Recommend me a book after which I will stop using the internet completely or at least all sorts of useless online activities likebrowsing chans.
I feel that it's network structure and linked topology has had a lasting negative effect on the structure of my brain after all these years. I know that I am/ have been addicted to it but now where I use it less and less I still feel that my thought process is corrupted. Seems like only a clean cut helps.
the shallows: what the internet is doing to our brains by nicholas carr
zorba the greek might help
>>10003234
Bumping for interest
This is my options, read a couple of them.
First, what is a man to you?
Made some changes...
>>10003156
Someone confident, that is in control of everything, basically a alpha.
Alphas don't read books.
>>10003175
Add The Secret to the list. Changed my life. Culture of Critique is excellent too.
Is this the best example of a film that could only have been made in the film medium?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRFZ4VpREg0
It's tied with a Man With a Movie Camara.
>>10003001
8 and a half.
What is some good conservative literature with a non-Marxist bias? No far-right extremist bullshit, just looking for smart ideas and insight in regular conservative form.
Edmund Burke, Russell Kirk, Hamilton, Samuel Johnson
>smart ideas
>conservative
Hmm no.
Sorry but I prefer bad conservative literature with a Marxist bias
>Get thee to a nunnery
/ouyguy/
There are more things in heaven and Earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your memes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmNYWTpYj8M
>laurence ollivre
>no toothe
IS IT SAFE?
Why is David Foster Wallace such a joke on /lit/? I was never a fan of IJ, but I do like a lot of his essays.
>>10002899
he's not. You're repeating what everyone who is being ironic about him says. Which is really sad.
>>10002899
Not really related to your question, but can someone please explain to me why exactly IJ is so highly acclaimed? I'm about 200 pages in and so far I'm not impressed. I constantly have to force myself not to just skip entire sections because he goes off on so many tangents and unnecessary details that don't add anything to the story. Am I missing something? Should I just keep reading?
>>10002931
A decently funny trap to set people up for considering DFW's thoughts on irony for its own sake
What is your honest opinion/personal interpretation of this play? It seems that everybody has different theories and ideas on its ambiguities and messages. I'd like to get a complete picture of this play that a cursory reading couldn't get me.
Oedipus was a sleepwalker; Hamlet was an insomniac.
>>10002884
Wtf why is Hamlet a woman? Fucking SJWs!
Legitimately one of the greatest cultural entities (play, story, or otherwise) in humanity's history.
Did anyone else want whale stake after that chapter?
And does Moby Dick have not if not THE best closing paragraph in a book? The final lines are absolutely beautiful.
I live in Japan so let's just say that my desire for whale steak inspired by Moby-Dick was soon satisfied by purchasing and eating some much to the delight of my tounge and belly.
>>10002880
How did it actually taste and we all agree Starbucks best boy, right?
>>10002828
"and in the end...his name really was moby dick."
Why the fuck didn't he call it a pen like everyone else? Was it autism?
He was an absurd hero
He refused to play a game he knew to be meaningless
>>10002803
Nigga, are you retarded?
He read too much philosophy of language for a kid his age. . . It fucked up his brain.
He was one of us
What are some things, when you read them, that you feel like a fucking retard?
>reading physical descriptions of the landscape
This always destroys my brain. I just cannot comprehend reading a bunch of sentences that describe a landscape. Reading Lord of the Rings was a killer for me. It all just gets so jumbled and cloudy in my brain and I can't understand any of it
Anything related to sailing.
Anything described as "shapeless
you have to take the time to construct the landscape in your head. not just read and see it as if there was a photograph embedded in the text. take it one piece at a time.
What is the best biography available for Lovecraft?
Is "I Am Providence" by Joshi any good?
>>10002766
Joshi is obsessed with HPL, so it's probably very thorough and detailed. It depends whether that's what you look for in a biography, or if you'd prefer more of an easily-digestible overview. I read L. Spague De Camp's one, which seemed pretty decent, but I've heard people say it's outdated. There's also a popular book about him by Houellebecq.
racist
>>10002766
>I am Providence
I haven't read it but I can tell from the title that he knows what's up
Bowden understood him well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7qQ7A4rWM8
Post some mysteroius books. Horror, surreal, religious or whatever you want. Preferably novels. Must be very mysterious. I'm tired of searching the same shit on goodreads.
>The Golem & The Green Face, Gustav Meyrink
>The Master and Margarita, Mikhail Bulgakov
How do you edit your work on its brute first form? Besides doing grammatical corrections how do your formulate your piece? Do you go for long or medium sentences or do you go for short paragraphs to appeal for the modern short attention spam? Do you usually add or remove more stuff? Do you even make a backup of the original version?
>>10002727
I usually don't back up the fist draft, but if I'm making a big revision that I'm unsure of I'll leave the original (this gets to be a problem when one version inevitably becomes more rewritten and edited than the other). I generally cannot help editing and rearranging as I write, so I almost never have a complete first draft that I then edit. Generally I try to complete a section before editing it, but I still change individual words or rewrite sentences as I go and as they occur to me.
My instinct is long paragraphs, but I now tend toward shorter ones, essentially one complete thought or subject, regardless of how many sentences it uses. I'm inclined to try to get out of this habit and look for a good middle ground between long and short paragraphs. I usually add far more than I remove, and almost never remove an entire idea (scene, plot point, w/e, I do remove whole lines sometimes if I think it's superfluous though), just put it somewhere else or rework it if I feel it needs to be changed.
>>10002920
Thanks anon
>>10002727
I revise in a chapter-by-chapter basis. Usually edit whatever I wrote two times after I write it, and then do a general revision of the thing.
I look for excessive use of certain words, read the text aloud, try to keep cohesion, check up on the metaphors and similes, etc.. Finally, I send it to my editor, he sends the thing back, and I try to decide whether I like it or not.
As for paragraph lenght, it really depends on the voice and personality of my characters, unless I'm working on imagery or atmosphere; in that case, I try to make it varied by reading aloud what I wrote and trying to see how well it flows.
Also, Tae best girl.
>"There's no such thing as good or bad writing. It's all subjective."
I'm an accomplished, award-winning novelist with several works in print.
I can tell you unequivocally that if you hold the above opinion about literature or any artform then you are a fool, and you need to just shut up forever.
How did this lie even start, let alone spread? It's just so patently false. Why is it so universal among uncreative morons?
https://youtu.be/RSDmo-gJ8XY
>>10002655
>I'm an accomplished, award-winning novelist with several works in print.
Sure you are
>>10002655
why did you attach that video?
>>10002655
So what am I supposed to now? Stop liking things I like because it isn't good enough as decided by by some unknown objective standard?
How many pages have you read today? What have you learned from today's reading?
Like 10 and nothing. Got static on the brain :(
>>10002527
Bout 50, also
>reading to learn
>>10002527
0
Today I learned that the average wine is cheap as fuck
god bless Kaufland