Is he the greatest storyteller of our generation? How can book writers even compete?
>implying anyone on /lit/ would even pass the asylum demon
Is it possible to change human nature (greed, self identity, Machiavellianism) through education in philosophy? Or are we as a people doomed to live with personal indulgence until we cease to exist?
>>9942100
>self identity
Explain further.
If you want my honest opinion, people simply tend towards the easier route when given options. It's difficult to fight the instinct to consume for oneself.
Human Nature is a social construct. An artifact of the Capital/Market ideology.
>>9942100
>human nature
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Any good online communities to read and write for other people, discuss books and etc?
Wattpad seems so plebian and retarded, but I can't find any other site
they don't exist
best thing to do is find a few people, preferably mentors, that you love talking to about anything under the sun
>>9942107
Nah faggot, I'm the senpai here I don't need any new teacher
I want some place to build a following, I can post stupid shit and artwork on my social media, but I have no place to post the bullshit I write and nobody around me has interest in literature
>>9942081
Seconding this, no idea how am I supposed to build an audience and people on whattpad are fanfic-tier retards
>make a list of ten to twelve extremely important books I should read so I can finally stop feeling held hostage by the pseuds
>look at the list and realise how fucking boring it will be
>realise I should just stop caring what the pseuds think
>delete the list and feel a profound sense of relief
>repeat the process later on
Go read Grillet. Grillet is fun, Grillet is love.
>>9942075
Read 12 right wing books and learn the truth about women, jews, and blacks and superiority of capitalism
>thinking it's important to read meme nonfiction like Origin of Species and Wealth of Nations
To get a basic understanding of the subjects, it's better to just read modern textbooks. They cover all the important discoveries of these famous texts minus the bits that have been debunked plus stuff that wasn't known 200 years ago. The only book like this that's actually worth reading is Euclid because it's fun to work through the proofs yourself with a compass and straight edge.
>book title has "American" in it
>>9942067
>Psycho
>Pastoral
>Tragedy
These were decent.
>>9942072
its so dull, same goes for works in other mediums
What is /lit/'s opinion of Joseph Brodsky?
>>9941966
>Joseph Brodsky
i dont know him but he looks grumpy, so i like him.
Pic related.
WLC.
Dawkins and Hitchens always appeared as being atheist out of spite for something.
Harris is just arrogant, I've never seen him admit to being wrong.
Dennett is cool.
Bald Hitchens was also swell.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XAAN1aGwME
>>9941926
Maybe by forming your own opinions rather than expecting others to do so for you?
People pay them to have ideas for everyone else. They're literally idea guys. You can ignore them, if you want, but that requires you come up with your own ideas, which is hard.
How do you make a story fit into a specific word count? Is it just a matter of cutting as many extraneous bits of description as possible, like changing
>Craig grinned. It had been too long since they'd spoken. "I don't think so", he replied.
to simply
>"I don't think so."
?
>>9941843
There is something very unsettling about that picture
Full of its misleading and provocative titles they don't try to philosophize but would rather just make a assumption without being educated or at least researching for a bit the subject so they end up making a lot of rookie mistakes and since their readers don't care about researching either they end up being given wrong information which makes decades of people having absolutely wrong ideas about the said object and in turn complete distorting of truth and thought. Just looking at their attack on reality that is common sense way before the greeks shows their inaptness
>>9941722
Post-modernism is just fanaticism and submission to sublimity. It is no more rebellious or edgy than any fundamentalist belief.
>>9941722
Postmodernism is the last drop of sperm dripping from your dad's dick after you gave him a good swallow-wahooo. Those tiny little swimmers whose destination is predetermined are released into the abyss thinking they will finally fulfill their purpose in life only to be lead astray into the belly of the beast. Raise your flagellae t0 the sky little warriors, YOU SHALL BE MISSED.
>>9941799
Sorry for having your dad molest you
/lit/ i´m intrigued by philosophy and need a place to start. Also, is there a correct or better order to read the major works of philosophy ?
>>9941706
Start with the presocratics, or just jump into Plato. If you start with Plato, start with Euthyphro, then, Apology, then Crito, then Meno then Phaedo, then Republic, then Symposium, then Phaedrus. If you want you can keep reading Plato or you can jump into Aristotle (Who's a bit dry, but still excellent).
>>9941706
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/mobilebasic?pli=1
Start where ever you want and with whatever interests you. No biologist starts biology reading Aristotle and fitness doesn't have to begin with jogging before you can do running. Interest first. Linearity is bullshit. If you find something that inspires you to go to the presocratics, you'll do it.
Definitely don't listen to anyone here, myself included. We're illiterate. If we weren't, we'd be reading philosophy instead of being on the internet.
What are some books on shamanism or primal occultism?
Start with the Neanderthals
In Darkness and Secrecy: The Anthropology of Assault Sorcery and Witchcraft in Amazonia
Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy by Mircea Eliade
ITT: /lit/ equivalent for Wes Anderson's movies
I'd say Brian Selznick or Meg Wolitzer
Try "shadow of the wind" by zafon.
Or browse through the teen section in your local library and find the most pretentious-looking book cover.
What did /lit/ think of it?
Will probably read first book one day.
That's what I think of it.
>>9941627
It's called The Broken Empire Trilogy, you mong. And it's Thorns, not Thornes, anyway.
I found it very difficult to get into at first because I disliked the angsty god-modding teenage boy trope, and found his love for and descriptions of violence cringey.
Once I shut that part of my brain off, it was a moderately enjoyable romp. Nothing groundbreaking, but passable nonetheless.
I will completely forget everything about it within the next 5 years, I'm already hazy on most of it and I only read it about a year or two ago.
get back into your containment general stupid newfuck
>In interviews, Smith has cited Colin Wilson,[9] Arthur Machen, Wyndham Lewis, Thomas Hardy,[10] Philip K. Dick as influences,[11] as well as Edgar Allan Poe, Raymond Chandler,[12] and H. P. Lovecraft, whose short story "The Colour Out of Space" he read in Christmas 2007 for the BBC Collective website.[13]
does mark e smith have /lit/ taste in lit?
HEY THERE FUCKFACE
I don't know who he is but he has /new age and weird fiction/ taste in /lit/ which is pretty cool
Colin Wilson alone gets him a pass
>>9941651
Singer from British post-punk band The Fall
I enjoyed Don Quixote and A Confederacy of Dunces. I'd like to read something that fits the picaresque type most closely.
There's always candide
Journey to the end of the night is kind of like a twisted picaresque
The OG
Check out Cervantes' Rinconete y Cortadillo too.
Alexander Boldizar's The Ugly is pretty good