>"Haha Joyce!!" "Pynchon the jokester!"!" "Corncob Tortilla Ye'Carthy!!" "Moby balls lol"
Why don't you pseuds shut the fuck up about all your bullshit and accept daddy Marcel as the best writer?
literally who?
>>9116601
Get the fuck off this board.
Proust posting lately makes me want to vomit.
Why his this man not received a Nobel?
Because he is a chink/gook/slopehead
He's not a good writer. His slop falls out indiscriminately onto the page. I'd be surprised if he ever edited a day in his life.
The only asian author I know is Murakami. I haven't read one novel of his. I'm 80% sure that's who is in the image.
If you're not hurtling your hardened ego forward in a violent explosion to obliterate any and all enemies in order to overcome the incohesion of your inner feminine void, then you can't rightfully call yourself a fascist.
>Klaus Theweleit, in his study of the psychic structure of fascist soldier males in Germany, has identified a similar impulse to negate sensual pleasure by recourse to violent acts or fantasies. For these men, as for Marinetti, the war figured as the ideal arena in which to experience the relation of body and world. Only in war could they be the source of, or somehow connected to, every explosion, without risking the disintegration of their fragile egos. Apart from war, the soldier males Theweleit analyzed organize their lives on the model of severe military discipline and maintain relationships primarily with other men within a strict hierarchical order. By disciplining the body, rendering it hard and nearly metallic, they create a kind of protective armor designed to shield them from their fear of dissolution. This fear emanates from the sense of an inner void, or lack of psychic coherence, which is then projected outward. Often it takes the threatening form of a miasma associated with both femininity and the unruly proletarian masses.
>The texts Theweleit analyzes frequently describe this miasma as bloody, oozing, a viscous liquid with the power to contaminate, overwhelm, or destroy whatever it comes into contact with. The creation of body armor is designed to render the fascist soldier male resistent to this contagion, but also, and perhaps most importantly, serves to render him impervious to sensual or erotic pleasure. For sexual communion with another implies the breaching of both psychic and corporeal boundaries.
>For the Fascist soldier male, desire may be released only in the moment of destruction or annihilation of the other—the moment of firing a machine gun, throwing a grenade, or dropping a bomb. This outward eruption provides a surfeit of sensations in which the rifleman, for example, imagines himself as a bullet, hurtling through space to penetrate the enemy. He desires, not union with the enemy, but its utter obliteration. As Theweleit explains, he explodes against the enemy, in a movement that allows his body to atomize as it erupts outwards.Yet this seeming disintegration ultimately serves to strengthen his body-ego—like a gun that explodes in a powerful discharge of energy but remains whole. A similar attitude drives many of Marinetti’s corporeal fantasies, revealing a profound desire to experience the body as a ballistic weapon, to render it both an explosive force and impervious to attack. “Let’s Murder the Moonshine” of 1909 proclaims: “It is necessary—do you understand?—necessary for the soul to launch the body in flames, like a fireship, against the enemy, the eternal enemy that we would have to invent if it didn’t exist.” This text continues to describe the “furious” pleasure of war as a form of coitus to which even the feminized, “informe” (miasmic) enemy abandons herself: “See the furious coitus of war, gigantic vulva stirred by the friction of courage, informe vulva that rips itself open the better to offer itself to the terrifying spasm of the next victory! It’s ours, the victory. . .of that I’m sure, because the madmen are already hurling their hearts toward heaven, like bombs!”
good shit
I don't get it. Is it saying that the fascist is fucking the world?
I think life is really boring and pointless, pretty much an inconvenience. What philosophy should I read to confirm these thoughts?
Sam Harris
The rapist
Philosophy's purpose isn't to validate your ideas, cunt.
anons are welcome to post aswell
>>9116050
We don't like women
Make a thread on Schopenhauer's 'On Women' and you'll get hundreds of replies, instead of this cuckery
>>9116109
>he hasn't read her
We're very much okay with Simone "Come Fite Me IRL Trotsky" Weil. Stop being such a fucking dickhead because you can't understand Schopenhauer, the simplified Kant.
>>9116109
>insulting The Red Virgin
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I started reading Infinite Jest and lost all hope in becoming a good writer, when there are geniuses like him
Even if I practiced writing 12+ hours a day for years I won't be anywhere near as good as he was at the age of 24
Anyone else with these feels?
>>9115691
How about you shut your fucking mouth and go write something? If you keep bitching about how you'll never be a great writer, then just fuck off, already. You're creating a self-fulfilling prophecy. Wallace didn't start until he was 21. This alone disproves the whole meme of how "if you don't do it as a kid, you'll never be good."
I like making Amu (DFW) commit suicide, dude's suppose to be smart. He says the dumbest shit ever
>>9115691
Read the work he had published while at amherst, you'll be more confident afterward. On the other hand though, your father most likely isn't a Wittgenstein scholar and your mother most likely hasnt published a book on grammar, so I feel you. But also, DeLillo grew up with immigrants in the bronx and wrote a novel that made DFW feel "dumb and humbled". So it's all relative, work harder newfag
Is linguistics worth studying, or did Chom already make the field obsolete?
>>9115506
Worth studying for what?
Chomsky is obsolete. You can't create a universal theory of human language if you only speak English.
>>9115527
For progression of the field.
Why is Rand laughed out of intellectual circles? Individual rights aren't an absurd thing to wish for.
That's what happens when women try to talk about politics and philosophy
Majority is left.
Minority is right.
So certain cercles ridiculize others and their voice is predominant.
She isn't laughed at for the advocation of individual rights, she's laughed at because she created "objectivism" purely as a justification for Social Darwinism. It's a disingenuous attempt to subvert criticism.
I want lesbian books, please.
Sappho
my diary desu
Last Words From Montmartre- Miaojin
Girl meets boy- Smith
Why are humans so ashamed of sex?
Social pressure mostly
Disease, bastards, dominance, etc..
Because it's gross and dehumanizing.
What the fuck do I need to do to understand this shit?
How do I into poetry?
Why do you want to into poetry, bud?
>>9118890
I feel like I'm missing out.
What archetype would you consider Charles Foster Kane to incorporate?
Also, Jung thread
>>9118749
This quote is why I'm a tranny.
>>9118754
That's fabulous senpai
>>9118754
What would Jung say about transgenderism? An overactive anima / animus?
Kierkegaard was right about everything.
Either/Or should have been read by everyone before they've even learned to read.
It's that good.
The Diapsalmata gives the best diagnosis of human worth.
Silhouettes is the best description of how sadness varies.
Just to tell. The Aesthetic, Ethic, and Religious... wow!
Want to get into him, where do I start?
I'm not well versed with real philosophy either, should I become familiar with others first? I remember some chart that said Hegel was essential to getting Kierkegaard. If so where to start with him?
>>9118406
Sure, you'd need a knowledge of Hegelian terms, but just pick up a copy of Either/Or and start reading. You'll see how much of a father he really is.
>>9118399
I can't wait to really start reading Kierkegaard. Every time I see some excerpt from him or a summary of one of his ideas, I get more excited.
>be very mean to someone
>say something nice about him after 1-2 weeks of being a dick
>suddently becomes your new best friend
how well does this work? posting this here as everyone in this board is a psychology master
You've established your sexual superiority to him. If you had half a brain you would have raped the queeb, and been in total control of him at this point.
>>9117925
it works unexpectedly well when the other person is desperately lonely
>>9117925
the trump strategy?
cognitive dissonance works wonders
Is it just me, or does this man look increasingly like Brendan Fraser?
>>9117579
his books are utter garbage
>but m-muh sandman
sorry kid, this is a literature board for adults
>Neil Gaiman's family is of Polish-Jewish and other Eastern European-Jewish origins
now thats a shocker
>>9117579
He got the aids