"the vast majority of the world’s Buddhists do not meditate"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lewis-richmond/most-buddhists-dont-medit_b_1461821.html?utm_hp_ref=prayer
Do you know an academic source that confirms this?
>>9222458
can't find one but its true. western society has turned meditation into meme like its fucking caffeine. if you meditate your life will improve and you'll become 'enlightened"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXyLbU1GGqU
>>9222471
It improves how you deal with mental stress
>>9222458
Donald Lopez is a professor of Buddhist studies and I'm fairly sure he's made the same statement. Most Buddhists are Asian laypeople who see meditation as something for monks to do.
We in the Scientific community have gained a new insights that will allow our engineers to make some rather drastic changes to our genome, bodies and surroundings while maintaining human consciousness.
What is the opinion of /lit/ on the new findings?
Will the religious community crack under the new strains and findings?
Are we on the cusp of a new renaissance?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLb9EIiSyG8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nkQMbDpHeA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS590Xtq9M4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biwlfcljx9Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
Also;
Do any of you see a co-relation to these steel men and the old story of The Golem of Prague?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7xvqQeoA8c
>>9222396
CRIPSR and rejuvenation sounds quite promising, but automation is pretty overrated IMO, and if neural networks are anything to go by, AIs will be kind of like us - something that has very little idea of how it actually works instead of something precisely engineered.
>Will the religious community crack under the new strains and findings?
You overestimate the unity and power of the "religious community" and underestimate the amount of mental gymnastics that can be done by the religious, these findings won't change anything.
>>9222396
>I'll be happy as an immortal robot
Lmao
>>9222396
Go read The possibility of an Island, instead
Why's it so difficult to write about modern music? You might say 'Just don't', but I want to because I'm aiming to set the scene well, and in our time shit like rap and edm are prevalent so I'm going to mention them.
Problem is that describing doesn't go far beyond 'pulsating bass' and even that's extremely weak. Is there any way to improve?
>>9222374
Study classical music and the basics of electronic music making, and come uo with complex, sophisticated music that follows those forms. It may take a lifetime to get that right, if you're not twlented enough.
>>9222374
I have the same problem. I love listening to music but I don't know how to write about it. How to write about the sounds, for instance; all I know how to say is stuff like "synth" or "piano backdrop".
Oftentimes reviewers will say "this song has a bluegrass feel" or "this song has a particular new wave influence" but to me that just makes it more complicated, genres feel so fuzzy and non-descriptive.
It helps to learn fundamentals of composition. I find music in general hard to right about, though.
Some good CONTEMPORARY Asian philosophers?
We all know the Warring States ones by now. And the few Neoconfucian ones worthy of note. But what have they been up to recently?
Neofascist Japanese authors are the future
Byung Chul Han
Michel Henry
I'm planning on making a digital library for myself. How does /lit/ store their PDFs, ePubs and such?
I currently read from an iPad Air which is surprisingly comfy but keep files backed up on Dropbox. Would rather keep them offline On a USB-C or something.
What do you lot do?
Holy shit, do whatever you want, store them in folders, in USB devices, in dropbox, but don't waste a fucking thread for such an irrelevant question
>>9222282
keep a physical paper copy of every book, and get several flash drives.
Did he live vicariously through his philosophy?
>>9222163
he was a loser and an edgelord
He lived autistically though his parents' income.
>>9222367
That settles that, thanks anon
What do u think of this guy's books ?
typed him in google, looks gay
does he even have a youtube account?
POst his patreon so I can give him 20000 dollars a month
> you realize /lit/ is a surjection of /pol/
ah yes a surjection
*surreptitiously opens google*
You seem a little annoyed that somebody in another thread blasted you into another dimension with some basic facts that completely deconstruct your naive fantasy about how black and white morals are thanks to being "progressive". I suggest trying to read a little more, expand your awareness and appreciation.
ah yes surreptitiously
*yells at Alexa to define urreptitiously *
*Alexa reports me to CIA*
*Alexa plays Trap Queen by Fedy Wap*
Looking for some solid resources on the Mithraic mysteries, can anyone help me out?
read the bible instead, that stuff will lead you straight to hell
>>9222008
It's too late to turn back now, I've already drank of the life, pic is me
I have a copy of Nabarz the mysteries of Mithras which is decent. He's a bit of a loon since he actually believes in this stuff. If you get the chance head to Roma and see the Basilica di San Clemente...
Which countries have the best folk/pagan mythos?
START
Grimm Brothers Germany
Aesops Fables
Kalevala
Russian Fairy Tales -A'fansev
Havamal
Beowulf
Does /b/ know a few ethnology essays that are as interesting and as readable as pic related ? Lévi-Strauss is great but not comfy at all.
>/b/
I haven't read much anthropology at all but Clifford Geertz is very readable with his thicc description.
People still post on /b/?
>>9221997
What have you read from Lévi-Strauss ?
I thought that Tristes Tropiques was really comfy.
De près et de loin is comfy as well, not too technical, but I don't if an english translation exists.
Can someone, please, help me to figure out how to articulate the difference between virtue and situational ethics
If you are a good person, it's ok to make mistakes.
>>9221881
They are pretty similar.
Basically, virtue ethics focuses on what it means to be a good person. That is, what are the kind of character traits that a good person would have (as opposed to moral "laws" that can be followed in any situation).
Situational ethics agrees with this, but also seems to put forward the notion that love is a virtue that would apply to any situation.
Virtue and situational ethics are both relativist in that they agree that ethical behaviour would look different in different situations.
>>9221912
Thank you for your reply!
>have a thought I want to write down
>don't, because I can't find that right way of starting my sentence
how do i not do this
just write you are caught up in impossible perfction
Just draw a picture instead.
Abstain from editing until you're done with the writing portion of your effort for the day, otherwise you'll be stuck perfecting one paragraph forever.
>3,000 sonnets
>3 novels
>4 novellas
>9 epic poems
>500 plays
And you haven't even finished that novel, have you anon?
>>9221774
I'd be a genius if there wasn't internet
Still a nobody.
>>9221780
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>Numbers didn’t just describe reality; numbers were reality, discrete step functions smoothing up across the Planck length into an illusion of substance. [People] still quibbled over details, doubtless long since resolved by precocious children who never bothered to write home: Was the universe a hologram or a simulation? Was its boundary a program or merely an interface—and if the latter, what sat on the other side, watching it run? (A few latter-day religions had predictably answered that question with the names of their favorite deities, although Brüks had never been entirely clear on what an omniscient being would need a computer for. Computation, after all, implied a problem not yet solved, insights not yet achieved. There was really only one sort of program for which foreknowledge of the outcome didn’t diminish the point of the exercise, and Brüks had never been able to find any religious orders that described God as a porn addict.)
Number is antithetic to word as quantity is antithetic to quality.
>>9221745
Ah, good old Watts.Seriously can we do like a kickstarter for this dude or something? He wants to write and I think a lot of people want to read him, but he's expressed a few times that he's having trouble with funding and publication processes generally. Feel like the online lit community should be able to help him in some way.