic style
I prefer Fitzgerald, personally.
>Be warrior
>Read 5 Rings to become better warrior
>Every paragraph ends with: You must research this
wtf type of garbage book is this shit
one book will not teach you everything, you must research this
>>10001031
This. Start researching you lazy fuck. You wonder where to start? Well....you must research this
When im reading a book which is full of references, I must read all of them to fully understand it? For example The Outsider by Colin Wilson, it has lots of external references, which are not always fully explained, should I read em first?
>inb4 brainlet
Yes. And you have to read the books those books reference before that, and the books those books reference before that. Not just explicit references either, you have to read the writings that inspired the authors, as well as experiencing their experiences which did the same.
Colin Wilson is actually an incredible resource for this sort of thing. The Outsider is a fantastic book. He wrote a couple other in the same "cycle":
https://www.amazon.com/Colin-Wilsons-Outsider-Cycle-students-ebook/dp/B007UQ478I
...for which he was panned, badly, by the British intelligentsia, after briefly being a cause celebre due to The Outsider. Also worth reading are his The Occult and Beyond the Occult, if you're into that sort of thing.
But most likely you'll only want to read The Outsider, unless you specifically enjoy Wilson's thought or esoterica in general.
On what you're asking: It's a bit of both. You're basically going to go through several years where you're drowning in names without "anchors" that make them meaningful, until one day, you'll notice that this tendency has reversed dramatically, and you recognise more than you don't recognise. In order for that to happen, you just have to tolerate a bit of tedious slog for those first few years, using the Internet to look up various figures or at least making mental notes of them. I promise you, they eventually link up and form webs of relevance that are smaller and less intimidating than they seem at first.
But you definitely don't have to READ all those figures. Wilson is a great example of a trend among intellectuals, of having the "gist" of another thinker and responding to that. The knowledge of Coleridge necessary to understand a Wilsonian reference to Coleridge is probably about three or four talking-points that you will eventually have in your mind by reading things like Wilson for long enough, even if you never read Coleridge. Wilson's understanding of French philosophy, and many things actually, is not deep - he was an intellectual adventurer with his own vision and he travelled through many different scientific, philosophical, literary, esoteric circles picking up ideas which he liked. That's why he has been a gateway and a touchstone to so many of those things, for so many people. But he certainly didn't have a systematic appreciation of them.
Short answer: Nope.
ITT things /lit/ tricked you into buying/reading
>>10000852
turboplen go.
The wo books I have by Derrida.
Simone Weil is great.
>first book is great
>second book is great
>third book is great
>last book goes completely off the rails and fucks everything up
For the longest time I only had the first three and wished I could read the last one. Now that I have, I wish I never did
>Genre fiction
>>10000857
???
>>10001153
>>>/sffg/
What am I in for?
Sum gay ass anal sex
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnnHprUGKF0
a spiritually liberating blowjob by a ruggedly handsome cowboy
Return of George Smiley.
Blasts Brexit.
Thoughts?
Is this the best podcast about productivity, workflows and daily routines?
go shill your shitty podcast somewhere else
Sage