I really love Philip K Dick's novels, but I just finished pic related and... I don't understand why it exists. I'm not sure if there's some deeper metaphorical meaning I'm missing or if I somehow lost the plot, but it felt like it just kind of slowly fizzled out the entire way through.
Is it a novel that you need to read a few times to get? I need to understand.
>>9908491
I didn't particularly like or "get" it either - it's mildly interesting that the people in the alternate history like reading about our version of history, but that's about it. No idea what he meant by all the I Ching stuff.
>>9908491
Don't think it's anything beyond an alternate-history novel.
I found it very underwhelming, and it actually put me off from reading any of his other works. Then i read Ubik and i was blown away
It was his first novel though, don't be tough on the guy
kill your self bookfag
Do you listen to music while you read? If so, what?
>>9908434
I always found this album to have to much going on for reading. It always captures my attention, does it not for you?
For me, pic related
>>9908442
The album you posted is a solid pick as well. Music for 18 Musicians is pretty active, but I have some issues with attentiveness due to racing thoughts, and its liveliness actually helps me stay focused. Its repetition helps prevent it from distracting me.
>>9908452
That's really interesting, what are your other favorites?
looking for something interesting to read
>>9908389
honestly? just read catch-22 and pretend it's vietnam.
>read 'nam book
>it aint me starts playing
>>9908422
love that song
Was he right?
go back there retard
go back there retard
go back there retard
I wish to wallow in despair
What are some books about characters who completely ruin their lives? They have to do it to themselves, it can't be something that happens to them by a external force. The closest I can think of is Crime & Punishment but arguably Raskolnikov was better off with Siberia than not since hardship is not the same thing as ruination.
pic unrelated
If you are interested in Dostoevsky, read Notes From The Underground. There's also Journey to the End of the Night, but I didn't think it was very well written.
>>9908261
Without any irony, my diary desu.
>>9908261
A little sour there, Alex?
Hello /lit./ I came here for reasonable, well measured and rational discourse on a question I, and my peers have been debating recently but have been able to come to an agreement on. Is literary skill related to IQ? Given the recent rise in emphasis on IQ by memerson and others, one would think it does. However, the point could also be made that the ability to write good prose, develop interesting and complex story lines and reach conclusions could be due to "wisdom" and creativity, two traits not explicitly related to IQ. Obviously a <90 IQ person would have difficulty comprehending literature, let alone writing it. The debate here is around your average intelligence layman being able to write literature comparable to someone of an higher intellect if the aforementioned layman has superior traits related to the creation of literature. Sorry if this has dragged on, it's fucking late and I'm high as fuck.
Just from reading the first sentence I can already tell you believe IQ has a direct impact on one's ability to write literature.
>>9908147
sage goes in all fields
>>9908147
IQ measures one thing only: ease of pattern recognition. This translates into ease of learning.
So sure, if you have a high IQ and properly learn your grammar and rules of prose, you'll most likely have better literature (if we measure the literature's merit by said grammar and rules of prose) than others with a lower IQ, faster.
That can be said about anything though.
Where does the philosophical concept of an 'authentic' thing come from? Specifically I'm interested in how someone can intellectually justify the view that a counterfeit good is different to a 'real' good. If I make a 'counterfeit' Louis Vuitton bag that is 100% identical with the 'real' product then, I believe, it's a Louis Vuitton bag.
Plato is probably not the beginning of it but he's one of the earliest, certainly in the philosophical tradition, to suggest the concept of a true vs. false world.
>>9908128
milkies pls
>>9908128
>If I make a 'counterfeit' Louis Vuitton bag that is 100% identical with the 'real' product then, I believe, it's a Louis Vuitton bag.
Then you're stupid.
Also counterfeit goods are never as good as the real thing, if you could make bags of that quality you'd be famous as well.
Any other books like this? I just finished it and I feel like the way I look at the world is different. I want to keep this going but I feel like if I jump into something like a physics textbook or something it'll be too hard and I'll quit.
>>9907963
>reads one book of pop science
>"I feel like the way I look at the world is different"
Go far away and never come back
>>9907968
Yes I know it's a cliche reaction to reading it. That's why I want to read more. I don't want to stop here.
Pick up something by Mary Roach
What's the best English dictionary, thesaurus, and rhyming dictionary?
>>9907907
Also what's the best app for each?
>>9907907
The Oxford English Dictionary is the only English dictionary (also the best thesaurus). Rhyming dictionaries are for brainlet faggots.
anyone who recommends something other than samuel johnson's original lexicon started with the romans.
Why do feminists hate Updike so much?
His name suggests that things should be put up dykes.
>>9907838
What's Updike?
Why do redditors make so many threads about feminists?
>The book has a foreword, a preface, and an introduction
>>9907826
>mfw blessed
>book has front cover ripped off, as well as the pages before page 1
>The book has a foreword, a preface, an introduction, a translator's note, an editor's note, an author's note, a glossary, an appendix, a bibliography, and an index
"I pictured diagrams of the cardiovascular system we would memorize in class as blood drained from the heart in his open chest."
Use more terminology that you would find in those diagrams to drive home the point. You can do better than blood, heart, and open chest.
>>9907710
I tried but I just think its a stupid thing to say.
Maybe something like:
Clinical though it was, the dramatic scene of blood draining from his open chest only provoked meditations on the underlying mechanism at this moment. Images I had seen in class of the cardiovascular system with all its inner complexities came to mind and no passion was felt.
>>9907710
The scene was reminiscent diagrams of the heart I saw in anatomy class, words like coronary, aorta filled my head as I watched the blood drain
What did Mishima mean by this?
>>9907597
something loyalty something something hired gun, something something あなたはあなたのために大きな男です!
>implying 5'7" wasn't the 6'2" of Mishima's era
manletsbtfo
Hey, /lit/. What books do I need to read to become an intellectual?
>>9907590
For me it was Kevin MacDonald's Culture of Critique Series
Start with the Greeks
>>9907590
Start with geometry.
so this girl i work with told me she was looking for self help books because she needed motivation to achieve something and make something of herself so i told her they were shit and to read stirner and Nietzsche instead. today she told me she started the ego and its own. did I did a good thing?
>>9907547
There this girl at my work who sort of looks like that but she always looks so downcast and sad now, its actually pretty heartbreaking because she is actually fairly attractive
pshh what am I saying, I live for this shit
>>9907547
>the ego and its own
>using the Tucker translation
The correct title is The Unique and Its Property
>>9907547
its pretty kek that /lit/ fell for the stirner meme desu